Correction to: Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard.

Unfortunately the article was published with a spell error in the co-author name "Hassan Maan". The correct co-author name should be "Hassaan Maan".

Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the findings on 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using PIRADS version 2 with prostate biopsy results as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 134 consecutive treatment naive patients (mean age 64 years, range 41-82 years) underwent MRI-directed prostate biopsy. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy was used for 77 (77/134 = 57.5%) patients, cognitive fusion for 51 (51/134 = 38.0%) patients, and 6 patients (6/134 = 4.5%) without a target nodule had systematic biopsy only. Out of the 1676 biopsy sites, 237 (237/1676 = 14.1%) were positive on MRI for a PIRADS 3, 4, or 5 nodule. Fifty-eight (58/134, 43.3%) patients had clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The findings on MRI using PIRADS version 2 were correlated with the biopsy results. RESULTS: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PIRADS ≥ 3 for csPCa were 89%, 76.5%, 89.7%, 31.7%, and 98.4%, respectively. The detection rates of csPCa for PIRADS 3, 4, and 5 nodules were 6.1% (4/66), 33.3% (42/126), and 64.4% (29/45), respectively. MRI did not identify a nodule in 23/1676 (1.4%) biopsy sites that contained csPCa. The MRI reader, biopsy operator, method of fusion biopsy, and zonal location of prostate nodule did not significantly affect the odds of having a biopsy result positive for csPCa. CONCLUSION: PIRADS ≥ 3 had high specificity and high negative predictive value for csPCa using biopsy results as the standard of reference. The presence of csPCa from a biopsy site was highly unlikely in the absence of a corresponding PIRADS ≥ 3 nodule.

Prospective comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI and contrast-enhanced CT with histopathological correlation for preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases following chemotherapy and potential impact on surgical plan.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) following chemotherapy and to evaluate the potential change in the hepatic resection plan. METHODS: 51 patients with CRLM treated with preoperative chemotherapy underwent liver imaging by EOB-MRI and CECT prospectively. Two independent blinded readers characterized hepatic lesions on each imaging modality using a 5-point scoring system. 41 patients underwent hepatic resection and histopathological evaluation. RESULTS: 151 CRLM were confirmed by histology. EOB-MRI, compared to CECT, had significantly higher sensitivity in detection of CRLM ≤1.0 cm (86% vs. 45.5%; p < 0.001), significantly lower indeterminate lesions diagnosis (7% vs. 33%; p < 0.001) and significantly higher interobserver concordance rate in characterizing the lesions ≤1.0 cm (72% vs. 51%; p = 0.041). The higher yield of EOB-MRI could have changed the surgical plan in 45% of patients. CONCLUSION: Following preoperative chemotherapy, EOB-MRI is superior to CECT in detection of small CRLM (≤1 cm) with significantly higher sensitivity and diagnostic confidence and interobserver concordance in lesion characterization. This improved diagnostic performance can alter the surgical plan in almost half of patients scheduled for liver resection.

Pictorial review of vascular involvement and complex vascular reconstructions in borderline to minimally advanced pancreatic malignancies.

PURPOSE: To review borderline resectability criteria for pancreatic malignancies, show examples of few surgically treated minimally advanced pancreatic malignancies, discuss various complex vascular reconstructions, and highlight the imaging appearances. BACKGROUND: Often aggressive surgical approaches are used to treat borderline to minimally advanced pancreatic malignancies in specialist centers. As abdominal radiologists it is essential to have up-to-date knowledge to distinguish such tumors with accuracy and also be well versed with the various vascular reconstructions used in such surgeries. IMAGING FINDINGS: We will show various examples of resected borderline resectable and minimally advanced pancreatic malignancies, highlight crucial vascular involvements, describe various types of advanced vascular reconstructions, and review their standard imaging appearances. We will also briefly describe the vascular complications and highlight the importance of imaging surveillance in early post-operative period. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential for abdominal radiologists in specialist centers where aggressive surgical approaches are used to have accurate knowledge to assess vascular involvement in pancreatic malignancies and equally to recognize and assess vascular reconstructions on imaging after complex surgeries.

Liver Transplantation is a Preferable Alternative to Palliative Therapy for Selected Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the traditional criteria (advanced HCC) are typically offered palliation, which is associated with a 3-year survival rate lower than 30%. This study aimed to describe the outcomes for a subset of patients with advanced HCC who satisfied the Extended Toronto Criteria (ETC) and were listed for liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: All patients listed in the Toronto liver transplantation program with HCC beyond both the Milan and University of California, San Francisco criteria were included in this study. Data were extracted from the prospectively collected electronic database. All radiologic images were reviewed by two independent radiologists. The primary end point was patient survival. RESULTS: Between January 1999 and August 2014, 96 patients with advanced HCC were listed for LT, and 62 (65%) of these patients received bridging therapy while on the waiting list. Bridging therapy led to a significant reduction in tumor progression (p = 0.02) and tumor burden (p < 0.001). The majority of those listed underwent LT (n = 69, 72%). Both tumor progression on waiting list (hazard ratio [HR] 4.973; range1.599-15.464; p = 0.006) and peak alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) at 400 ng/ml or higher (HR, 4.604; range 1.660-12.768; p = 0.003) were independently associated with waiting list dropout. Post-LT HCC recurrence occurred in 35% of the patients (n = 24). Among those with HCC recurrence, survival was significantly better for those who received curative treatment (p = 0.004). The overall actuarial survival rates from the listing were 76% at 1 year, 56% at 3 years, and 47% at 5 years, and the corresponding rates from LT were 93, 71, and 66%. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation provides significantly better survival rates than palliation for patients with selected advanced HCC.

Presacral Myelolipoma: Diagnosis on Imaging With Pathologic and Clinical Correlation.

OBJECTIVE: Myelolipoma is a benign tumor composed of fatty and hematopoietic elements. Presacral myelolipoma is rare, with fewer than 40 cases reported in the English literature. It is important to make an accurate diagnosis because there are malignant diseases included in the differential diagnosis of a presacral fatty mass, particularly liposarcoma. CONCLUSION: The combination of a well-encapsulated fat-containing presacral mass, lack of coinciding hematologic disease, and uptake on sulfur colloid scintigraphy support the diagnosis of a presacral myelolipoma.

Evaluation of percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsies of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: a center's 10-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and complication rates of percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided pancreatic mass biopsy and to determine if location of the mass or method of biopsy affects efficacy. METHODS: Imaging, pathology, and clinical records of all patients undergoing percutaneous US-guided pancreatic mass sampling from January 2001 until November 2011 were reviewed. Of 88 pancreatic masses, 13 underwent fine needle aspiration (FNA) only, 60 underwent core needle biopsy only, and 15 underwent both. Diagnostic rate, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) based on location of the mass (head/neck vs. body/tail) and method of biopsy (core vs. FNA vs. combined) were determined. The final diagnosis was determined on the basis of follow-up imaging, clinical course, and/or surgical pathology. Complications were assessed by reviewing clinical notes and postprocedural imaging. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic rate, sensitivity, accuracy, and NPV of all 88 biopsies were 94%, 93%, 93%, and 57%, respectively. Five samples were nondiagnostic and considered false negatives. There were no false-positive biopsy results. No significant difference was observed in the diagnostic rate, sensitivity, accuracy, and NPV between core biopsies, FNAs, and combined core and FNA biopsies. Furthermore, no significant difference was found between head/neck and body/tail samplings. In 96.7% (85/88) of the cases, the procedure was uneventful. There were no major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous US-guided sampling of pancreatic mass is safe and effective irrespective of location of the mass and method of biopsy.

The expanding role of MRI in prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the many evolving facets of MRI in the evaluation of prostate cancer. We will discuss the roles of multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and MR spectroscopy, as adjuncts to morphologic T2-weighted imaging in detection, staging, treatment planning, and surveillance of prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Radiologists need to understand the advantages, limitations, and potential pitfalls of the different sequences to provide optimal assessment of prostate cancer.