ABSTRACT
A cohort of children in North-East Thailand was followed from birth to 2 years of age in an attempt to throw light on factors determining the development of stunting in linear growth. By 2 years the group as a whole had an average deficit in height of nearly -2 standard deviations. Those index children whose sibs were stunted had larger deficits than those with normal sibs. Their mothers were also shorter and lighter. These findings suggest that it is possible to think in terms of stunted families. No differences were identified in socio-economic factors and the prevalence of infection was in general low. Dietary intakes estimated by 24-hour recall, supplemented at 1 and 2 years by 24 h weighing, were satisfactory for most nutrients except iron, calcium and niacin. Intakes of Ca and P were lower in the more stunted children. A number of variables were measured in urine and blood at 1 and 2 years but few relationships could be established with the degree of stunting. Excretions of calcium and phosphorus showed weak negative correlations with height. On average the serum concentration of calcium was satisfactory but that of phosphorus was somewhat low. Concentrations of somatomedin C, thyroxin and vitamin D were within reported normal ranges, with no relation to the degree of stunting. From a comparison of the linear growth of these children with the results of other reports from Thailand it is suggested that environmental factors have produced stunting in the cohort as a whole, but the cohort is essentially homogeneous, showing within it a normal range of genetic variation. If that is so, major differences in intake or biochemistry between the taller and shorter children would not be expected. The problem remains of why the group as a whole is stunted. This is the first systematic attempt to assess biochemical factors that may be related to stunting in Third World children; these results are essentially negative, although there are hints that point at a possible deficiency of calcium.
