The role of messaging services in day-to-day practice in pediatric neurosurgery, advantages of a bubble network, and an international survey.

INTRODUCTION: Messaging services (MS) are used widely worldwide. The implications of MS usage in daily hospital patient care have not been investigated. In this study, we discuss the extensive usage of MS in our Pediatric Neurosurgical Department, introduce our bubble algorithm, and provide additional input from an international survey. METHODS: WhatsApp activity in the department of pediatric neurosurgery at Dana Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel, was analyzed. We designed a graphic representation of the content of the different conversation bubbles and how they interact. We also described a survey evaluating MS use in daily neurosurgical practice was sent to 25 neurosurgeons around the world. Collected data included details on the usage of MS, the type of information being transferred, and the participants' opinion of the potential risks and benefits of these systems. We began collecting messaging data November 2018, before the COVID pandemic era. We continued to collect data over the course of almost 3 years. RESULTS: We identified a bubble network structure that reflects a logical method of communication between different segments of pediatric neurosurgical care in our institution. Additionally, we analyzed 22 survey responses, received from 14 different countries. The vast majority of centers with "department groups" use messaging services to transfer multimedia files of patient-related data. Nineteen responders believe that MS significantly improve overall patient care. CONCLUSION: MS has revolutionized and improved the patterns of communication in our department. The great benefits of quick, simple access to information strongly outweigh formality and the potential for medicolegal disadvantages (e.g., HIPAA).

Current trends in pediatric moyamoya: a survey of international practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: Moyamoya angiopathy (MM) is a chronic, progressive steno-occlusive arteriopathy of the distal internal carotid artery and its proximal branches. MM is recognized as a shared end-pathway common to a broad range of inciting pathologies, suggesting that tailored management is important. Pediatric MM differs from MM in adults. Currently, there are many uncertainties and controversies regarding the diagnosis and management of children with MM. Hence, we conducted an international survey to identify the contemporary management trends followed worldwide. METHODS: A survey relating to lifestyle modifications, medical management, diagnosis, surgical management, and follow-up for pediatric MM was circulated across web-based platforms, through various international pediatric neurological and neurosurgical societies. Data collected included geographic region of practice, experience, responses to questions, and comments. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven responses were evaluated (104 neurosurgeons and 23 neurologists, from 32 countries, across 6 continents). We found wide variations in the recommendations for management and lifestyle modification, with significant differences between regions of practice. Eighty percent recommend restrictions on physical activity, particularly for symptomatic and non-operated patients. Eighty-four percent prescribe aspirin. Sixty-five percent perform indirect revascularization. Seventy-eight percent recommend performing a staged surgery for bilateral MM. Only 26% perform acetazolamide challenge SPECT to evaluate brain perfusion. Only 15% of responders were from highly experienced centers. CONCLUSION: This survey reflects the contemporary trends in management of pediatric MM, while highlighting the heterogeneity in the management approach of these patients. There is a need for multicenter, international studies to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcome of various aspects of treatment of these patients.

Does pre-resection endoscopic third ventriculostomy prevent the need for post-resection CSF diversion after pediatric posterior fossa tumor excision? A historical cohort study and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Children with posterior fossa tumors (PFTs) may present with hydrocephalus. Persistent (or new) hydrocephalus is common after PFT resection. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is sometimes performed prior to resection to 1) temporize hydrocephalus prior to resection and 2) prophylactically treat post-resection hydrocephalus. The objective of this study was to establish, in a historical cohort study of pediatric patients who underwent primary craniotomy for PFT resection, whether or not pre-resection ETV prevents the need for post-resection CSF diversion to manage hydrocephalus. METHODS: The authors interrogated their prospectively maintained surgical neuro-oncology database to find all primary PFT resections from a single tertiary pediatric neurosurgery unit. These data were reviewed and supplemented with data from case notes and radiological review. The modified Canadian Preoperative Prediction Rule for Hydrocephalus (mCPPRH) score was retrospectively calculated for all patients. The primary outcome was the need for any form of postoperative CSF diversion within 6 months of PFT resection (including ventriculoperitoneal shunting, ETV, external ventricular drainage [EVD], and lumbar drainage [LD]). This was considered an ETV failure in the ETV group. The secondary outcomes were time to CSF diversion, shunt dependence at 6 months, and complications of ETV. Statistical analysis was done in RStudio, with significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included in the study. There were 28 patients in the ETV group and 67 in the non-ETV group. Patients in the ETV group were younger (median age 5 vs 7 years, p = 0.04) and had more severe preoperative hydrocephalus (mean frontal-occipital horn ratio 0.45 vs 0.41 in the non-ETV group, p = 0.003) and higher mCPPRH scores (mean 4.42 vs 2.66, p < 0.001). The groups were similar in terms of sex and tumor histology. The overall rate of post-resection CSF diversion of any kind (shunt, repeat ETV, LD, or EVD) in the entire cohort was 25.26%. Post-resection CSF diversion was needed in 32% of patients in the ETV group and in 22% of the patients in the non-ETV group (p > 0.05). Shunt dependence at 6 months was seen in 21% of the ETV group and 16% of the non-ETV group (p > 0.05). The median time to ETV failure was 9 days. ETV failure correlated with patients with ependymoma (p = 0.02). Children who had ETV failure had higher mCPPRH scores than the ETV success group (5.67 vs 3.84, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-resection ETV did not reliably prevent the need for post-resection CSF diversion. ETV was more likely to fail in children with ependymoma and those with higher mCPPRH scores. Based on the findings of this study, the authors will change the practice at their institution; pre-resection ETV will now be performed based on a newly defined protocol.