The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults.

The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR) has herein drafted clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis for the people of India. Implementation of the position statement in clinical practice is expected to improve the overall care of patients with osteoporosis in India. PURPOSE: In India, osteoporosis is a major public health problem. However, in the absence of any robust regional guidelines, the screening, treatment, and follow-up of patients with osteoporosis are lagging behind in the country. METHODS: The Indian Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ISBMR), which is a multidisciplinary group of physicians, researchers, dietitians, and epidemiologists and who study bone and related tissues, in their annual meeting, drafted the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis that would be appropriate in a resource constraint setting like India. RESULTS: Diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in a patient with minimal trauma fracture without the aid of any other diagnostic tools. In others, bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry remains the modality of choice. Data indicates that osteoporotic fractures occur at an earlier age in Indians than in the West; hence, screening for osteoporosis should begin at an earlier age. FRAX can be used for fracture risk estimation; however, it may underestimate the risk of future fractures in our population and still needs validation. Maintaining optimum serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels is essential, which, in most cases, would require regular vitamin D supplementation. Pharmacotherapy should be guided by the presence/absence of vertebral/hip fractures or the severity of risk based on clinical factors, although bisphosphonates remain the first choice in most cases. Regular follow-up is essential to ensure adherence and response to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the position statement in clinical practice is expected to improve the overall care of patients with osteoporosis in India.

Evidence-Based Consensus on Positioning of SGLT2i in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Indians.

The current diabetes management strategies not only aim at controlling glycaemic parameters but also necessitate continuous medical care along with multifactorial risk reduction through a comprehensive management concept. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a group of evolving antidiabetic agents that have the potential to play a pivotal role in the comprehensive management of patients with diabetes due to their diverse beneficial effects. SGLT2i provide moderate glycaemic control, considerable body weight and blood pressure reduction, and thus have the ability to lower the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications. Some of the unique characteristics associated with SGLT2i, such as reduction in body weight (more visceral fat mass loss than subcutaneous fat loss), reduction in insulin resistance and improvement in ß-cell function, as measured by homeostatic model assessment-ß (HOMA-ß) could be potentially beneficial and help in overcoming some of the challenges faced by Indian patients with diabetes. In addition, a patient-centric approach with individualised treatment during SGLT2i therapy is inevitable in order to reduce diabetic complications and improve quality of life. Despite their broad benefits profile, the risk of genital tract infections, volume depletion, amputations and diabetic ketoacidosis associated with SGLT2i should be carefully monitored. In this compendium, we systematically reviewed the literature from Medline, Cochrane Library, and other relevant databases and attempted to provide evidence-based recommendations for the positioning of SGLT2i in the management of diabetes in the Indian population.Funding: AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited.

Efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination of atorvastatin and hydroxychloroquine: a randomized, double-blind comparison with atorvastatin alone among Indian patients with dyslipidemia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin + hydroxychloroquine fixed-dose combination tablets in comparison with atorvastatin alone in treatment of dyslipidemia. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, out-patient study was conducted in 328 patients with primary dyslipidemia having low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) to ≤ 250 mg/dL (6.48 mmol/L) and triglycerides ≤ 400 mg/dL (4.52 mmol/L). Eligible patients were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 167) or atorvastatin 10 mg + hydroxychloroquine 200 mg (n = 161) for 24 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2010/091/006138. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To compare percentage change in LDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) from baseline to Week 12 and Week 24 between groups. To compare mean change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), and percentage of patients achieving lipid goals at Week 12 and Week 24. RESULTS: At Week 24, percentage reduction in LDL-C (-32.52 [-36.13 to -28.91] vs -39.54 [-43.25 to -35.83]; p = 0.008), TC (-24.41 [-27.10 to -21.72] vs -29.30 [-32.07 to -26.54]; p = 0.013), and non-HDL-C (-30.37 [-33.71 to -27.04] vs -36.76 [-40.18 to -33.33]; p = 0.009) was significantly greater in combination treated patients. Both the treatments showed a significant reduction in triglycerides at Week 24 from baseline, however, this reduction was not statistically significantly different between treatment groups. No significant change in HDL-C was observed in patients from both the treatment groups. At Week 24, change in HbA1c (0.22 [0.07 to 0.37] vs -0.13 [-0.28 to 0.03]; p = 0.002) and FBG was also statistically significant in favor of combination therapy (0.37 [0.07 to 0.67] vs -0.29 [-0.59 to 0.03]; p = 0.003), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in change in Hs-CRP (p = 0.310). Significantly more patients from the combination group achieved LDL-C and TC goals. Exploratory analysis in patients with pre-diabetes showed development of diabetes in 8 patients (15.09%) from the monotherapy group and 1 patient (1.96%) from the combination group (p = 0.034). Study medications were generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Based on study results and widely reported pleiotropic benefits, hydroxychloroquine could emerge as a potential drug for combination with statins for treatment of dyslipidemia. Long duration studies with larger sample sizes are required to further explore the role of hydroxychloroquine as adjunct to statins in reducing risk of cardiovascular events and prevention of statin-induced diabetes.

Liraglutide: A review of its therapeutic use as a once daily GLP-1 analog for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Even though progress have been accomplished in the management of type 2 diabetes, current treatment preferences for patients with this disease still fall short to address disease progression. With the present therapy, glycaemic control remains suboptimal and are often associated with weight gain and hypoglycaemia. Glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone secreted from the small intestine that lowers fasting and postprandial glucose through multiple mechanisms including glucose-dependent insulin secretion, reduction of glucagon secretion, delaying gastric emptying and increased satiety. Liraglutide, a human glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogue is a treatment for T2DM that is administered as a once-daily subcutaneous injection. The efficacy and tolerability of liraglutide at doses of 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg for T2DM, in combination with, and compared with, other T2DM treatments were investigated in the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) Phase III clinical trial program. In the LEAD trial, treatment with liraglutide was associated with substantial improvements in glycaemic control and low risk of hypoglycaemia. In addition liraglutide significantly improved ß-cell function, reduced systolic blood pressure (BP) and induced weight loss. Overall, liraglutide was well tolerated. Recent data on safety and efficacy of liraglutide from real-life clinical practice settings also reiterate the better therapeutic profile of this molecule. Based on results from the LEAD programme, and real-life clinical experience, liraglutide has been demonstrated as an effective therapeutic intervention even at the early stage of diabetes regardless of with what, it has been used.

Postmenopausal Evaluation and Risk Reduction With Lasofoxifene (PEARL) trial: 5-year gynecological outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the gynecological effects of 5 years of treatment with lasofoxifene versus placebo in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. METHODS: A total of 8,556 women aged 59 to 80 years with femoral neck or spine bone mineral density T scores of -2.5 or lower were randomized to receive lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day, or lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/day, or placebo, for 5 years. RESULTS: Endometrial cancer was confirmed for two women in each lasofoxifene group and for three women in the placebo group. Endometrial hyperplasia occurred in three, two, and zero women in the lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day, lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/day, and placebo groups, respectively. Vaginal bleeding occurred in 2.2% (P = 0.012 vs placebo), 2.6% (P = 0.001 vs placebo), and 1.3% of women treated with 0.25 mg/day lasofoxifene, 0.5 mg/day lasofoxifene, and placebo, respectively. Lasofoxifene treatment resulted in a small increase in endometrial thickness versus placebo (least-squares mean change from baseline 1.19 mm [P = 0.001], 1.43 mm [P < 0.001], and -0.72 mm for 0.25 mg/day lasofoxifene, 0.5 mg/day lasofoxifene, and placebo). Similar numbers of women required surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence in the placebo and 0.5 mg/day lasofoxifene groups (1.2% vs 1.6%, P = 0.224; 0.25 mg/day group: 1.9%, P = 0.036). The absolute incidence rates of endometrial polyps were 8.8%, 5.5%, and 3.3% for lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day (P = 0.003 vs placebo), lasofoxifene 0.5 mg/day (P = 0.163 vs placebo), and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that 5 years of lasofoxifene treatment result in benign endometrial changes that do not increase the risk for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia in postmenopausal women.

BMD reference standards among South Asians in the United States.

The relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk is not well established for non-white populations. There is no established BMD reference standard for South Asians. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to measure BMD at total hip and lumbar spine in 150 US-based South-Asian Indians. For each subject, T-scores were calculated using BMD reference values based on US white, North Indian, and South Indian populations, and the resulting WHO BMD category assignments were compared. Reference standards derived from Indian populations classified a larger proportion of US-based Indians as normal than did US white-based standards. The percentage of individuals reclassified when changing between reference standards varied by skeletal site and reference population origin, ranging from 13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7-18%), when switching from US white- to North Indian-based standard for total hip, to 40% (95% CI: 32-48%), when switching from US white to South Indian reference values for lumbar spine. These findings illustrate that choice of reference standard has a significant effect on the diagnosis of osteoporosis in South Asians, and underscore the importance of future research to quantify the relationship between BMD and fracture risk in this population.

Lasofoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of lasofoxifene on the risk of fractures, breast cancer, and cardiovascular disease are uncertain. METHODS: In this randomized trial, we assigned 8556 women who were between the ages of 59 and 80 years and had a bone mineral density T score of -2.5 or less at the femoral neck or spine to receive once-daily lasofoxifene (at a dose of either 0.25 mg or 0.5 mg) or placebo for 5 years. Primary end points were vertebral fractures, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, and nonvertebral fractures; secondary end points included major coronary heart disease events and stroke. RESULTS: Lasofoxifene at a dose of 0.5 mg per day, as compared with placebo, was associated with reduced risks of vertebral fracture (13.1 cases vs. 22.4 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.70), nonvertebral fracture (18.7 vs. 24.5 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91), ER-positive breast cancer (0.3 vs. 1.7 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56), coronary heart disease events (5.1 vs. 7.5 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.93), and stroke (2.5 vs. 3.9 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.99). Lasofoxifene at a dose of 0.25 mg per day, as compared with placebo, was associated with reduced risks of vertebral fracture (16.0 vs. 22.4 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.83) and stroke (2.4 vs. 3.9 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.96) Both the lower and higher doses, as compared with placebo, were associated with an increase in venous thromboembolic events (3.8 and 2.9 cases vs. 1.4 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratios, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.55 to 4.58] and 2.06 [95% CI, 1.17 to 3.60], respectively). Endometrial cancer occurred in three women in the placebo group, two women in the lower-dose lasofoxifene group, and two women in the higher-dose lasofoxifene group. Rates of death per 1000 person-years were 5.1 in the placebo group, 7.0 in the lower-dose lasofoxifene group, and 5.7 in the higher-dose lasofoxifene group. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, lasofoxifene at a dose of 0.5 mg per day was associated with reduced risks of nonvertebral and vertebral fractures, ER-positive breast cancer, coronary heart disease, and stroke but an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00141323.)

Tumoral calcinosis with vitamin D deficiency.

A 50-year-old woman presented with recurrent calcified mass in the left gluteal region. The clinical, radiological, and biochemical profile confirmed the diagnosis of tumoral calcinosis. She also had associated vitamin D deficiency. The patient underwent surgical removal of the mass to relieve the sciatic nerve compression and was managed with acetazolamide, calcium carbonate, and aluminium hydroxide gel with which she showed significant improvement. The management implications and effect of vitamin D deficiency on phosphate metabolism in the setting of tumoral calcinosis is discussed.

Efficacy of teriparatide in increasing bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis--an Indian experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is emerging as a leading cause of substantial morbidity in India, particularly in postmenopausal women. Teriparatide (recombinant human parathyroid hormone [1-34]) increases bone formation and improves bone microarchitecture, thereby reducing the risk of fractures. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of teriparatide in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomised, prospective, multicentre, open-label, controlled study was conducted on 82 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis. Patients were randomly divided into control and teriparatide groups, each group consisting of 41 patients. All the patients were supplemented with 1000 mg of elemental calcium and 500 IU of vitamin D throughout the study period of 180 days. Besides, teriparatide group patients were administered teriparatide 20 microg daily subcutaneously. Lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip BMD, bone mineral content (BMC) and bone area were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and at the end of 6 months of treatment. Bone biomarkers, such as serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and serum osteocalcin (OC), representing bone formation, and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), representing bone resorption were assessed at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: During the study period, 9 patients (11%) were lost to follow-up--6 in control group (7.3%) and 3 in teriparatide group (3.7%). There was an excellent compliance to both oral and injectable medication. The investigational product teriparatide was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events. In addition, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of adverse events. The percentage of increase in lumbar spine BMD, which is the primary endpoint, was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in teriparatide group compared to that in control group (6.58% vs. 1.06%). Further, teriparatide significantly increased percentage of change in lumbar spine T-score (P < 0.001), BMC (P < 0.001) and bone area (P < 0.028) compared to control group at 6 months. Administration of teriparatide resulted in a significant percentage of increase in all the bone biomarkers in teriparatide group compared to control group patients at 3 and 6 months over baseline, thereby showing that there was a significant increase in bone turnover in teriparatide group of patients. CONCLUSION: These results show that teriparatide is an effective and safe drug in increasing the BMD and therefore, teriparatide provides yet another new therapeutic option for reducing the risk management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women (clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00500409).

Efficacy and safety of raloxifene 60 milligrams/day in postmenopausal Asian women.

In healthy Caucasian postmenopausal women, raloxifene increases bone mineral density (BMD), decreases biochemical markers of bone turnover, and lowers low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, without effects on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides. This randomized, double-blind study examines the effects of raloxifene 60 mg/d (n = 483) or placebo (n = 485) in healthy postmenopausal Asian women (mean age 57 yr) from Australia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand. Serum osteocalcin, serum N-telopeptide, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Lumbar spine BMD was measured at baseline and 1 yr in 309 women from 4 countries. Clinical adverse events were recorded at each interim visit. At 6 months, raloxifene 60 mg/d significantly decreased osteocalcin, N-telopeptide, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol by medians of 15.9%, 14.6%, 5.3%, and 7.7%, respectively, from placebo. Changes in HDL cholesterol and triglycerides were similar between raloxifene and placebo. Raloxifene 60 mg/d increased mean lumbar spine BMD (1.9%) from placebo at 1 yr (P = 0.0003). The incidences of hot flashes (placebo 3.5%, raloxifene 5.6%, P = 0.12), and leg cramps (placebo 2.7%, raloxifene 4.3%, P = 0.16) were not different between groups. No case of venous thromboembolism was reported. The effects of raloxifene 60 mg/d on bone turnover, BMD, and serum lipids in healthy postmenopausal Asian women were similar to that previously reported in Caucasian women.