ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate bacterial leakage and marginal adaptation of bioceramic apical plugs. METHODS: Extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared to simulate open apex using No. 4 Peeso reamer in retrograde direction. In total, 150 specimens were divided into 10 groups by obturation with five bioceramics in two thicknesses. Groups 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 were obturated with ProRootMTA, Biodentine, TotalFill BC RRM paste, TotalFill BC RRM putty, and RetroMTA at 3 mm, and groups 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 were obturated with the same materials at 4 mm. Ten specimens in each group were evaluated for bacterial leakage of Enterococcus faecalis for 75 days. Five specimens from each group were sectioned to investigate the gap area under scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The 3- and 4-mm Biodentine and TotalFill BC RRM putty groups and the 4-mm ProRootMTA group exhibited less bacterial leakage and lower mean percentage of gap area than those of the other groups. TotalFill BC RRM paste showed the highest leakage for both the 3- and 4-mm groups. CONCLUSION: The 3- and 4-mm Biodentine and TotalFill BC RRM putty groups and the 4-mm ProRootMTA group exhibited the best sealing ability and marginal adaptation of apical plugs.
Subject(s)
Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Leakage/prevention & control , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Materials Testing , Root Canal Obturation/methods , Tooth Apex , Aluminum Compounds , Bicuspid , Calcium Compounds , Dental Leakage/microbiology , Dental Materials/chemistry , Drug Combinations , Enterococcus faecalis , Gutta-Percha , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Oxides , Root Canal Filling Materials , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Silicates , Tooth Apex/anatomy & histology , Tooth Apex/drug effects , Tooth Root/anatomy & histologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of lidocaine (LD) topical anesthetic spray against oral microflora. METHODS: Antimicrobial effects of 10% LD spray were assessed against six bacterial cultures obtained from volunteers: Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus sanguinis. The filter papers contained 50-µl LD, brain heart infusion (BHI) broth, or 0.2% chlorhexidine. Papers were placed on the cultured blood plates for 1-3 min. After the papers were removed, plates were incubated for 24 h. Bacterial growth on the contact areas was recorded as the antimicrobial score. The split mouth technique was use in for sample collection in clinical study. Filter papers soaked with either BHI broth or LD were placed on the right or left buccal mucosa for 1 min, and replaced with other papers to imprint biofilms onto the contact areas. Papers were placed on blood plates, incubated for 24 h, and antimicrobial scores were determined. Experiments were conducted for 2- and 3-min exposure times with a 1-day washout period. RESULTS: LD exhibited bactericidal effects against E. coli, S. sanguinis, and S. salivarius within 1 min but displayed no effect against S. aureus, E. faecalis, and S. pyogenes. The antimicrobial effect of LD on oral microflora depended upon exposure time, similar to the results obtained from the clinical study (P < 0.05). LD showed 60-95% biofilm reduction on buccal mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial activity of 10% LD topical anesthetic spray was increased by exposure time. The 3 min application reduced oral microflora in the buccal mucosa.
