Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 16(5): e60195, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dementia poses a significant public health challenge worldwide, necessitating a deeper understanding of its risk factors to inform preventive strategies. METHOD: This retrospective longitudinal study leveraged clinical data from a tertiary care database to investigate the risk factors associated with an incident dementia diagnosis. The study cohort comprised individuals aged 50 years and older. Key variables including age, income, comorbidities such as depressive disorder, osteoporosis, stroke, and metabolic conditions like type 2 diabetes and hypertension were analyzed by using Cox regression analysis. RESULT: The study cohort included 127,016 adults 50 years and older. The results revealed that advancing age, with individuals aged 70-79 years having a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.9 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6-5.8), and those aged 80 years and above having an HR of 11.6 (95% CI, 7.7-17.3), lower income status (patients with no income or occupation had a notably higher risk of dementia diagnosis, with an HR of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-2.8)), depressive disorder (HR of 3.3 (95% CI, 3.3-3.7)), osteoporosis (HR of 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1-1.4)), and stroke (HR of 2.5 (95% CI, 2.3-2.7)) were significantly associated with an increased risk of incident dementia. However, no significant associations were observed for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity, or underweight status managed in tertiary care. CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the importance of considering a wide range of factors in understanding dementia risk and highlight the potential utility of routinely collected clinical data for comprehensive risk assessment. Further investigation into additional variables and multi-center studies may provide deeper insights into the complex interplay of risk factors contributing to dementia onset.

2.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 24(3): 263-268, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286739

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to validate a Yubi-wakka (finger-ring) test to identify older adults at risk for sarcopenia. Generally, measurements of muscle mass are considered to be a gold standard for testing for sarcopenia; such measurements are typically attained using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, the Yubi-wakka test is a simple assessment that can also be used to screen for sarcopenia. METHODS: An analytic cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Yubi-wakka test. The study cohort included 230 adults older than 60 years who had no disabilities or handicaps and who visited the outpatient department of Phramongkutklao Hospital. Each participant underwent the Yubi-wakka test, a handgrip strength test, the 5-chair stand test, and BIA. We analyzed the associations between the Yubi-wakka test results and sarcopenia. The findings were compared with diagnoses that followed from the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019. RESULTS: The test results were statistically associated with sarcopenia ("just fits" odds ratio [OR]: 8.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.29-22.18, and "smaller" OR: 10.73, 95% CI: 4.31-26.73, relative to "bigger"). The sensitivity and specificity of the Yubi-wakka test in men were 85.7% and 71.2% (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.785, 95% CI: 0.618-0.952), respectively. For women, the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 87.5% and 80.8% (AUC: 0.842, 95% CI: 0.764-0.919), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Yubi-wakka test is a practical way of identifying the risk of sarcopenia among the elderly; it exhibits promising sensitivity and specificity. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 263-268.


Subject(s)
Sarcopenia , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Hand Strength , Cross-Sectional Studies , Thailand , Sensitivity and Specificity , Muscle, Skeletal
3.
Health Econ ; 25 Suppl 1: 162-78, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26774008

ABSTRACT

This study reports the systematic development of a population-based health screening package for all Thai people under the universal health coverage (UHC). To determine major disease areas and health problems for which health screening could mitigate health burden, a consultation process was conducted in a systematic, participatory, and evidence-based manner that involved 41 stakeholders in a half-day workshop. Twelve diseases/health problems were identified during the discussion. Subsequently, health technology assessments, including systematic review and meta-analysis of health benefits as well as economic evaluations and budget impact analyses of corresponding population-based screening interventions, were completed. The results led to advice against elements of current clinical practice, such as annual chest X-rays and particular blood tests (e.g. kidney function test), and indicated that the introduction of certain new population-based health screening programs, such as for chronic hepatitis B, would provide substantial health and economic benefits to the Thais. The final results were presented to a wide group of stakeholders, including decision-makers at the Ministry of Public Health and the public health insurance schemes, to verify and validate the findings and policy recommendations. The package has been endorsed by the Thai UHC Benefit Package Committee for implementation in fiscal year 2016.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Mass Screening/economics , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Decision Making , Developing Countries , Economics, Medical , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Research , Humans , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/economics , Thailand
4.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 96(2): 251-8, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23936994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dementia will inevitably increase in the aging world. Moreover there is no cure for dementia. Therefore, primary prevention is very important. There are several factors possibly and/or certainly influencing dementia risk including non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors. There are evidences that the risk of developing dementia may be reduced by modifiable risk factors. LIFESTYLE FACTORS: The strategies are to encourage regular physical and mental exercise in midlife and in late-life. Those include cognitive activity and higher education, mentally demanding occupations or participation in mentally challenging leisure activities, being more socially active, a diet that is low in saturated fat, a diet with lots of fruits and vegetables, smoking cessation, and prevention of head injury, with loss of consciousness. Chronic disease factors: The strategies are to prevent high blood pressure, especially at midlife, diabetes, high serum cholesterol, especially at midlife, and depression or high depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: It is important to develop a systematic public-health strategy and research specific to primary prevention of dementia in Thailand with the evidence-based medicine.


Subject(s)
Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/prevention & control , Primary Prevention , Alcohol Drinking , Depression/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...