Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ind Psychiatry J ; 32(2): 323-327, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38161455

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Limb amputation is an extremely stressful event for an individual, following which the amputee develops inferior body image, anxiety, and changes in self-concept and identity. For holistic rehabilitation, understanding the psychosocial status of the amputee and its' predictors is of utmost importance. Objective: The aim of the article is to assess the psychological adjustments in patients with lower limb amputation and determine its clinical and sociodemographic correlates. Material and Methods: A observational cross-sectional study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 among lower limb amputees of a tertiary care hospital in Lucknow which serves as the only rehabilitation and artificial limb center for the whole state of Uttar Pradesh. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to determine underlying depression and anxiety, while the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale was used for understanding the psychological adjustment. Results: The mean age of the amputee was 39.47 ± 16.99 years. The mean general, social adjustment, and adjustment to limitation score was 16.3 ± 3.34, 15.19 ± 3.59, and 12.76 ± 3.15, respectively. Male amputees, aged >40 years, and pensioners had significantly higher scores for general adjustment (P < 0.05). Those aged >40 years were pensioners and had no underlying depression and anxiety and had better social adjustment (P < 0.05). Those with transfemoral amputation had a significantly lesser adjustment to limitation (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Young age amputees had poor general and social adjustments and more activity restriction but high prosthesis satisfaction as compared to the elderly. Those with transfemoral amputation had a poor adjustment to limitation while those wearing above-knee prosthesis had more activity restriction.

2.
Indian J Anaesth ; 67(11): 985-990, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38213687

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: Thoracolumbar spine surgery is one of the most painful surgical procedures. This study's primary objective was to evaluate the effect of erector spinae plane (ESP) block on post-operative cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Methods: Seventy adults posted for thoracolumbar spine surgery were randomised into the control group [Number of patients (n)=35], who received general anaesthesia without any nerve block, and the intervention group (n = 35), who received bilateral ultrasound (US)-guided ESP block at the level of spine surgery with 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL after standard general anaesthesia. Along with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine, post-operative analgesia was standardised for both groups. Total morphine consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS) score to evaluate pain, overall patient satisfaction, and any side effects were compared at 24 h. The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results: Post-operative total morphine consumption at 24 h was significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group [5.69 (1.549) versus 9.51 (1.634) mg; P < 0.001]. Post-operative VAS scores were also significantly decreased in the intervention group at rest (P < 0.001) and on movement (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction scores were more favourable in the intervention group [3.8 (0.4) versus 3.2 (0.6); P < 0.001]. Post-operative nausea and vomiting were found more in the control group but were not significant (n = 14 versus 8; P = 0.127). Conclusion: US-guided ESP block significantly reduces post-operative morphine consumption and improves analgesia and patient satisfaction without adverse effects in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery.

3.
J Midlife Health ; 11(4): 224-230, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33767563

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal women are at highest risk of developing osteoporosis, since their bone mineral density is reduced due to decrease in estrogen level. Various other physiological, emotional, and psychological changes jeopardize the health of these vulnerable females in total and reduce their quality of life (QoL). AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the QoL and bone mass density (BMD) among normal BMD, osteopenic, and osteoporotic postmenopausal women. SETTING AND DESIGN: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the outpatient department of physical medicine and rehabilitation at a tertiary care center of northern India from August 2019 to February 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline sociodemographic characteristics of all postmenopausal women were collected using a quantitative tool. Assessment of QoL was done by pretested and validated QUALEFFO-41 scale. For all the women, a bone mineral densitometry test was performed on the L1-L4 lumbar spine, femoral neck, and forearm by the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way ANOVA test was used to compare the mean BMD values across the three groups. Determination of predictive factors for QoL was performed using stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences were noted for the mean values of the three domains, i.e., pain, physical, and social function (P < 0.01). Women with osteoporosis had significantly higher pain scores as compared to others. Among those with osteoporosis, the pain scores have significantly increased gradually as age increases. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis have poor QoL as compared to those with normal BMD.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...