Evaluation of psychosocial and biological parameters in women seeking for a caesarean section and women who are aiming for vaginal delivery: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To investigate psychosocial and biological parameters that may influence decision-making concerning the mode of delivery in women with caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR). METHODS: Two hundred and two women were enrolled prospectively. The study sample (n = 93) consisted of women who aimed for CSMR, the control sample were women who seeked for vaginal delivery (n = 109). Parturients of both samples were enrolled during the pre-birth counselling at the delivery room at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Germany. Women completed standardised questionnaires regarding psychosocial burden (SCL-R 90), fear of childbirth (W-DEQ) and anxiety (STAI), personality structure (HEXACO-Pi-R), and ambiguity tolerance (PFI, PNS, and NFC), social support (F-SozU) as well as one questionnaire assessing demographic parameters and further factors potentially influencing their choice of the mode of delivery. Hair cortisol concentration as a marker for chronic psychological stress and pressure pain threshold with a pressure algometer was assessed. RESULTS: Women in the CSMR sample had less social support (F-SozU: 2.99 ± 0.52 vs. 3.12 ± 0.32; p = 0.043) and were less educated (high school or university degree: 37 vs. 71%, p = 0.001) compared to parturients of the control sample. Women who underwent CSMR were less open-minded (HEXACO-Pi-R: 3.08 ± 0.57 vs. 3.26 ± 0.50; p = 0.016) and less extroverted (HEXACO-Pi-R: 3.34 ± 0.36 vs. 3.46 ± 0.41; p = 0.041). The control collective showed higher scores in negative appraisal of the birth ('W-DEQ-negative appraisal': 2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9; p = 0.006), whereas "lack of positive anticipation" was higher in the study collective ('W-DEQ-lack of positive anticipation': 3.2 ± 1.2 vs. 2.8 ± 0.8; p = 0.015). The study collective had higher pressure pain threshold values (5.07 ± 2.06 vs. 4.35 ± 1.38; p = 0.007), while no significant differences were observed in hair cortisol concentration comparing both groups (5.0 ± 11.4 vs. 4.9 ± 8.3; p = 0.426). The majority of the control collective (80%) had chosen the vaginal route as their mode of delivery before pregnancy, whereas only 21% of the women in the study collective decided to undergo CSMR before conception. The advice of social sources including both medical and non-medical aspects was rated less important in the study sample, with significant differences indicating a lower relevance of counsel from friends (p = 0.002) and midwives (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women who inquired a CSMR had lower social support, were less educated, more anxious, and had a lower sensitivity for physical pain compared to women seeking for spontaneous delivery. This should be considered when counselling women requiring CSMR and could be leverage points to intervene to reduce the continuously increasing CSMR rate.

Elective Caesarean section on maternal request in Germany: factors affecting decision making concerning mode of delivery.

PURPOSE: To investigate sociopsychological factors of women undergoing a caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR). METHODS: Twenty-eight women who underwent CSMR and 29 women with vaginal delivery (VD) filled in standardized questionnaires concerning psychological burden (SCL-R 90), fear of childbirth (W-DEQ, STAI), personality structure (HEXACO-Pi-R) and social support (F-SozU) as well as one questionnaire assessing potential factors influencing their mode of delivery. RESULTS: Women with CSMR were older (36.5 ± 5.4 vs. 30.6 ± 5.2 years; p < 0.001) and suffered more from fear of childbirth (W-DEQ 4.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.2; p = 0.041), concerns for their child (W-DEQ 2.0 ± 1.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7; p = 0.026) and appraised the birth less negative (W-DEQ 2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 1.1; p = 0.008). The majority of parturients had chosen their preferred mode of delivery before pregnancy (CS 61% vs. VD 82%, p = 0.328). In the decision-making process for the mode of delivery, the advice of the partner (85 and 90%) played an important role. 82% of the women who delivered via CSMR did not regret the decision for this mode of delivery. CONCLUSION: Women who underwent CS had higher fear of childbirth and appraised the birth less negative. The majority did not regret the decision for the CS and would even choose this mode of delivery for their next pregnancy. Although the partner and the physician seem to be important in the decision process for of the mode of delivery, reasons for the choice for CSMR appear to be multifactorial.