A comparative case study of bowel cancer screening in the UK and Australia: evidence lost in translation?

OBJECTIVES: (i) To document the current state of the English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish and Australian bowel cancer screening programmes, according to seven key characteristics, and (ii) to explore the policy trade-offs resulting from inadequate funding. SETTING: United Kingdom and Australia. METHODS: A comparative case study design using document and key informant interview analysis. Data were collated for each national jurisdiction on seven key programme characteristics: screening frequency, population coverage, quality of test, programme model, quality of follow-up, quality of colonoscopy and quality of data collection. A list of optimal features for each of the seven characteristics was compiled, based on the FOBT screening literature and our detailed examination of each programme. RESULTS: Each country made different implementation choices or trade-offs intended to conserve costs and/or manage limited and expensive resources. The overall outcome of these trade-offs was probable lower programme effectiveness as a result of compromises such as reduced screening frequency, restricted target age range, the use of less accurate tests, the deliberate setting of low programme positivity rates or increased inconvenience to participants from re-testing. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient funding has forced programme administrators to make trade-offs that may undermine the potential net population benefits achieved in randomized controlled trials. Such policy compromise contravenes the principle of evidence-based practice which is dependent on adequate funding being made available.

Diagnostic accuracy of faecal occult blood tests used in screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) for the detection of colorectal cancer in an average-risk screening population. METHODS: Fifteen electronic databases, the internet, key journals and reference lists of included studies were searched. We included diagnostic accuracy studies that compared guaiac or immunochemical FOBTs with any reference standard, for the detection of colorectal cancer in an average-risk adult population, with sufficient data to construct a 2 x 2 table. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies were included. Thirty-three evaluated guaiac FOBTs, 35 immunochemical FOBTs and one evaluated sequential FOBTs. Sensitivities for the detection of all neoplasms ranged from 6.2% (specificity 98.0%) to 83.3% (specificity 98.4%) for guaiac FOBTs, and 5.4% (specificity 98.5%) to 62.6% (specificity 94.3%) for immunochemical FOBTs. Specificity ranged from 65.0% (sensitivity 44.1%) to 99.0% (sensitivity 19.3%) for guaiac FOBTs, and 89.4% (sensitivity 30.3%) to 98.5% (sensitivity 5.4%) for immunochemical FOBTs. Diagnostic case-control studies generally reported higher sensitivities. Sensitivities were higher for the detection of CRC, and lower for adenomas, in both the diagnostic cohort and diagnostic case-control studies for both guaiac and immunochemical FOBTs. CONCLUSIONS: Immudia HemSp appeared to be the most accurate immunochemical FOBT, however, there was no clear evidence to suggest whether guaiac or immunochemical FOBTs performed better, either from direct or indirect comparisons. Poor reporting of data limited the scope of this review, and the use the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy guidelines is recommended for reporting future diagnostic accuracy studies.

Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

The psychological impact of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) was assessed in 114 individuals (32 carriers and 82 non-carriers) attending familial cancer clinics, using mailed self-administered questionnaires prior to, 2 weeks, 4 months and 12 months after carrier status disclosure. Compared to baseline, carriers showed a significant increase in mean scores for intrusive and avoidant thoughts about colorectal cancer 2 weeks (t = 2.49; p = 0.014) and a significant decrease in mean depression scores 2 weeks post-notification of result (t = -3.98; p < 0.001) and 4 months post-notification of result (t = -3.22; p = 0.002). For non-carriers, significant decreases in mean scores for intrusive and avoidant thoughts about colorectal cancer were observed at all follow-up assessment time points relative to baseline. Non-carriers also showed significant decreases from baseline in mean depression scores 2 weeks, 4 months and 12 months post-notification. Significant decreases from baseline for mean state anxiety scores were also observed for non-carriers 2 weeks post-notification (t = -3.99; p < 0.001). These data indicate that predictive genetic testing for HNPCC leads to psychological benefits amongst non-carriers, and no adverse psychological outcomes were observed amongst carriers.

Prescreening evaluation of a brush-based faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin.

OBJECTIVES: To undertake a prescreening evaluation of a new brush-based faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin, relative to a traditional spatula-sampling immunochemical test. SETTING: Patients aged between 24 and 90 years, scheduled to undergo diagnostic colonoscopy in two major urban hospitals, for a range of clinical indications. DESIGN: Patients sampled three stools using a spatula for the reference FlexSure OBT test and two stools using a brush for the InSure test; order of sampling was randomised. Faecal haemoglobin was quantified by a modified InSure in a subset of patients to determine whether brush-sampling allowed discrimination between groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity for cancer or adenoma; false-positive rate in normals. Faecal haemoglobin levels. Preference for sampling method. RESULTS: InSure and FlexSure OBT did not differ in their sensitivities for cancer (27/36, 75% vs 29/36, 80.5%, respectively), adenomas >or= 10 mm (12/29, 41.4% vs 13/29, 44.8%) or adenomas <10 mm (each 8/56, 14.3%). Likewise, false-positive rates in normals were similar: 4/179 (2.2%) and 5/179 (2.8%) respectively (specificities of 97.8% and 97.2%, respectively). Levels of faecal haemoglobin were highest in those with cancers; those with adenomas had intermediate levels which were also significantly higher than those in normals. The brush sampling method was preferred by 38/46 (82.6%), while 4/46 (8.7%) preferred the spatula (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: InSure is as sensitive and specific as FlexSure OBT for faecal haemoglobin. The novel stool-sampling method of InSure allows discrimination between normals and classes of neoplasia, and is highly preferred. The brush-sampling faecal immunochemical test InSure should now be evaluated in a screening population.

Cancer risk in young women at risk of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: implications for gynecologic surveillance.

OBJECTIVES: The lifetime risk of endometrial and ovarian cancers in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is up to 60 and 12%, respectively, in addition to the high risk of colorectal cancer. International guidelines recommend surveillance of those at risk with colonoscopy every 1--2 years from age 20--25 years and annual gynecologic surveillance from 25--35 years for women. We reviewed our own experience to see whether these recommendations were appropriate. METHODS: Pedigrees of 120 HNPCC families registered with the Familial Bowel Cancer Service at The Royal Melbourne Hospital were reviewed. Ninety families met our criteria for HNPCC and were included in the study. Pedigrees were analyzed to identify early-age onset colorectal and gynecologic cancers and to calculate cumulative incidence of both cancer types for at-risk women (HNPCC-affected and first-degree female relatives of affected family members) for comparison with the general population. RESULTS: Colorectal cancer occurred in 434 individuals, endometrial cancer in 43, and ovarian cancer in 24. Gynecologic and colorectal cancers were diagnosed at similar ages (mean 49.3 versus 51.8 years; P = 0.25), with 5 (7.1%) gynecologic cancers diagnosed by 35 years. Cumulative incidences of gynecologic and colorectal cancers to ages 25, 30, 35, and 40 years were substantially higher among at-risk women than in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration should be given to offering gynecologic cancer surveillance from the age of 25 years, as for colorectal cancer. However, this approach should be individualized as it has yet to be demonstrated that surveillance reduces the mortality of gynecologic cancer in HNPCC.

Profuse familial adenomatous polyposis with an adenomatous polyposis coli exon 3 mutation.

The attenuated form of familial adenomatous polyposis coli (AAPC) is associated with mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene which cluster in the 5' region of the gene. It has been proposed that a 'genotype-phenotype boundary' exists at codons 159-163, and mutations that are 5' of this boundary will produce AAPC. Herein we document a three-generation family with an exon 3 mutation well to the 5' side of the proposed boundary, in which two affected individuals have had, in their 40s, a profuse form of familial adenomatous polyposis coli. We conclude that the codon 159-163 'boundary' is indicative rather than definitive. These two patients also had postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions, severely so in one.

Yield from colonoscopic screening in people with a strong family history of common colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People with a strong family history of common (so-called 'sporadic') colorectal cancer are generally advised to undergo colonoscopic screening, but the starting age for this is unclear. An audit was performed to study the age-related yield of screening colonoscopy in this risk group. METHODS: A prospective audit of the outcome of screening colonoscopy was performed on a cohort of 232 people with a strong family history of common colorectal cancer. All were registrants in a familial bowel cancer service solely because of their family medical history. They had no bowel symptoms and no prior endoscopic investigation of the large bowel. RESULTS: Neoplastic lesions were detected by using colonoscopy in 33 participants. In 27 participants, the major lesion was a small tubular adenoma, four had an advanced adenoma and two had cancer. More neoplastic (P= 0.02) and advanced neoplastic (P= 0.03) lesions were found in those patients aged > or = 50 years. Only one advanced adenoma was detected in a participant below the age of 50 years. CONCLUSION: The yield from screening colonoscopy in young people (< 50 years) with a strong family history of common colorectal cancer is low, placing doubt on the need for colonoscopic screening before the age of 50 years.

Screening for rectal cancer.

Although screening for rectal cancer remains a controversial topic, the case for screening has been strengthened by the demonstration that screening can reduce mortality from the disease. Three randomized controlled trials based on fecal occult blood testing have shown a significant reduction in overall colorectal cancer mortality in those offered testing. The case for screening based on flexible sigmoidoscopy is not as strong. Evidence from randomized controlled trials will not be available for another 8-10 years. Whatever screening method is chosen, factors such as the level of participation and the cost-effectiveness of protocols for adenoma follow-up will have major effects on the success of screening.

Colorectal cancer screening in general practice. A survey of current practice and attitudes in Victoria.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the views and practices of Victorian general practitioners (GPs) on the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A 1995/1996 quantitative mail survey was used to determine GP knowledge and practice in relation to CRC screening and diagnosis in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. This includes the amount of investigation, the type and process of diagnostic testing and attitudes to CRC screening. RESULTS: GPs are investigating symptomatic patients but few asymptomatic patients. In general, only patients in the increased risk groups are being investigated. Colonoscopy is the most common method of examination. Most GPs prefer faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) to be interpreted via laboratory and endoscope procedures to be performed by a specialist. CONCLUSION: GPs were unlikely to screen asymptomatic patients unless there is a family or personal history of CRC or adenomatous polyps. Colonoscopy is the preferred practice for examining such patients. The use of FOBTs for screening standard risk asymptomatic patients was lower than recent research recommends. If population screening for CRC is endorsed, professional and public education in CRC tests, particularly for asymptomatic standard risk patients would be required. Patient initiated screening was highly favoured, supporting the need for public awareness programs.

Interference of plant peroxidases with guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests is avoidable.

Peroxidase-rich fruits and vegetables are reputed to interfere with guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests. We added horseradish peroxidase to fecal samples and tested them with Hemoccult, Hemoccult SENSA(R), and hydrated Hemoccult. Positivity rates with Hemoccult and Hemoccult SENSA decreased rapidly as the time between smearing (preparation) and development increased, whereas they remained high with hydrated Hemoccult. For samples with added blood, positivity rates did not decrease with time. When 61 volunteers were tested on a standard restriction and on a challenge diet high in plant peroxidase, no positive results occurred during standard restriction. During the challenge diet, one volunteer was positive with Hemoccult and Hemoccult SENSA when development was delayed 24 h, and no volunteers were positive when it was delayed 48 h and 72 h. However, with hydrated Hemoccult, positives occurred in 13 of 61 volunteers at 24 h, 8 of 61 at 48 h, and 5 of 61 at 72 h. Thus, peroxidase-rich plant foods do not need to be excluded from the diet with Hemoccult and Hemoccult SENSA if development is delayed for at least 48 h after smearing. A delay of this duration will not solve the problem of plant peroxidase interference with hydrated Hemoccult.

Characteristics of small bowel carcinoma in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. International Collaborative Group on HNPCC.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel carcinoma is uncommon. However, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) patients are at increased risk of small bowel carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to characterize small bowel tumors in HNPCC patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to the members of International Collaborative Group on HNPCC (ICG-HNPCC) requesting clinicopathologic data in their registries on HNPCC patients with small bowel carcinoma. Survival was estimated utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Forty-two individuals from 40 HNPCC families developed 42 primary and 7 metachronous small bowel tumors. There were 46 adenocarcinomas and 3 carcinoid tumors. The median age at diagnosis of the index small bowel tumor was 49 years. Mismatch repair gene mutations were present in 15 of 42 patients (36%). There were nine hMLH1 and six hMSH2 mutations. The small bowel was the first site of carcinoma in 24 patients (57%). The median survival for the 42 patients was 47 months (range, 0-447 months). The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 44% and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Small bowel tumors can be the presenting neoplasms in HNPCC patients. Similar to colorectal carcinoma in HNPCC, small bowel adenocarcinomas in HNPCC patients occur at an earlier age and appear to have a better prognosis than those occurring in the general population.

A study of laboratory based faecal occult blood testing in Melbourne, Australia. The Faecal Occult Blood Testing Study Group.

Faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) are widely used in clinical practice and are under increasing scrutiny as a tool for colorectal cancer screening. However, there is little information regarding the quality of testing performed in pathology laboratories. Therefore, we asked 13 pathology laboratories in Melbourne, Australia, to test coded contrived faecal samples prepared from a composite stool specimen which had been spiked to various concentrations of haemoglobin. The samples were provided to the laboratories in two forms: (i) on/in the sample collection device appropriate for the faecal occult blood test they normally used; and (ii) as a moist faecal sample. Some variation in threshold analytical sensitivity between laboratories for the same FOBT was observed for Hemoccult SENSA, ColoRectal, Hematest, MonoHaem and Hemolex suggesting that, at least for those tests, technician training could be improved. Two tests, Hematest and an in-house FOBT did not perform as well as the other FOBT. When samples were sent in moist form, Hemoccult SENSA (P = 0.0002), ColoRectal (P = 0.02) and MonoHaem (P = 0.04) had significantly lower overall positivity rates; for Hemolex the decrease was not significant (P = 0.3). The lower positivity rate with moist samples is important, given that 11 of the 13 laboratories in the study stated that they receive at least some samples in moist form. Thus, technician training and laboratory procedure need to be reviewed to maximize the benefits of faecal occult blood testing in clinical practice, especially with its expanding role in colorectal cancer screening.

RNA-based mutation screening in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a cancer syndrome inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Four susceptibility genes are known, which code for DNA mismatch repair enzymes. The purpose of this study was to identify the HNPCC gene defects in a cohort of Australian HNPCC families and to evaluate the use of RNA-based screening methods. Six mutations were identified, four in the hMLH1 gene and two in hMSH2, by using a combination of DNA-based and RNA-based methods. One of the hMLH1 defects was a missense mutation, and the other five mutations would be expected to result in a shortened protein. These included a rare type of mRNA splicing mutation in hMLH1 exon 17. By use of reverse-transcriptase (RT) PCR, defective transcripts were detectable for three of the hMLH1 mutations but not for the fourth one, which was predicted to cause skipping of exon 15. Furthermore, many more alternative transcripts for the hMLH1 gene were found than previously described, and these were more abundant in the RNA samples prepared from whole blood than from lymphoblastoid cell lines. This confounded RNA-based screening for HNPCC mutations, because it was difficult to determine which aberrant RT-PCR fragment was the real hereditary defect. One of the splice-site mutations reported here causes skipping of exons 9 and 10, which also occurs as an alternative transcript. When the protein-truncation test was used, the results were indistinguishable between the patients in this family and controls. Other aberrant transcripts were also observed that varied in size between individuals but were unrelated to the hereditary defects. This study has important implications for the design of reliable diagnostic tests for HNPCC gene defects.

Prevention of colorectal cancer: guidelines based on new data. WHO Collaborating Center for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Recently published good quality data are the basis for this update. The newly reported studies include randomized trials, non-randomized cohort studies, and case-control studies; some of the data had mortality reduction as the endpoint. These guidelines, which were developed by the WHO Collaborating Center for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in conjunction with an International Advisory Committee, include primary prevention, screening of average-risk individuals, screening of individuals with heritable factors for colorectal cancer, surveillance of patients with colorectal polyps, and surveillance of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. A list of papers reviewed for this update are cited, including recently published trials evaluating faecal occult-blood testing, case-control studies of sigmoidoscopy, the National Polyp study, and familial colon cancer studies. These guidelines will help inform patients and guide physicians in their approach to the prevention of colorectal cancer.