ABSTRACT
Objective During the COVID-19 pandemic, certain precautionary measures were implemented to limit its effect, including the cancellation of clinics and elective surgical lists. To determine the impact, if any, of the pandemic on the running of a neurosurgical service, an audit was performed on the volume of referrals, admissions and type of surgeries performed at a tertiary institute in a low-resource setting. Methods An audit of the neurosurgical department's database was performed on the number of referrals, admissions, surgical procedures, and types of procedures done at the San Fernando General Hospital. This was divided into two 15-month periods, pre-pandemic (January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020) and intra-pandemic (April 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021). Results During the pre-pandemic period (January 1, 2019 - March 31, 2020), 2,597 patients were referred to the service and 309 major procedures were performed. Two thousand and forty-two patients were referred during the intra-pandemic (April 4, 2020 - June 30, 2021) period, with 354 surgeries performed. More external ventricular drains (29 vs 50), craniotomies for trauma (73 vs 98), anterior cervical fusion (42 vs 47), lumbar fusions (9 vs 12), ventriculo-peritoneal shunts (16 vs 19) and aneurysm clipping (10 vs 13) were done during the intra-pandemic period. Conclusion Although elective surgical procedures and clinics were reduced, the number of patients seen and total procedures performed did not vary significantly. The neurosurgical pathology encountered remained constant during the pandemic. This shows the importance of maintaining a fully functional neurosurgical service, as we continue to adapt to the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a treatable neurological disorder that appears in older adults, lacks specific diagnostic criteria, and resembles symptoms seen in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Presently, differentiating NPH from AD in the early stages of symptom presentation remains difficult. This study established whether olfactory testing may be useful in this regard. In addition, we determined whether olfactory function of NPH patients differed before and after extended lumbar drainage (ELD), as well as six months after surgical implantation of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two NPH patients (mean age=77.6yrs), 14 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (mean age=79.9yrs), and 7 AD patients (mean age=75.5yrs) were administered the 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). Eighteen of the 22 NPH patients were also tested following ELD and 8 patients were tested six months following implantation of VP shunt. RESULTS: Prior to ELD, patients with NPH scored significantly higher on the UPSIT than those with AD [respective means (SDs)=26.9 (7.1) & 14.1 (4.7)]. While the mean NPH score was significantly below that of the matched controls [control mean (SD)=32.7 (6.7)], their test scores were nonetheless within the general normal range, as determined from published normative data (48th percentile). The UPSIT scores did not differ significantly among the three longitudinal time points in the NPH patients. CONCLUSION: Olfactory testing may be useful in differentiating between patients with NPH and patients with AD. Odor identification test scores of NPH patients are not influenced by the release of intracranial pressure via ELD or six months following implantation of a VP shunt.