Completeness and accuracy of digital charting vs paper charting in simulated pediatric cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if data collected through digital charting are more complete and more accurate compared to traditional paper-based charting during simulated pediatric cardiac arrest. METHODS: We performed a single-center simulation-based randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to a novel handheld digital charting device (intervention group) or to the standard resuscitation paper chart (control group). Participants documented two 15-min simulated pediatric cardiac arrest scenarios. We compared the charting completeness between the two groups. Completeness score (primary outcome) was established by calculating a completeness score for each group based on a list of pre-determined critical tasks. Charting accuracy (secondary outcome) was compared between the two groups, defined as the time interval between the real-time task performance and charted time. RESULTS: Charting data from 34 simulated cardiac arrest events were included in the analysis (n = 18 intervention; n = 16 control). The paper charting group had a higher completeness score (median (IQR) paper vs digital: 72.0% (66.4-76.9%) vs 65.0% (58.5-66.4%), p = 0.015). For accuracy, the digital charting group was superior to the paper charting group for all pre-established critical tasks. CONCLUSION: Compared to paper-based charting, digital charting group captured more critical tasks during pediatric simulated resuscitation and was more accurate in the time intervals between real-time tasks performance and charted time. For tasks charted, paper-based charting was significantly more complete and more detailed during simulated pediatric cardiac arrest.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Déterminer si les données recueillies au moyen de la cartographie numérique sont plus complètes et plus précises que celles recueillies sur papier lors d'un arrêt cardiaque pédiatrique simulé. MéTHODES: Nous avons réalisé un essai contrôlé randomisé basé sur une simulation à centre unique. Les participants ont été affectés par randomisation à un nouvel appareil de cartographie numérique portatif (groupe d'intervention) ou au tableau papier standard de réanimation (groupe témoin). Les participants ont documenté deux scénarios simulés d'arrêt cardiaque pédiatrique de 15 min. Nous avons comparé l'exhaustivité des dossiers entre les deux groupes. Le score d'exhaustivité (résultat principal) a été établi en calculant un score d'exhaustivité pour chaque groupe en fonction d'une liste de tâches critiques prédéterminées. La précision des graphiques (résultat secondaire) a été comparée entre les deux groupes, définie comme l'intervalle de temps entre la performance de la tâche en temps réel et le temps représenté sur la carte. RéSULTATS: Les données cartographiques de 34 arrêts cardiaques simulés ont été incluses dans l'analyse (n = 18 interventions; n = 16 contrôles). Le groupe de la cartographie papier avait un score d'exhaustivité plus élevé (papier médian (IQR) que numérique: 72,0% (66,4­76,9%) contre 65,0% (58,5­66,4%), p = 0,015). Pour des raisons de précision, le groupe de cartographie numérique était supérieur au groupe de cartographie papier pour toutes les tâches critiques préétablies. CONCLUSION: Par rapport à la cartographie sur papier, le groupe de cartographie numérique a capturé des tâches plus critiques lors de la réanimation pédiatrique simulée et était plus précis dans les intervalles de temps entre les performances des tâches en temps réel et le temps cartographié. Pour les tâches cartographiées, les dossiers papier étaient significativement plus complets et plus détaillés lors de l'arrêt cardiaque pédiatrique simulé.

Is Ophthalmia Neonatorum Associated With Invasive Bacterial Infection? A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Ophthalmia neonatorum (ON) is a conjunctivitis occurring in neonates and can be caused by multiple bacterial pathogens. The risk of invasive bacterial infection (IBI) in neonates with ON is poorly known. Our objectives were to document the association of ON with IBI in term neonates and to investigate practice variation. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of all neonates who presented to a single emergency department (ED) between January 2018 and December 2019. Participants were all children with a final diagnosis of ON according to the treating physician as registered in the ED computerized database. Newborns with craniofacial malformations and premature infants were excluded. The primary outcome was IBI as defined by growth of any bacterial pathogen in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Perinatal risk factors, ED visit details (symptoms on presentation, management, and treatment plan) as well as complications (ocular morbidity, death, and unscheduled return visits) were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-two term neonates were included. There were no cases of IBI associated with ON (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-6.9%). Six ocular bacterial infections were identified, one of which was Chlamydia trachomatis . Although there were no IBIs, ocular complications, deaths, or unscheduled return visits to the ED, there was a wide variation in physician's management of ON. Physicians ordered investigations in 49% (95% CI, 34%-62%) of neonates, prescribed antibiotics to 87% (95% CI, 74%-94%), and involved specialists in 39% (95% CI, 27%-52%) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department presentations of term neonates with ON are associated with a low risk of IBI. A better understanding of the current practice variation is needed to inform clinical guidelines for the management of neonates with ON presenting to the ED.

Data-informed debriefing for cardiopulmonary arrest: A randomized controlled trial.

Aim: To determine if data-informed debriefing, compared to a traditional debriefing, improves the process of care provided by healthcare teams during a simulated pediatric cardiac arrest. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized trial. Participants were randomized to a traditional debriefing or a data-informed debriefing supported by a debriefing tool. Participant teams managed a 10-minute cardiac arrest simulation case, followed by a debriefing (i.e. traditional or data-informed), and then a second cardiac arrest case. The primary outcome was the percentage of overall excellent CPR. The secondary outcomes were compliance with AHA guidelines for depth and rate, chest compression (CC) fraction, peri-shock pause duration, and time to critical interventions. Results: A total of 21 teams (84 participants) were enrolled, with data from 20 teams (80 participants) analyzed. The data-informed debriefing group was significantly better in percentage of overall excellent CPR (control vs intervention: 53.8% vs 78.7%; MD 24.9%, 95%CI: 5.4 to 44.4%, p = 0.02), guideline-compliant depth (control vs. intervention: 60.4% vs 85.8%, MD 25.4%, 95%CI: 5.5 to 45.3%, p = 0.02), CC fraction (control vs intervention: 88.6% vs 92.6, MD 4.0%, 95%CI: 0.5 to 7.4%, p = 0.03), and peri-shock pause duration (control vs intervention: 5.8 s vs 3.7 s, MD -2.1 s, 95%CI: -3.5 to -0.8 s, p = 0.004) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in time to critical interventions between groups. Conclusion: When compared with traditional debriefing, data-informed debriefing improves CPR quality and reduces pauses in CPR during simulated cardiac arrest, with no improvement in time to critical interventions.

Decreased pregnancy and live birth rates after vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes.

PURPOSE: To assess effects on fertilization rate, embryo quality, pregnancy, and live birth rates of vitrification and warming of oocytes that matured in vitro (vIVM) compared to fresh in vitro maturation (fIVM) cycles. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital-affiliated IVF unit. Fifty-six cycles of vIVM cycles and 263 fIVM in women diagnosed with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) ovaries were included in the analysis. The study group included PCOS patients who failed ovulation induction with intrauterine insemination and were offered IVM cycle followed by oocyte vitrification and warming. The embryological aspects and clinical outcomes were compared to those of controls undergoing fresh IVM cycles during the same period. The main outcome measure was live birth rate. RESULTS: One thousand seventy oocytes were collected from 56 patients and underwent vitrification and warming. In the control group, 4781 oocytes were collected from 219 patients who had undergone a fresh IVM cycle. Oocyte maturation rates were similar between the groups (mean ± SD: 0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2, for vIVM and fIVM, respectively). Survival rate after warming was 59.8%. Fertilization and embryo cleavage rates per oocyte were significantly lower in the vIVM group. Clinical pregnancy (10.7 vs. 36.1%) and live birth rates (8.9 vs. 25.9%) per cycle were significantly lower in the vIVM group than those in the fIVM group (P = 0.005 and P < 0.001, respectively). Five healthy babies were born in the vIVM group. CONCLUSIONS: The reproductive potential of vitrified IVM oocytes is impaired. This injury likely occurs through vitrification and warming.