GILT--A randomised phase III study of oral vinorelbine and cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy followed by either consolidation therapy with oral vinorelbine and cisplatin or best supportive care alone in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered standard for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Consolidation chemotherapy (CC) following CRT is intended to further improve outcomes, yet studies have shown discordant results. This phase III study assessed CRT followed by best supportive care (BSC) or consolidation with oral vinorelbine and cisplatin. METHODS: Patients received two cycles of oral vinorelbine (50 mg/m(2) days 1, 8 and 15) + cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) days 1-4) q4w + radiotherapy (RT; 66 Gy). Patients with at least stable disease (SD) were randomised to either two cycles oral vinorelbine (60-80 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) + cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) day 1) q3w + BSC or BSC alone. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 279 patients were enrolled for CRT and 201 patients were randomised to CC or BSC. Both CRT and CC were well tolerated, with limited radiation-mediated grade 3/4 toxicities (CRT/CC/BSC: oesophagitis-related events 12.9 %/3.1 %/0 %; grade 3 pneumonitis 0 %/0 %/2 %) and chemotherapy-mediated grade 3/4 toxicities (CRT/CC: neutropenia 11.2 %/22.1 %; leukopenia 18.3 %/26.7 %; grade 3 nausea 5.0 %/2.3 %, grade 3 vomiting 3.2 %/3.5 %). Median PFS from randomisation was 6.4 (5.0-8.7) and 5.5 (3.8-7.4) months in the CC and BSC arms (hazard ratio, HR = 0.93 [0.69-1.26]; p = 0.63), respectively; median overall survival (OS) 20.8 (13.5-25.3) and 18.5 (13.6-24.7) months, respectively. DISCUSSION: Consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent CRT did not prolong PFS or OS. Concurrent RT with oral vinorelbine and cisplatin demonstrated a favourable safety profile and represents a suitable treatment regimen for inoperable stage III NSCLC.

Relapse analysis of irradiated patients within the HD15 trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

PURPOSE: To determine, in the setting of advanced-stage of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), whether relapses occur in the irradiated planning target volume and whether the definition of local radiation therapy (RT) used by the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) is adequate, because there is no harmonization of field and volume definitions among the large cooperative groups in the treatment of advanced-stage HL. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients with residual disease of ≥ 2.5 cm after multiagent chemotherapy (CTX) were evaluated using additional positron emission tomography (PET), and those with a PET-positive result were irradiated with 30 Gy to the site of residual disease. We re-evaluated all sites of disease before and after CTX, as well as the PET-positive residual tumor that was treated in all relapsed patients. Documentation of radiation therapy (RT), treatment planning procedures, and portal images were carefully analyzed and compared with the centrally recommended RT prescription. The irradiated sites were compared with sites of relapse using follow-up computed tomography scans. RESULTS: A total of 2126 patients were enrolled, and 225 patients (11%) received RT. Radiation therapy documents of 152 irradiated patients (68%) were analyzed, with 28 irradiated patients (11%) relapsing subsequently. Eleven patients (39%) had an in-field relapse, 7 patients (25%) relapsed outside the irradiated volume, and an additional 10 patients (36%) showed mixed in- and out-field relapses. Of 123 patients, 20 (16%) with adequately performed RT relapsed, compared with 7 of 29 patients (24%) with inadequate RT. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency and pattern of relapses suggest that local RT to PET-positive residual disease is sufficient for patients in advanced-stage HL. Insufficient safety margins of local RT may contribute to in-field relapses.

Randomized study of postoperative radiotherapy and simultaneous temozolomide without adjuvant chemotherapy for glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous postoperative temozolomide radiochemotherapy in glioblastoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2002 to July 2004, n = 65 patients from 11 German centers with macroscopic complete tumor resection were randomized to receive either postoperative radiotherapy alone (RT, n = 35) or postoperative radiotherapy with simultaneous temozolomide (RT + TMZ, n = 30). Patients were stratified according to age (< or =/>50 years) and WHO performance score (0-1 vs. 2). RT consisted of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In the RT + TMZ arm, oral TMZ was administered daily at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) including weekends (40-42 doses). Adjuvant treatment was not given, but in both arms, patients with recurrent tumors and in good condition (WHO 0-2) were scheduled for salvage chemotherapy with TMZ. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early due to the results of EORTC-study 26981-22981 that showed a survival benefit for the combination of concomitant and adjuvant TMZ compared to radiotherapy alone. In total, 62/65 patients were evaluable. Stratification variables were well balanced (< or = 50 years 26% vs. 20%, WHO 0-1 91% vs. 100%). Neither overall survival (median 17 vs. 15 months) nor progression-free survival (median 7 vs. 6 months) differed significantly between the two arms. In the RT (RT + TMZ) arm, 76% (62%) of the progressing patients received salvage chemotherapy with TMZ, 36% (50%) had a second resection. There was a time-constant trend for increased general quality of life (EORTC questionnaire QLQ C30) and brain-specific quality of life (EORTC questionnaire B20) in the combined arm. Lymphopenia G3-4 was more frequent (33 vs. 6%) in the RT + TMZ arm. CONCLUSION: After early closure of this trial, a benefit for progression-free survival for simultaneous TMZ radiochemotherapy alone could not be demonstrated. In both arms, salvage therapies were frequently used and probably had a major effect on overall survival.

Involved-node radiotherapy in early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. Definition and guidelines of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy of Hodgkin's Lymphoma has evolved from extended-field to involved-field (IF) radiotherapy reducing toxicity whilst maintaining high cure rates. Recent publications recommend further reduction in the radiation field to involved-node (IN) radiotherapy; however, this concept has never been tested in a randomized trial. The German Hodgkin Study Group aims to compare it with standard IF radiotherapy in their future HD17 trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ALL patients must be examined by the radiation oncologist before the start of chemotherapy. At that time, patients must have complete staging CT scans. For patients with IN radiotherapy, a radiation planning CT before and after chemotherapy with patients in the treatment position is recommended. Fusion techniques, allowing the overlapping of the pre- and postchemotherapy CT scans, should be used. Usage of PET-CT scans with patients in the treatment position is recommended, whenever possible. RESULTS: The clinical target volume encompasses the initial volume of the Lymph node(s) before chemotherapy and incorporates the initial Location and extent of the disease taking the displacement of the normal tissues into account. The margin of the planning target volume should be 2 cm in axial and 3 cm in craniocaudal direction. If necessary, it can be reduced to 1-1.5 cm. To minimize Lung and cardiac toxicity, the target definition in the mediastinum is different. CONCLUSION: The concept of IN radiotherapy has been proposed as a means to further improve the therapeutic ratio by reducing the risk of radiation-induced toxicity, including second malignancies. Field sizes wiLL further decrease compared to IF radiotherapy.

Long-term results of a prospective multicenter phase II study to preserve the larynx function using concomitant boost radiochemotherapy with Carboplatin.

PURPOSE: This prospective phase II study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of a larynx preservation protocol with simultaneous radiochemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 3/1998 and 10/2000, 42 patients with moderately advanced cancer of the larynx (n=25) and hypopharynx (n=17) eligible for total laryngectomy (LE) were treated in a prospective larynx preservation study. The study protocol scheduled 66Gy in 5 weeks using a concomitant boost technique and 70mg/m(2) Carboplatin on days 1-5 in weeks 1 and 5. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the censored study patients was 41 months (9-95 months). The 5-year overall survival was 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.84), the 5-year laryngectomy-free survival 0.60 (95% CI 0.42-0.78), and the laryngeal preservation rate at 5 years 0.67 (95% CI 0.49-0.85). Cox multivariate regression analysis showed the total tumor volume to be the only statistically significant factor on locoregional failure-free survival. Six of 23 tumor-free long-term survivors received a tracheotomy because of late laryngeal toxicity associated with dysphagia 30-79 months after radiochemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the late laryngeal toxicity observed the value of this regimen for larynx preservation is limited.

Quality control of involved field radiotherapy in patients with early-favorable (HD10) and early-unfavorable (HD11) Hodgkin's lymphoma: an analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

PURPOSE: The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) set up a radiotherapy (RT) reference center within the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Cologne to undertake quality assurance of the group's clinical studies. In the HD10 trial (early-favorable stages) and HD11 trial (early-unfavorable stages) all patients received involved field (IF)-RT (30 Gy vs. 20 Gy) within a combined-modality approach. For these patients a central prospective review of all diagnostic imaging was performed by expert radiation oncologists to control disease extension and to define IF treatment volume. METHODS AND MATERIALS: On the basis of simulation films, verification films, and radiotherapy case report form (CRF) an expert panel evaluated retrospectively the adequacy of irradiated IF treatment portals according to the RT prescription, applied radiation doses, treatment time, and technical parameters. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2006 a total of 825 of 1370 randomized patients of the HD10 trial (60%) and 954 of 1422 patients of the HD11 trial (67%) were evaluated by the panel. Radiotherapy was rated as suboptimal in 47% of all reviewed cases. Although the participating RT centers received a precise RT prescription, most difficulties occurred in the adequate coverage of the IF (40%), followed by technical faults (12%). Deviations from the prescribed single daily dose (1.8-2 Gy), weekly dose, and total reference dose were rare (1%). CONCLUSIONS: As a consequence of these findings, radiation oncologists were trained on the definition of IF-RT at GHSG meetings and at the annual meetings of the German Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology. Possible correlations between RT quality and relapse rate will be investigated.

A Contribution to solve the problem of the need for consolidative radiotherapy after intensive chemotherapy in advanced stages of Hodgkin's lymphoma--analysis of a quality control program initiated by the radiotherapy reference center of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).

PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy (RT) after intensive chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is still unclear. The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) randomized HD12 trial was designed to test whether consolidative RT in the region of initial bulky disease and of residual disease is necessary after effective chemotherapy. A quality control program based on a multidisciplinary panel of radiation oncologists, radiologists, and medical oncologists who reviewed all patients' staging and restaging imaging was initiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 1661 patients aged 16 to 65 years with HL in Stage IIB (large mediastinal mass and/or E-lesions) or Stage III to IV were randomized from January 1999 to January 2003 according to a factorial design between: 8 esc.BEACOPP + RT (arm A), 8 esc.BEACOPP non-RT (arm B), 4+4BEACOPP + RT (arm C), 4+4BEACOPP non-RT (arm D). RESULTS: In the fifth interim analysis, 1449 patients were eligible for the arm comparison with regard to RT. After a median observation time of 48 months the FFTF rate was 86% and the OS 92%. The FFTF was 95% in the RT arms A+C and 88% in the non-RT arms B+D: no sequential significant difference. One thousand and eighty four patients were evaluated by the panel. The panel defined initial bulky disease in 800 patients and residual disease in 600 patients. The panel recommended continuation of therapy according to the randomization for 934 of 1084 patients and additive RT independently from the randomization arm for 145 of 1084 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that RT can be reduced substantially after effective chemotherapy. However, because of the irradiation of 10% of patients in the non-RT arms, equivalent effectiveness of a non-RT strategy cannot be proved. A substantial limitation of consolidative RT according to expert panel recommendations appears to be possible without reducing effectiveness.

Efficacy of intensified hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil: updated results of a randomized multicentric trial in advanced head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To prove an expected benefit of concurrent radiochemotherapy (RCT), a two-arm randomized multicentric study was performed. In a subgroup analysis the influence of pretherapeutical hemoglobin level (p-Hb) on survival under locoregional control (SLC) was tested. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included primarily untreated Stage III/IV (International Union Against Cancer [UICC]) oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Patients were randomized to receive either hyperfractionated (hf) and accelerated (acc) RCT with two cycles 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2)/day) and carboplatin (70 mg/m(2)/day) on Days 1-5 and 29-33 or hf-acc radiotherapy (RT) alone. Total RT dose in both arms was 69.9 Gy in 38 days in concomitant boost technique. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 57 months, SLC is significantly better in RCT than in RT (p = 0.01), with median SLC of 17 months and 11 months, respectively. Also overall survival (OS) shows a benefit for RCT (p = 0.016), with a median survival of 23 months for RCT and 16 months for RT. However, the benefit in SLC and OS is not seen in hypopharyngeal carcinomas. In a multivariate analysis of oropharyngeal cancer patients, p-Hb levels lower than 12.7 g/dL resulted in lower SLC compared with higher p-Hb levels up to 13.8 g/dL. P-Hb levels >13.8 g/dL did not further improve SLC. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperfractionated-accelerated RCT is superior to hf-acc RT in oropharyngeal carcinomas. P-Hb levels >13.8 g/dL do not further improve SLC.

The HD12 panel of the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG): a quality assurance program based on a multidisciplinary panel reviewing all patients' imaging.

The purpose of this report is to determine the value of a central specialist radiologic review and to determine the image quality of computed tomography (CT) in Hodgkin disease. The HD12 protocol is a multicenter prospective randomized trial of the GHSG for advanced stages of Hodgkin disease. The indication and effectiveness of additional radiotherapy (30 Gy), in the area of initial bulky disease and of residual disease, following intensive chemotherapy using the BEACOPP schema (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone), is to be investigated. A multidisciplinary panel of radiation oncologists, radiologists, and medical oncologists reviews, blinded to treatment arms, the diagnostic imaging with comparison to the documentation forms. For patients with poor response to chemotherapy, the panel recommends radiotherapy independent of the randomization. This procedure guarantees that patients with a poor response to chemotherapy receive additional radiotherapy. Furthermore, the panel evaluates the quality of CT examinations in this multicenter study. Since July 1999, a total of 2607 CT of 371 patients have been evaluated. Helical CT showed significantly higher contrast enhancement and imaging quality than conventional CT (P < 0.001). CT from university hospitals was assessed as superior to that from other institutions (P < 0.001). Compared with the written disease documentation by the study centers, the panel assessed different extensions of disease in 814 of 2607 CT (31%), resulting in a change of stage in 17 of 371 patients (5%). After chemotherapy, 167 of 371 patients (45%) showed residual disease (>1.5 cm), and for 53 of 371 patients (14%) the panel recommended additional radiotherapy independent of the randomization arm. Patients with Hodgkin disease receive high-quality CT imaging. A central independent multidisciplinary panel markedly improves quality assurance for these study patients.

Centralized radiation oncologic review of cross-sectional imaging of Hodgkin's disease leads to significant changes in required involved field-results of a quality assurance program of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

PURPOSE: To guarantee the treatment quality of involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) of patients in the Hodgkin's disease (HD)10 and HD11 trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group, with 460 participating study centers, a quality assurance program was conducted. It was based on a central prospective radiation oncologic review of all patients' entire diagnostic imaging and clinical findings. An individual RT prescription was provided for every study patient. The purpose of the present investigation was to assess the feasibility of such a procedure and its impact on the final definition of disease extension and patient treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2002, 1371 patients were enrolled into the HD10 trial (early-stage disease) and 1570 patients into the HD11 trial (intermediate-stage disease). The HD10 trial tested four cycles of Adriamycin (doxorubicin), bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) against two cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy of IF-RT vs. 30 Gy of IF-RT (four study arms). The HD11 trial compared four cycles of ABVD with four cycles of BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) baseline followed by 20 Gy IF-RT vs. 30 Gy IF-RT in a four-arm design. All study centers were required to score disease involvement at a total of 34 possible anatomic sites on case report forms and send them, together with all diagnostic imaging, to the RT reference center in Cologne, Germany. Images were reviewed there by a panel of expert radiation oncologists and radiologists and compared with the case report form. Differences between the disease involvement documented by the participating center and the reference center were recorded. Subsequently, an individualized treatment proposal was compiled. Complete sets of documentation were submitted to the reference center for 89% of the patients in both HD10 and HD11. RESULTS: A considerable proportion of involved sites were incorrectly recorded on the corresponding case report form by the participating center. For patients with early-stage HD (HD10), there was a correction of disease involvement in 49% (593 of 1214 patients) and for patients with intermediate-stage HD (HD11) in 67% (936 of 1397 patients). Most discrepancies were seen in the lower mediastinum (23%), infraclavicular (17%), upper cervical (16%), supraclavicular (13%), and pulmonary hilar region (13%). This resulted in a change of disease stage in 41 of those 1,529 patients whose documented disease involvement had to be corrected (2.7%). Ninety-three patients had to be treated in a different protocol, because of changes in stage and risk factors. Owing to incorrect lymph node documentation of the participating centers, the RT treatment volume had to be enlarged in 891 (34%) and reduced in 82 (3%) of 2,611 patients. CONCLUSION: A central prospective review of patient data and consecutive prescription of individual RT treatment volume is feasible within large multicenter trials for HD. Such a procedure has a significant impact on the correctness of stage definition, allocation to treatment groups, and extent of the IF treatment volume.

Multimodality therapy including radiotherapy and chemotherapy improves event-free survival in stage C esthesioneuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of multimodality therapy in patients with esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 01/1979 through 08/2001, 47 patients with ENB (20 men, 27 women, age 5-81 years), were registered from 18 oncologic centers. There were 14 tumors stage B and 33 stage C according to the Kadish classification. Initial treatment included surgery alone in seven patients, radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy (CTX) in twelve, surgery plus postoperative RT in 15, and multimodality therapy (surgery plus pre- or postoperative CTX plus postoperative RT) in 13. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 64 +/- 8% and the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) 50 +/- 8%. Patients with multimodality treatment had a significantly better 5-year EFS (74 +/- 13%) compared to the other patients (41 +/- 9%; p = 0.05), while the 5-year OS was not significantly different between the treatment groups (p = 0.39). For patients with Kadish stage C, multimodality therapy (n = 11) resulted in superior 5-year EFS (72 +/- 14% vs 17 +/- 9%; p = 0.01). These patients tended to have an improved OS (69 +/- 15% vs 47 +/- 12%; p = 0.19) compared to the other treatment groups. None of the patients with multimodality treatment had a metastatic relapse. CONCLUSION: Multimodality treatment (surgery plus pre- or postoperative CTX plus postoperative RT) appears to be highly efficient in preventing local and systemic relapse in patients with advanced ENB. Timing and optimal agents of CTX need to be further evaluated.

Role of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of Merkel cell carcinoma.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin with a high potential of locoregional relapse after surgery alone. This report is an update of our experience in the treatment of MCC. From January 1990 to May 2000, 31 patients with MCC, 13 men and 18 women aged between 34 and 92 years, were treated at the University of Cologne, Germany. Primary tumor sites were in the head and neck region in 13 patients, limbs in 13, and trunk in 5. The tumors were stage I in 26 of 31 patients, stage II in 4 of 31 and stage III in 1 of 31. Treatment included surgery alone in 14 of 31 patients, adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy in 16 of 31 patients, 1 of them had incomplete surgery, and definitive radiotherapy in 1 of 31 patients (stage III). Median overall survival (OS) after first diagnosis was 32 months (95% confidence interval: 0-75 months) with a 3-year OS rate of 47% (95% CI: 25-69%). Six of 31 patients relapsed locally after a median of 4 months, 10 of 31 patients developed regional node metastases, and 7 of 31 patients distant metastases. Nine patients died as a direct result of MCC. Locoregional control and disease-free survival were significantly improved in the group with postoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.023). Uni- and multivariate analysis revealed that head and neck location of the tumor and the lack of postoperative radiotherapy are unfavorable prognostic factors. Postoperative radiotherapy to the primary tumor region and the regional lymphatics is effective in the prevention of locoregional recurrence. Prospective clinical trials should be performed to confirm these observations.