Amenorrhea after weight recover in anorexia nervosa: role of body composition and endocrine abnormalities.

UNLABELLED: Hypothalamic amenorrhea in anorexia nervosa often precedes weight loss and may persist after re-feeding and restoration of a stable normal weight. AIM: To assess the rate of persistent amenorrhea in anorexia nervosa (AN) after re-feeding and the relations of this condition with body composition changes and other endocrine parameters. METHODS: A cohort of 250 female outpatients was studied to assess persistent amenorrhea prevalence after stable weight recovery. Among these, we selected 20 AN female patients (age 16.5-35), 10 with amenorrhea (group 1) and 10 with normal menses (group 2). We collected data such as age, age at menarche, age at onset of AN, actual body mass index (BMI) and at onset of AN, duration of disease. Physical activity has been evaluated as minute per day. The following data were obtained: prolactin, growth hormone, estradiol, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, free triiodothyronine, free thyroxine, free urinary cortisol, serum calcium and phosphates, urinary calcium, phosphaturia and alkaline phosphatase. Body composition was assessed with a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (14%) over a cohort of 250 where still amenorrhoic after stable weight recovery. No significance was found in the evaluation of blood biochemical tests of the 2 groups. Free urinary cortisol was significantly higher in amenorrhoic patients (58.14+/-0.4 vs 15.91+/-9.5), p=0.02. The analysis of body composition has shown a percentage of fat of 22.23+/-5.32% in group 1 and of 26.03%+/-9.1% in group 2, respectively, showing no significant differences. Amenorrhoic patients carried on doing a significantly heavier physical activity than eumenorrhoic patients. CONCLUSIONS: An adequate body composition and a well represented fat mass are certainly a necessary but not sufficient condition for the return of the menstrual cycle. Such menstrual cycle recovery would probably need other conditions at present being studied and evaluated to occur, such as secretory patterns of leptin and its correlations with adrenal function.

Densitometric evaluation in women with anorexia nervosa.

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is classified as a high-risk factor for osteoporotic fractures. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most popular method for measuring bone loss, but it is less sensitive than quantitative computed tomography (QCT). We compared DXA and QCT in measuring the lumbar spine of 17 female patients with AN and 27 healthy subjects. We found discordance between DXA and QCT using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria with the T-score. With QCT as a reference method because of its sensitivity, we found one false-negative, one false-positive, and two misdiagnosed cases. We suggest some correction factors to improve DXA evaluation and screening of bone loss in AN.

Osteoporosis and anorexia nervosa: relative role of endocrine alterations and malnutrition.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric disorder characterised by self-induced starvation or a very reduced caloric intake, and frequently by severe life-threatening protein calory malnutrition. Its physiological consequences include amenorrhea, estrogen deficiency and osteoporosis. Osteoporosis may develop as a consequence of a lack of estrogens, low calcium or vitamin D intake, hypercortisolemia or the duration of the illness. The aim of this study was to identify the best endocrinological and nutritional indicators of bone density. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study involved 49 young females with AN and malnutrition and 24 age-matched normal controls in whom AN had been excluded on the basis of a clinical evaluation using DSM IV criteria. We studied bone density in early osteopenia, a condition in which the potential risk of fractures is certainly high and traditionally related to a variety of endocrinological and nutritional factors. RESULTS: Bone density was significantly lower in the AN than the control group in all of the examined bone districts: bone mineral density (BMD) spine 0.89 +/- 0.19 vs 1.27 +/- 0.2 (p<0.0001), BMD neck 0.75 +/- 0.14 vs 1.08 +/- 0.17 (p<0.001), BMD Ward 0.74 +/- 0.17 vs 1.12 +/- 0.11 (p<0.0001). Non-significant differences were found in the patients who had undergone previous estrogen medication. Body mass index (BMI) correlated with bone density, but caloric and calcium intake were not significant predictors. IGF-1, a known nutritionally dependent trophic bone factor, was significantly reduced in our patients but did not correlate with BMD. Like other authors, we found a close correlation between lean body mass and BMD in neck and spine. Physical exercise, urinary free cortisol osteocalcin and type I collagen-telopeptide (NTX) did not significantly correlate with the degree of osteopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the importance of nutritional factors (particularly lean body mass and BMI) in determining bone mass, and the relatively limited importance of endocrinological factors with the exception of the duration of amenorrhea as an indirect indicator of endocrinological status.