Cardiac PET Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification Assessment of Early Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) has demonstrated utility for diagnostic and prognostic assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) but has not been evaluated in the first year after transplant. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate CAV at 1 year by PET myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification. METHODS: Adults at 2 institutions enrolled between January 2018 and March 2021 underwent prospective 3-month (baseline) and 12-month (follow-up) post-transplant PET, endomyocardial biopsy, and intravascular ultrasound examination. Epicardial CAV was assessed by intravascular ultrasound percent intimal volume (PIV) and microvascular CAV by endomyocardial biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 136 PET studies from 74 patients were analyzed. At 12 months, median PIV increased 5.6% (95% CI: 3.6%-7.1%) with no change in microvascular CAV incidence (baseline: 31% vs follow-up: 38%; P = 0.406) and persistent microvascular disease in 13% of patients. Median capillary density increased 30 capillaries/mm2 (95% CI: -6 to 79 capillaries/mm2). PET myocardial flow reserve (2.5 ± 0.7 vs 2.9 ± 0.8; P = 0.001) and stress MBF (2.7 ± 0.6 vs 2.9 ± 0.6; P = 0.008) increased, and coronary vascular resistance (CVR) (49 ± 13 vs 47 ± 11; P = 0.214) was unchanged. At 12 months, PET and PIV had modest correlation (stress MBF: r = -0.35; CVR: r = 0.33), with lower stress MBF and higher CVR across increasing PIV tertiles (all P < 0.05). Receiver-operating characteristic curves for CAV defined by upper-tertile PIV showed areas under the curve of 0.74 for stress MBF and 0.73 for CVR. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year post-transplant PET MBF is associated with epicardial CAV, supporting potential use for early noninvasive CAV assessment. (Early Post Transplant Cardiac Allograft Vasculopahty [ECAV]; NCT03217786).

Fibrotic Plaque and Microvascular Dysfunction Predict Early Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Progression After Heart Transplantation: The Early Post Transplant Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Study.

BACKGROUND: Early cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) prognostication is needed to improve long-term outcomes after heart transplantation. We characterized first year posttransplant coronary anatomic-physiologic alterations to determine predictors of early CAV progression. METHODS: Heart transplant recipients at 2 institutions (enrolled January 2018 to March 2021) underwent prospective evaluation 3 and 12-month posttransplant with angiography and left anterior descending artery intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance measurements. CAV progression was assessed by intravascular ultrasound change in percentage intimal volume from baseline to 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (mean age, 51 years; 60% men) completed evaluation at mean 13.8 and 56.3 weeks posttransplant. Donor atherosclerosis (baseline intravascular ultrasound maximal intimal thickness, ≥0.5 mm) was evident in 50%. De novo (follow-up maximal intimal thickness, ≥0.5 mm) and rapidly progressive CAV (maximal intimal thickness, ≥0.5-mm increase from baseline) developed in 24% and 13%, respectively. On optical coherence tomography, baseline to follow-up median intimal volume increased 42% (0.58 mm3/mm), percentage intimal volume increased 44% (4.6%), vessel volume decreased 4% (-0.50 mm3/mm) and lumen volume decreased 9% (-1.02 mm3/mm); P<0.05 for all. Fibrotic plaque was the predominant morphology: baseline, 29% and follow-up, 50%. Coronary physiology was abnormal in 41% at baseline and 45% at follow-up, with 1 in 5 patients having microvascular dysfunction (index of microcirculatory resistance, ≥25). On multivariable linear regression analysis, recipient male sex, fibrotic plaque, and index of microcirculatory resistance were independent predictors of coronary disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrotic plaque on optical coherence tomography and index of microcirculatory resistance early posttransplant predict CAV progression in the first year of transplantation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03217786.

Natural History of Mitral Annular Calcification and Calcific Mitral Valve Disease.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of mitral annular calcification (MAC) and risk for developing calcific mitral valve disease (CMVD) have been poorly defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the progression rate of MAC and of the development of CMVD. METHODS: Patients with MAC and paired echocardiograms ≥1 year apart between 2005 and 2019 were included. Progression rates from mild or moderate to severe MAC and to CMVD (defined as severe MAC and significant mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation) were assessed, along with potential association with sex. RESULTS: A total of 11,605 patients (mean age, 73 ± 10 years; 51% men) with MAC (78% mild, 17% moderate, 5% severe) were included and underwent follow-up echocardiography at 4.2 ± 2.7 years. Among patients with mild or moderate MAC, 33% presented with severe MAC at 10 years. The rate of severe MAC was higher in women than in men (41% vs 24% [P < .001]; hazard ratio, 1.3; P < .001) and in patients with moderate versus mild MAC (71% vs 22% [P < .001]; hazard ratio, 6.1; P < .001). At 10 years, 10% presented with CMVD (4%, 23%, and 60% in patients with mild, moderate, and severe MAC, respectively), which was predicted by female sex (15% vs 5%; P < .0001), even after adjustment for MAC severity (hazard ratio, 1.9; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with MAC, progression to severe MAC was common and frequently resulted in CMVD. Female sex was associated with higher progression rates. MAC and CMVD are expected to dramatically increase as the population ages, highlighting the importance of a better understanding of the pathophysiology of MAC to develop effective preventive medical therapies.

Prognostic utility of longitudinal quantification of PET myocardial blood flow early post heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification by Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promise for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) surveillance and risk stratification post heart transplantation. The objective was to determine the prognostic value of serial PET performed early post transplantation. METHODS AND RESULT: Heart transplant (HT) recipients at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute with 2 PET examinations (PET1 = baseline, PET2 = follow-up) within 6 years of transplant were included in the study. Evaluation of PET flow quantification included stress MBF, coronary vascular resistance (CVR), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). The primary composite outcome was all-cause death, re-transplant, myocardial infarction, revascularization, allograft dysfunction, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), or heart failure hospitalization. A total of 121 patients were evaluated (79% male, mean age 56 ± 11 years) with consecutive scans performed at mean 1.4 ± 0.7 and 2.6 ± 1.0 years post HT for PET1 and PET2, respectively. Over a mean follow-up of 3.0 (IQR 1.8, 4.6) years, 26 (22%) patients developed the primary outcome: 1 death, 11 new or progressive angiographic CAV, 2 percutaneous coronary interventions, 12 allograft dysfunction. Unadjusted Cox analysis showed a significant reduction in event-free survival in patients with PET1 stress MBF < 2.1 (HR: 2.43, 95% CI 1.11-5.29 P = 0.047) and persistent abnormal PET1 to PET2 CVR > 76 (HR: 2.19, 95% CI 0.87-5.51 P = 0.045). There was no association between MFR and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Low-stress MBF and persistent increased CVR on serial PET imaging early post HT are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Early post-transplant and longitudinal assessment by PET may identify at-risk patients for increased surveillance post HT.

Validation of multiparametric rubidium-82 PET myocardial blood flow quantification for cardiac allograft vasculopathy surveillance.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy of Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification for CAV. The purpose of this study was to validate multiparametric PET detection of CAV by combined rate-pressure-product-corrected myocardial flow reserve (cMFR), stress MBF, and coronary vascular resistance (CVR) assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Diagnostic CAV cut-offs of cMFR < 2.9, stress MBF < 2.3, CVR > 55 determined in a previous study (derivation) were assessed in heart transplant recipients referred for coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (validation). CAV was defined as International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation CAV1-3 on angiography; and maximal intimal thickness ≥ 0.5 mm on IVUS. Eighty patients (derivation n = 40, validation n = 40) were included: 80% male, mean age 54±14 years, 4.5±5.6 years post transplant. The prevalence of CAV was 44% on angiography and 78% on IVUS. Combined PET cMFR < 2.9, stress MBF < 2.3, CVR > 55 CAV assessment yielded high 88% (specificity 75%) and 83% (specificity 40%) sensitivity for ≥ 1 abnormal parameter and high 88% (sensitivity 59%) and 90% (sensitivity 43%) specificity for 3 abnormal parameters, in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: We validate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric PET flow quantification by cMFR, stress MBF, and CVR for CAV.

Multidisciplinary Code Shock Team in Cardiogenic Shock: A Canadian Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality. We report on a "Shock Team" approach of combined interdisciplinary expertise for decision making, expedited assessment, and treatment. METHODS: We reviewed 100 patients admitted in CS over 52 months. Patients managed under a Code Shock Team protocol (n = 64, treatment) from 2016 to 2019 were compared with standard care (n = 36, control) from 2015 to 2016. The cohort was predominantly male (78% treatment, 67% control) with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR], 43-64) for treatment vs 64 years (IQR, 48-69) for control (P = 0.01). New heart failure was more common in the treatment group: 61% vs 36%, P = 0.02. Acute myocardial infarction comprised 13% of patients in CS. There were no significant differences between treatment and control in markers of clinical acuity, including median left ventricular ejection fraction (18% vs 20%), prevalence of moderate-severe right ventricular dysfunction (64% vs 56%), median peak serum lactate (5.3 vs 4.7 mmol/L), acute kidney injury (70% vs 75%), or acute liver injury (50% vs 31%). Inotropes, dialysis, and invasive ventilation were required in 92%, 33%, and 66% of patients, respectively. Temporary mechanical circulatory support was used in 45% of treatment and 28% of control patients (P = 0.08). There were no significant differences in median hospital length of stay (17.5 days), 30-day survival (71%), or survival to hospital discharge (66%). Over 240 days (IQR, 14,847) of median follow-up, survival was 67% for treatment vs 42% for control (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.99; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary Code Shock Team approach for CS is feasible and may be associated with improved long-term survival.

CONTEXTE: Le choc cardiogénique (CC) est associé à une mortalité élevée. Nous décrivons une approche où la prise de décision, l'évaluation rapide des cas et le traitement sont confiés à une « équipe de choc ¼ interdisciplinaire. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons examiné les cas de 100 patients hospitalisés en raison d'un CC sur une période de 52 mois. Les patients pris en charge par une équipe interdisciplinaire selon un protocole d'intervention déclenché par un code-choc (n = 64, groupe traité) de 2016 à 2019 ont été comparés à des patients ayant reçu des soins courants (n = 36, groupe témoin) de 2015 à 2016. Les patients de la cohorte étaient majoritairement de sexe masculin (78 % dans le groupe traité, 67 % dans le groupe témoin) et l'âge médian était de 55 ans (intervalle interquartile [IIQ] : 43-64) au sein du groupe traité par rapport à 64 ans (IIQ : 48-69) au sein du groupe témoin (p = 0,01). Les nouveaux cas d'insuffisance cardiaque étaient plus fréquents dans le groupe traité : 61 % vs 36 % (p = 0,02). Les patients hospitalisés en raison d'un CC avaient subi un infarctus aigu du myocarde dans 13 % des cas. Aucune différence significative n'a été relevée entre le groupe traité et le groupe témoin au chapitre des marqueurs d'acuité clinique, y compris la fraction médiane d'éjection ventriculaire gauche (18 % vs 20 %), la prévalence d'une dysfonction modérée ou sévère du ventricule droit (64 % vs 56 %), la concentration maximale médiane de lactate sérique (5,3 vs 4,7 mmol/l), l'insuffisance rénale aiguë (70 % vs 75 %) ou l'insuffisance hépatique aiguë (50 % vs 31 %). L'administration d'inotropes, la dialyse et la ventilation effractive ont été nécessaires chez 92 %, 33 % et 66 % des patients, respectivement. Une assistance circulatoire mécanique temporaire a été utilisée chez 45 % des patients du groupe traité et 28 % des patients du groupe témoin (p = 0,08). Aucune différence significative n'a été notée en ce qui concerne la durée médiane des hospitalisations (17,5 jours), la survie à 30 jours (71 %) ou la survie à la sortie de l'hôpital (66 %). Au cours d'une période de suivi médiane de 240 jours (IIQ : 14 847), le taux de survie était de 67 % dans le groupe traité vs 42 % dans le groupe témoin (rapport des risques instantanés : 0,53; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 0,28-0,99; p = 0,03). CONCLUSION: Dans les cas de CC, l'intervention d'une équipe interdisciplinaire déclenchée par un code-choc est réalisable et pourrait être associée à une amélioration de la survie à long terme.

Biomarker discovery in cardiac allograft vasculopathy using targeted aptamer proteomics.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) limits long-term survival after heart transplantation. Non-invasive evaluation is challenging, and currently, there is no validated biomarker for CAV diagnosis or prognostication. To identify potential candidate CAV biomarkers, we utilized the Slow Off-rate Modified Aptamer (SOMAscan) assay, which evaluates over 1000 serum proteins, including many relevant to biological pathways in CAV. We evaluated three heart transplant patient groups according to angiographic ISHLT CAV grade: CAV1-2 (mild-moderate CAV), CAV3 (severe CAV), and CAV0 (normal control). SOMAscan assays were performed and proteins quantitated. Comparisons of proteins between study groups were performed using one-way ANOVA (false discovery rate q-value < 0.10). Thirty-one patients (12 mild-moderate CAV, 9 severe CAV, 10 controls) were included: 81% male, median age 57 years and median 1.1 years post-transplant. Compared to controls, patients with mild-moderate CAV had similar characteristics, while patients with severe CAV had longer time from transplant and increased allosensitization. Statistical/bioinformatics analysis identified 14 novel biomarkers for CAV, including 4 specific for mild-moderate CAV. These proteins demonstrated important actions including apoptosis, inflammation, and platelet/coagulation activation. Upon preliminary receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, our protein biomarkers showed moderate-to-high discriminative ability for CAV (area under curve: 0.72 to 0.94). These candidate biomarkers are being validated in prospective studies.

Does Cardiac Physical Exam Teaching Using a Cardiac Simulator Improve Medical Students' Diagnostic Skills?

Background Challenges in bedside teaching may be overcome by the use of high-fidelity simulators for teaching the cardiac physical exam. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of first-year medical students (MS1) to perform a cardiac physical exam and make the correct diagnosis after instruction using standardized patients (SPs) as compared to a cardiac simulator (Harvey, Laerdal Medical Corporation, NY, US). Methods Thirty-two MS1 were randomized to a teaching module on either SPs or Harvey. Their performance and ability to make the correct diagnosis were evaluated during a posttest objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) on real patients. Results No difference in the mean OSCE score was observed (SP: M=62.2% vs. Harvey: M=57.2%, p=0.32). The SP group obtained a higher frequency of correct diagnoses (M=61.5% SP vs. M=21.0% Harvey, p=0.03). Student feedback revealed that Harvey offered superior clinical findings; however, 34.4% of students requested a combination of teaching modalities as opposed to either method alone. Conclusions Performance in examination skills did not differ between the SP and Harvey groups but the SP group demonstrated an improved ability to arrive at a unifying diagnosis. A combined teaching program may be ideal for transferability to patients.

Impact of organ prioritization for immunologic sensitization and waiting times for heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The Canadian status 4S category prioritizes highly sensitized patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) > 80% awaiting heart transplantation. We examined the effect of sensitization and status 4S and developed a predictive model to estimate waiting time in Canada. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients listed for heart transplant at the Ottawa Heart Institute and Toronto General Hospital (Ontario, Canada). We evaluated the association of CPRA and priority listing status on waiting time and post-transplant outcomes. Waiting time risk factor analysis was performed using a multivariable parametric accelerated failure time model with a Weibull distribution. RESULTS: Of 394 patients listed (75% male, 51 ± 12 years), 291 (74%) received a transplant and 33 (8%) died waiting. The cumulative incidence of transplant decreased across higher CPRA groups but was similar for moderately and highly sensitized groups: 67%, 70%, 50%, and 40% at 12 months for CPRA 0%, 1% to 50%, 51% to 80%, and > 80%, respectively (p = 0.020). Status 4S patients experienced longer waiting times compared with other high priority status 3.5 and 4 and had increased risk of death on the waiting list (p = 0.014). Over a median follow-up of 2.4 years (interquartile range, 1.2-4.1), rejection occurred in 64 sensitized patients (24%) compared with 24 non-sensitized patients (9%; p = 0.019), but there was no difference in survival, allograft dysfunction, or cardiac allograft vasculopathy. A model predicting transplant waiting time, including CPRA, blood group, priority listing status, age, and weight, was developed and showed adequate discrimination and calibration. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting time to heart transplant is increased for highly and moderately sensitized patients, suggesting the need to reevaluate the CPRA > 80% threshold for status 4S prioritization in Canada. Extended waiting times, despite 4S prioritization, supports consideration of additional factors to CPRA in ensuring equitable organ access for sensitized patients.

Myocardial viability: from PARR-2 to IMAGE HF - current evidence and future directions / Viabilidade miocárdica: de PARR-2 a IMAGE HF - evidências atuais e futuras direções

Ischemic heart failure is a growing disease with high morbidity and mortality. Several studies suggest the benefit of viability imaging to assist revascularization decision, but there is controversy. Multiple imaging modalities can be used to accurately define hibernating myocardium; however, the best approach remains uncertain. This review will highlight current evidence and future directions of viability imaging assessment

Diffuse Subepicardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement After Heart Transplant: A Potentially Ominous Finding.

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has prognostic utility in populations with cardiac disease, including heart transplant (HT) recipients. The etiology of specific LGE patterns and their correlation with outcomes after HT are unclear. Antibody-mediated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy are major causes of death, and their evaluation remains challenging. We report identical diffuse subepicardial LGE in 2 highly allosensitized HT recipients who developed allograft failure. We postulate this LGE pattern may be related to antibody-mediated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and portends poor outcomes. These cases illustrate a potential role of cardiac magnetic resonance for antibody-mediated rejection evaluation and risk stratification.

Optimizing Risk Stratification and Noninvasive Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is an important and previously underappreciated cause of significant morbidity and mortality in women. Key differences exist in the pathophysiology, sex-specific risk factors, and clinical presentation in women compared with men, which influence diagnostic accuracy and utility of pretest risk assessments and noninvasive testing. Women are disproportionately affected by ischemia from microvascular dysfunction as evidenced by having less obstructive coronary artery disease on angiography, contributing to the challenge in diagnosis and prognosis of IHD in women via conventional methods, which tend to emphasize detection of epicardial stenoses. In this article, we review the utility, evidence for, and challenges of currently available risk assessments and noninvasive cardiac diagnostic tests in women. We propose an approach to investigation of the symptomatic woman with suspected IHD and selection of the appropriate testing modality. Finally, we explore opportunities for future research and highlight the urgent need for updated, evidence-based, Canadian guidelines specific to women with IHD.

PET Assessment of Epicardial Intimal Disease and Microvascular Dysfunction in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of graft failure and death after heart transplantation. Absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification using rubidium 82 (Rb-82) positron emission tomography (PET) could enable evaluation of diagnostically challenging diffuse epicardial and microvascular disease in CAV. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to evaluate Rb-82 PET detection of CAV. METHODS: Consecutive transplant recipients undergoing coronary angiography were prospectively evaluated with PET, multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and intracoronary hemodynamics. CAV was defined as International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation CAV1-3 on angiography and maximal intimal thickness ≥0.5 mm on IVUS. RESULTS: Forty patients (mean age 56 years, 4.8 years post-transplant) completed evaluation. CAV was detected in 32 patients (80%) by IVUS and 14 (35%) by angiography. PET correlated significantly with invasive coronary flow indices: r = 0.29, rate-pressure product-adjusted myocardial flow reserve (cMFR) versus coronary flow reserve; r = 0.28, relative flow reserve versus fractional flow reserve; and r = 0.37, coronary vascular resistance (CVR) versus index of microcirculatory resistance. Patients with CAV or microvascular dysfunction had reduced cMFR and stress MBF and increased CVR. Receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated good accuracy of PET for CAV on IVUS (area under the curve 0.77 to 0.81) and optimal diagnostic cutoffs of cMFR <2.9, stress MBF <2.3, and CVR >55. Combined PET assessment for CAV yielded excellent >93% sensitivity (>65% specificity) for 1 abnormal parameter and >96% specificity (>55% sensitivity) for 2 abnormal parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Rb-82 PET flow quantification has high diagnostic accuracy for CAV, with potential for noninvasive evaluation after heart transplantation.

Profound Vasoplegia During Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment After Heart Transplantation.

Vasoplegia occurs in up to 16% of patients who undergo heart transplantation (HT) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We present a case of a 61-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy receiving sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto; Novartis, Cambridge, MA) who developed profound hypotension after HT. He was treated with intravenous methylene blue and high-dose vasopressors, but developed acute kidney injury requiring dialysis and a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. This case supports a potent vasodilatory effect of sacubitril/valsartan, and if confirmed by other studies, might warrant consideration for withholding treatment while awaiting HT, particularly in patients with risk factors for vasoplegia.

Ejection fraction improvement and reverse remodeling achieved with Sacubitril/Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients.

BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/Valsartan has been shown to improve mortality and reduce hospitalizations in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on ejection fraction (EF) and reverse remodeling parameters have not been previously described. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of HFrEF patients (n=48) who were treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan for a median duration of 3 months (Interquartile range 2-6 months). Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were reviewed at three time points (pre-baseline which was median of 18 months before starting Sacubitril/Valsartan, baseline before treatment started, and post-Sacubitril/Valsartan). Paired sample t-test and one-way repeated measures ANOVA were used for normally distributed data, while Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for non-normally distributed data. RESULTS: Sacubitril/Valsartan use was associated with an average 5% (±1.2) increase in EF, from a mean baseline of 25.33% to 30.14% (p<0.001) with a median duration of treatment 3 months. There was no significant change in mean LVEF over a median duration of 11 months (IQR 5.5-15.5) between pre-baseline and baseline time points prior to treatment (p=1.0). The mean increase in ejection fraction tended to be marginally greater in the medium/high dose cohort as compared to the low dose cohort, with a mean increase of 5.09% (±1.36) and 4.03% (±3.17), respectively (p=0.184). There was a 3.36 mm reduction in left ventricular end-systolic diameter (p=0.04), a 2.64 mm reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (p=0.02), and a 14.4 g/m2 reduction in left ventricular mass index (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Sacubitril/Valsartan was found to improve EF and multiple measures of reverse remodeling beyond the effects of concomitant optimal medical therapy. Though these results are encouraging, our small sample, observational study requires confirmation in larger cohorts with longer follow-up periods.

Reduced Myocardial Flow in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: There remains limited insight into the pathophysiology and therapeutic advances directed at improving prognosis for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recent studies have suggested a role for coronary microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF. Rb-82 cardiac positron emission tomography imaging is a noninvasive, quantitative approach to measuring myocardial flow reserve (MFR), a surrogate marker for coronary vascular health. The aim of this study was to determine whether abnormalities exist in MFR in patients with HFpEF without epicardial coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 376 patients with ejection fraction ≥50%, no known history of obstructive coronary artery disease, and a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure (n=78) were compared with patients with no evidence of heart failure (n=298), further stratified into those with (n=186) and without (n=112) hypertension. Global and regional left ventricular MFR was calculated as stress/rest myocardial blood flow using Rb-82 positron emission tomography. Patients with HFpEF were more likely to be older, female, and have comorbid hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, anemia, and renal dysfunction. HFpEF was associated with a significant reduction in global MFR (2.16±0.69 in HFpEF versus 2.54±0.80 in hypertensive controls; P<0.02 and 2.89±0.70 in normotensive controls; P<0.001). A diagnosis of HFpEF was associated with 2.62 times greater unadjusted odds of having low global MFR (defined as <2.0) and remained a significant predictor of reduced global MFR after adjusting for comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: HFpEF, in the absence of known history for obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease, is associated with reduced MFR independent of other risk factors.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy.

Modern treatment strategies have led to improvements in cancer survival, however, these gains might be offset by the potential negative effect of cancer therapy on cardiovascular health. Cardiotoxicity is now recognized as a leading cause of long-term morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. This guideline, authored by a pan-Canadian expert group of health care providers and commissioned by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, is intended to guide the care of cancer patients with established cardiovascular disease or those at risk of experiencing toxicities related to cancer treatment. It includes recommendations and important management considerations with a focus on 4 main areas: identification of the high-risk population for cardiotoxicity, detection and prevention of cardiotoxicity, treatment of cardiotoxicity, and a multidisciplinary approach to cardio-oncology. All recommendations align with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Key recommendations for which the panel provides a strong level of evidence include: (1) that routine evaluation of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and optimal treatment of preexisting cardiovascular disease be performed in all patients before, during, and after receiving cancer therapy; (2) that initiation, maintenance, and/or augmentation of antihypertensive therapy be instituted per the Canadian Hypertension Educational Program guidelines for patients with preexisting hypertension or for those who experience hypertension related to cancer therapy; and (3) that investigation and management follow current Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure guidelines for cancer patients who develop clinical heart failure or an asymptomatic decline in left ventricular ejection fraction during or after cancer treatment. This guideline provides guidance to clinicians on contemporary best practices for the cardiovascular care of cancer patients.