Analysis of >15 000 Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Reveals Nonanal Genitourinary HPV-related Disease as Highest Risk Predictor for Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions/Anal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplantation is a risk predictor for virally-mediated anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and cancer (anal disease). Precancerous squamous intraepithelial lesions can be detected by screening, and treatment may prevent cancer progression. Screening recommendations are not well defined. We aim to define prevalence and describe risk predictors for anal disease in a large population of solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Retrospective single-center cohort analysis included solid organ transplant recipients cared for between 2001 and 2022 (N = 15 362). The cohort of recipients who developed anal disease was compared with those who did not. Greedy propensity score matching was performed for organ-specific recipients, and time-to-event analysis for the development of anal disease was performed in those with genitourinary human papilloma virus (HPV) disease versus those without. RESULTS: Prevalence of anal disease was 0.6% (cancer 0.2%). The average years from transplant to the diagnosis of anal disease was 11.67. Anal disease was more common in women (68.5% versus 31.5%, P  < 0.001), patients who had other HPV-related genitourinary diseases (40.4% versus 0.6%, P  < 0.001), who were of younger age at transplant (39.62 versus 46.58, P  < 0.001), and had increased years from transplant (17.06 versus 12.57, P  < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the odds of anal disease increased by 4% each year posttransplant. History of genitourinary HPV disease (odds ratio 69.63) and female sex (odds ratio 1.96) were the most significant risk predictors for anal disease. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anal cancer among solid organ transplant recipients was equal to the general population (0.2%). Due to the low prevalence of overall disease, these data suggest that anal screenings in transplant recipients should be targeted to higher-risk subsets: female recipients farther out from transplant and patients with genitourinary HPV-related diseases.

A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Anal Cancer Screenings in US Veterans Living with HIV.

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at high risk for anal cancer. Anal cancer screenings are recommended annually for US veterans with HIV. Screenings can identify treatable precursor lesions and prevent cancer development. In a previous study, we found screening rate to be only 15%. Semistructured interviews were conducted with Veterans Affairs (VA) providers who treat veterans living with HIV. Participants described their experiences with anal cancer screenings. Researchers developed a codebook based on Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and coded data using thematic analysis to identify barriers to anal cancer screenings. Twenty-three interviews were conducted with VA providers representing 10 regions. Barriers identified corresponded with five targetable TDF domains: Knowledge, Skills, Environmental Context/Resources, Professional Roles/Identities, and Social Influence. Many providers lacked knowledge of screening protocols. Knowledgeable providers often lacked needed resources, including swabs, clinic space, reliable pathology, access to high-resolution anoscopy, or leadership support to implement a screening program. Providers mentioned competing priorities in the care of veterans with HIV infection and lack of skilled/trained personnel to perform the tests. It was often unclear which provider specialty should "own" screening responsibilities. Additional factors included patient discomfort with screening exams. Anal cancer screening protocols are recommended but not widely adopted in VA. There is a critical need to address barriers to anal cancer screenings in veterans. The TDF domains identified align with five intervention domains to target, including education, training, resource/environment, delineation of provider roles, and improved counseling efforts. Targeting these barriers may help improve the uptake of anal cancer screenings within VA.

Duration of Time CD4/CD8 Ratio is Below 0.5 is Associated with Progression to Anal Cancer in Patients with HIV and High-Grade Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: A CD4/CD8 ratio < 0.5 is associated with increased risk of advanced anal disease (AAD) but it is unknown if duration below 0.5 matters. The purpose of this study was to determine if duration of a CD4/CD8 ratio < 0.5 is associated with increased risk of invasive anal cancer (IC) in people living with HIV and high-grade dysplasia (HSIL). METHODS: This single institution, retrospective study used the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Anal Dysplasia and Anal Cancer Database. Patients with IC versus HSIL alone were compared. Independent variables were mean and percentage of time the CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to estimate the adjusted odds of anal cancer. RESULTS: We identified 107 patients with HIV infection and AAD (87 with HSIL, 20 with IC). A history of smoking was significantly associated with the development of IC (95% in patients with IC vs. 64% in patients with HSIL; p = 0.015). Mean time the CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5 was significantly longer in patients with IC compared with patients with HSIL (7.7 years vs. 3.8 years; p = 0.002). Similarly, the mean percentage of time the CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5 was higher in those with IC versus those with HSIL (80% vs. 55%; p = 0.009). On multivariate analysis, duration CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5 was associated with increased odds of developing IC (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.53; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, single-institution study of a cohort of people living with HIV and HSIL, increasing duration the CD4/CD8 ratio was < 0.5 was associated with increased odds of developing IC. Monitoring the number of years the CD4/CD8 ratio is < 0.5 could inform decision making in patients with HIV infection and HSIL.

Use and Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis for Ovarian Masses in Children and Adolescents.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Describe the current practice patterns and diagnostic accuracy of frozen section (FS) pathology for children and adolescents with ovarian masses DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from 2018 to 2021 SETTING: Eleven children's hospitals PARTICIPANTS: Females age 6-21 years undergoing surgical management of an ovarian mass INTERVENTIONS: Obtaining intraoperative FS pathology MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnostic accuracy of FS pathology RESULTS: Of 691 patients who underwent surgical management of an ovarian mass, FS was performed in 27 (3.9%), of which 9 (33.3%) had a final malignant pathology. Among FS patients, 12 of 27 (44.4%) underwent ovary-sparing surgery, and 15 of 27 (55.5%) underwent oophorectomy with or without other procedures. FS results were disparate from final pathology in 7 of 27 (25.9%) cases. FS had a sensitivity of 44.4% and specificity of 94.4% for identifying malignancy, with a c-statistic of 0.69. Malignant diagnoses missed on FS included serous borderline tumor (n = 1), mucinous borderline tumor (n = 2), mucinous carcinoma (n = 1), and immature teratoma (n = 1). FS did not guide intervention in 10 of 27 (37.0%) patients: 9 with benign FS underwent oophorectomy, and 1 with malignant FS did not undergo oophorectomy. Of the 9 patients who underwent oophorectomy with benign FS, 5 (55.6%) had benign and 4 (44.4%) had malignant final pathology. CONCLUSIONS: FSs are infrequently utilized for pediatric and adolescent ovarian masses and could be inaccurate for predicting malignancy and guiding operative decision-making. We recommend continued assessment and refinement of guidance before any standardization of use of FS to assist with intraoperative decision-making for surgical resection and staging in children and adolescents with ovarian masses.

Promoting patient engagement during care transitions after surgery using mobile technology: Lessons learned from the MobiMD pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Poorly coordinated transitions of care in complex abdominal surgery patients contribute to frequent hospital readmissions and inflated healthcare spending. Mobile health (mHealth) transitional care technologies may reduce surgical readmissions yet remain understudied in high-risk surgical populations. METHODS: We conducted a single-group, prepost study of a mHealth transitional care app in 50 complex surgical patients. Eligible patients were adults undergoing complex abdominal surgery in the divisions of Surgical Oncology and Colorectal Surgery. The main outcome was app engagement, calculated by notification response rate (number of participant-entered datapoints divided by the total number of app-requested datapoints) over the 30-day postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included changes in engagement over time and by individual app feature. RESULTS: A total of 85% (50/59) of eligible patients enrolled. Most participants were male (58%, n = 29), and mean age was 50 years (range 24-80 years). Overall notification response rate was 28%. Among the 58% of participants (29/50) who engaged with the app at least once after discharge (app users), the average notification response rate was 45%. The mean notification response rate among app users decreased over time from 50% to 32% between weeks 1 and 4 after hospital discharge. Engagement with individual app features ranged from 48-81%, with highest engagement for symptom reports and lowest engagement for wound care instructions. CONCLUSION: mHealth transitional care is feasible in complex surgical patients using only patients' existing smart devices. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine the impact on hospital readmissions, surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and overall resource utilization.

Protocol for the MobiMD trial: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a self-monitoring mobile app on hospital readmissions for complex surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions are estimated to cost $17.4 billion per year in the Medicare population alone, with readmission rates as high as 30% for patients undergoing complex abdominal surgery. Improved transitional care and self-monitoring may reduce preventable readmissions for such high-risk populations. In this study, we will conduct a single-institution randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effect of a novel transitional care mobile app, MobiMD, on hospital readmission in complex abdominal surgery patients. METHODS: Three hundred patients will be randomized 1:1 to standard of care (SOC) versus SOC plus MobiMD app in a parallel, single-blinded, two-arm RCT. Eligible patients are those who undergo complex abdominal surgery in the division of Surgical Oncology, Colorectal Surgery or Transplant Surgery. The MobiMD app provides push notification reminders directly to the patient's smart device, prompting them to enter clinical data and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical data collected via the MobiMD app include vital signs, red flag symptoms, daily wound and surgical drain images, ostomy output, drain output, medication compliance, and wound care compliance. These data are reviewed daily by a physician. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes are 90-day hospital readmission, emergency department and urgent care visits, complication severity, and total readmission cost. DISCUSSION: If effective, mobile health apps such as MobiMD could be routinely integrated into surgical transitional care programs to minimize unnecessary hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and healthcare resource utilization. Clinical trials identifier: NCT04540315.

Patient preferences for GI cancer surveillance and telemedical follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Surveillance care including routine physical exams and testing following gastrointestinal (GI) cancer treatment can be fiscally and emotionally burdensome for patients. Emerging technology platforms may provide a resource-wise surveillance strategy. However, effective implementation of GI cancer surveillance is limited by a lack of patient level perspective regarding surveillance. This study aimed to describe patient attitudes toward GI cancer surveillance and which care modalities such as telemedicine and care team composition best meet the patient's needs for follow-up care. METHODS: Focused interviews were conducted with 15 GI cancer patients undergoing surveillance following curative-intent surgery. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and uploaded to NVivo. Study personnel trained in qualitative methods consensus coded 10% of data inductively and iteratively developed a codebook and code descriptions. Using all transcripts, data matrices were developed to identify themes inherent in the transcripts. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis revealed three overarching themes. First, increasing ease of access to surveillance care through telemedicine follow-up services may interfere with patients' preferred follow-up routine, which is an in-office visit. Second, specialist providers were trusted by patients to deliver surveillance care more than primary care providers (PCPs). Thirdly, patients desired improved psychosocial health support during the surveillance period. CONCLUSION: These novel patient-level qualitative data demonstrate that replacing conventional in-office GI cancer surveillance care with telemedicine is not what many patients desire. These data also demonstrate that his cohort of patients prefer to see specialists for GI cancer surveillance care rather than PCPs. Future efforts to enhance surveillance should include increased psychosocial support. Telemedicine implementation should be personalized toward specific populations who may be interested in fewer in-office surveillance visits.

Patient and provider perceptions on utilizing a mobile technology platform to improve surgical outcomes in the perioperative setting.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient engagement software is a ubiquitous and expensive commercially available tool designed to improve transitions of care. There are currently no high-quality patient and provider-level data about the usability of these products for surgical oncology patients. This study aims to better understand patient and provider attitudes and perceptions about the implementation of such technology. METHODS: Focused interviews were conducted following the demonstration of a provider-built mobile technology platform. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Data were consensus coded inductively and categorized into themes regarding patient and provider perspectives on the usability and implementation of MobiMD. RESULTS: Our interviews revealed four consistent themes: (1) patients feel there is a lack of reliable resources for patient education; (2) both patients and providers are supportive of using a mobile application; (3) providers perceive patient onboarding as an added burden on current workflows; and (4) after onboarding, providers express that such an application would optimize current workflows. CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceive a need for improved perioperative education. Providers and patients agree that a mobile technology platform would be an effective solution in addressing this need. Effective implementation of such an intervention may improve patient education and engagement, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Clinical outcomes following implementation of a management bundle for esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study evaluated compliance with a multi-institutional quality improvement management protocol for Type-C esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). METHODS: Compliance and outcomes before and after implementation of a perioperative protocol bundle for infants undergoing Type-C EA/TEF repair were compared across 11 children's hospitals from 1/2016-1/2019. Bundle components included elimination of prosthetic material between tracheal and esophageal suture lines during repair, not leaving a transanastomotic tube at the conclusion of repair (NO-TUBE), obtaining an esophagram by postoperative-day-5, and discontinuing prophylactic antibiotics 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: One-hundred seventy patients were included, 40% pre-protocol and 60% post-protocol. Bundle compliance increased 2.5-fold pre- to post-protocol from 17.6% to 44.1% (p < 0.001). After stratifying by institutional compliance with all bundle components, 43.5% of patients were treated at low-compliance centers (<20%), 43% at medium-compliance centers (20-80%), and 13.5% at high-compliance centers (>80%). Rates of esophageal leak, anastomotic stricture, and time to full feeds did not differ between pre- and post-protocol cohorts, though there was an inverse correlation between NO-TUBE compliance and stricture rate over time (ρ = -0.75, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with our multi-institutional management protocol increased 2.5-fold over the study period without compromising safety or time to feeds and does not support the use of transanastomotic tubes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment Study.

What Drives High Costs of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC: Patient, Provider or Tumor?

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is utilized for peritoneal malignancies and is associated with significant resource use. To address potentially modifiable factors contributing to excessive cost, we sought to determine predictors of high cost of care for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: An institutional CRS/HIPEC database was queried for adult patients from 2014 to 2018. Cost was defined as cost for the index hospitalization, and high-cost cases were defined as > 75th percentile for cost. Bivariate analyses for cost were performed, and all significant tumor, patient, and surgeon-specific variables were entered in a linear regression for cost. A separate linear regression was performed for length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: In total, 59 patients underwent 61 CRS/HIPEC procedures. The median direct variable cost was $20,509 (16,395-25,240). Median length of stay (LOS) was 8 (7-11.5) days and ICU stay was 1 (1-1.5) day. LOS, length of ICU stay and operative time were predictive of cost. Factors associated with increased LOS were Clavien-Dindo grade II complications and ostomy creation. Patient-related factors, including age and BMI, tumor-related factors, such as PCI and CCR, and surgeon were not predictive of cost nor LOS. DISCUSSION: Our results, the first to identify predictors of high cost of CRS/HIPEC-related care in the US, reveal cost was largely related to length and intensity of care. In turn, these drivers were influenced by complications and operative factors. Future work will focus on identifying an appropriate ERAS protocol following CRS/HIPEC and selection of those patients that may avoid routine ICU admission.

Optimization of percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis and pretreatment risk assessment of neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (PCNB) is increasingly utilized to diagnose solid tumors. The objective of this study is to determine whether PCNB is adequate for modern biologic characterization of neuroblastoma. PROCEDURE: A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed by the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative on children with neuroblastoma at 12 institutions over a 3-year period. Data collected included demographics, clinical details, biopsy technique, complications, and adequacy of biopsies for cytogenetic markers utilized by the Children's Oncology Group for risk stratification. RESULTS: A total of 243 children were identified with a diagnosis of neuroblastoma: 79 (32.5%) tumor excision at diagnosis, 94 (38.7%) open incisional biopsy (IB), and 70 (28.8%) PCNB. Compared to IB, there was no significant difference in ability to accurately obtain a primary diagnosis by PCNB (95.7% vs 98.9%, P = .314) or determine MYCN copy number (92.4% vs 97.8%, P = .111). The yield for loss of heterozygosity and tumor ploidy was lower with PCNB versus IB (56.1% vs 90.9%, P < .05; and 58.0% vs. 88.5%, P < .05). Complications did not differ between groups (2.9 % vs 3.3%, P = 1.000), though the PCNB group had fewer blood transfusions and lower opioid usage. Efficacy of PCNB was improved for loss of heterozygosity when a pediatric pathologist evaluated the fresh specimen for adequacy. CONCLUSIONS: PCNB is a less invasive alternative to open biopsy for primary diagnosis and MYCN oncogene status in patients with neuroblastoma. Our data suggest that PCNB could be optimized for complete genetic analysis by standardized protocols and real-time pathology assessment of specimen quality.

Severity of Postoperative Complications From the Perspective of the Patient.

BACKGROUND: Although provider-derived surgical complication severity grading systems exist, little is known about the patient perspective. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient-rated complication severity and determine concordance with existing grading systems. METHODS: A survey asked general surgery patients to rate the severity of 21 hypothetical postoperative events representing grades 1 to 5 complications from the Accordion Severity Grading System. Concordance with the Accordion scale was examined. Separately, descriptive ratings of 18 brief postoperative events were ranked. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients returned a mailed survey following their discharge from a general surgery service. Patients rated grade 4 complications highest. Grade 1 complications were rated similarly to grade 5 and higher than grades 2 and 3 (P ≤ .01). Patients rated one event not considered an Accordion scale complication higher than all but grade 4 complications (P < .001). The brief events also did not follow the Accordion scale, other than the grade 6 complication ranking highest. CONCLUSION: Patient-rated complication severity is discordant with provider-derived grading systems, suggesting the need to explore important differences between patient and provider perspectives.

Changing the Paradigm for Management of Pediatric Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Simple Aspiration Test Predicts Need for Operation.

PURPOSE: Chest tube (CT) management for pediatric primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is associated with long hospital stays and high recurrence rates. To streamline management, we explored simple aspiration as a test to predict need for surgery. METHODS: A multi-institution, prospective pilot study of patients with first presentation for PSP at 9 children's hospitals was performed. Aspiration was performed through a pigtail catheter, followed by 6 h observation with CT clamped. If pneumothorax recurred during observation, the aspiration test failed and subsequent management was per surgeon discretion. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were managed with simple aspiration. Aspiration was successful in 16 of 33 (48%), while 17 (52%) failed the aspiration test and required hospitalization. Twelve who failed aspiration underwent CT management, of which 10 (83%) failed CT management owing to either persistent air leak requiring VATS or subsequent PSP recurrence. Recurrence rate was significantly greater in the group that failed aspiration compared to the group that passed aspiration [10/12 (83%) vs 7/16 (44%), respectively, P=0.028]. CONCLUSION: Simple aspiration test upon presentation with PSP predicts chest tube failure with 83% positive predictive value. We recommend changing the PSP management algorithm to include an initial simple aspiration test, and if that fails, proceed directly to VATS. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective pilot study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Smoking and gastrointestinal cancer patients-is smoking cessation an attainable goal?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Negative consequences of tobacco use during cancer treatment are well-documented but more in-depth, patient-level data are needed to understand patient beliefs about continued smoking (vs cessation) during gastrointestinal (GI) cancer treatment. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 patients who were active smokers being treated for GI cancers and 5 caregivers of such patients. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and uploaded to NVivo. We consensus coded data inductively using conventional content analysis and iteratively developed our codebook. We developed data matrices to categorize the themes regarding patient perspectives on smoking as well as presumed barriers to smoking cessation during active therapy. RESULTS: Our interviews revealed three consistent themes: (a) Smoking cessation is not necessarily desired by many patients who have received a cancer diagnosis; (b) Failure in past quit attempts may lead to feelings of hopeless about future attempts, especially during cancer treatment; (c) Patients perceived little to no access to smoking cessation treatment at the time of their cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed systemic changes that promote the positive and efficacious effects of quitting smoking during cancer treatment, and that provide barrier-free access to such treatments may be helpful in promoting tobacco-free behavior during cancer treatment.

Satisfaction with surgeon care as measured by the Surgery-CAHPS survey is not related to NSQIP outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is a patient-centered outcome of particular interest. Previous work has suggested that global measures of satisfaction may not adequately evaluate surgical care, therefore the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey was developed. It remains unclear how traditional outcome measures, such as morbidity, impact patient satisfaction. Our aim was to determine whether National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-defined complications impacted satisfaction with the surgeon as measured by a surgery-specific survey, the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. METHODS: All patients undergoing a general surgical operation from June 2013-November 2013 were sent the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey after discharge. Retrospective chart review was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program variable definitions, and major complications were defined. Data were analyzed as a function of response to the overall surgeon-rating item, and those surgeons rated as the "best possible" or "topbox" were compared with those rated lower. Univariate and logistic regression were used to determine variable importance. RESULTS: A total of 529 patients responded, and 71.5% (378/529) rated the surgeon as topbox. The overall National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication rate was 14.2% (75/529), with 26.7% of those (20/75) being major complications. On univariate analysis, patients who rated their surgeon more highly were somewhat older (59 vs 54 years: P < .001), more often underwent elective surgery (81% vs 57%: P < .001), and had an increased rate of operation for malignancy (31% vs 17%). Neither the complication rate (total or major) nor the number of complications were associated with satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS: When examined on a patient level with surgery-specific measures and outcomes, the presence of complications after an operation does not appear to be associated with overall patient satisfaction with surgeon care. This finding suggests that satisfaction may be an outcome distinct from traditional measures.

Understanding how advanced practice registered nurses function as patient advocates.

Although patient advocacy experiences for registered nurses (RNs) have been researched over the past 40 years, very little is known about patient advocacy at the advanced practice registered nursing (APRN) level. The APRN role is distinct from the RN role, in that APRNs are focused on diagnosing, prescribing, and management of treatment of various medical conditions in the settings where APRNs are used. The purpose of this study was to explore the APRN's experience with patient advocacy using a phenomenology-based qualitative design. A total of seven Texas APRNs were randomly selected for participation in telephone interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed by the research team for repetitive statements and four themes emerged from the data: (a) patients with APRN advocacy is providing resources, information, and protection; (b) outcomes of patient with APRN advocacy: positive and negative; (c) patient advocacy mostly experientially learned at APRN level; and (d) increased medical knowledge increases advocacy ability. This pilot study provides important preliminary exploratory results regarding APRN advocacy and differentiates it from RN level advocacy. In addition, this study provides significant insight into APRN educational preparation for the APRN advocate role, thus serving as a foundation for improving educational approaches to advocacy.

Increasing Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing HESI Grade Allocation Percentage in a Psychiatric Nursing Course.

BACKGROUND: Scant evidence is found in the literature regarding the unit-level Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) examinations. This study aims to (a) compare student Psych HESI examination scores between cohorts after increasing grade allocation from 5% to 15%, and (b) examine student perceptions of the impact of increasing the percentage of course grade allocation. METHOD: An ex post facto research design analyzed differences in Psych HESI examination scores. HESI examination mean score differences between groups were analyzed using ANOVA. Narrative responses were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Psych HESI examination means increased from 836 in spring 2015 (5% of course grade) to 905 in fall 2015 (15% of course grade). Narrative response themes included (a) Validated Learning; (b) Compelled Participants to Study More; (c) Incongruent With Class Content and Preparation Books; and (d) Stress-Producing. CONCLUSION: HESI examination scores improved with increasing course grade percentage allocated to the HESI score. Students indicated positive and negative perceptions of the increased grade allocation. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(10):604-608.].

Patient Advocacy at the APRN Level: A Direction for the Future.

Patient advocacy is seen as a critical role for the nursing profession. Although there is an existing body of literature surrounding the registered nurse level of patient advocacy, little is known about the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) and patient advocacy. This article examines the existing patient advocacy research literature and existing APRN competencies to provide direction for further research.

Disease severity and treatment does not affect satisfaction in diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is widely reported and impacts satisfaction despite a limited understanding of the clinical and structural determinants. Patients with diverticulitis are admitted to various services, with variable disease severities. They, therefore, represent a unique group to delineate relationships between these factors and satisfaction. We examined the factors that impact hospital satisfaction in patients with diverticulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients admitted between 2009 and 2012 were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes. The primary outcome of patient satisfaction was the Press Ganey Survey overall hospitalization satisfaction question because of a high response rate. This is a precursor survey to the widely available Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Systems and Providers Survey. There was high concordance between these items. Clinical and structural variables were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they gave the topbox response for the overall hospital rating. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were identified (56% female, 63 ± 14 years, length of stay: 5 ± 5 d). Seventy-four percent patients rated the hospitalization as topbox. Forty-four percent were admitted to a surgical service, and 21% of all patients underwent an operation. When comparing the topbox to the nontopbox group, demographics and disease severity were similar. Treatment modality, admitting service, and outpatient intravenous antibiotics did not influence patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and structural variables did not impact overall hospital satisfaction for patients admitted with diverticulitis. This indicates that less-tangible aspects of in-hospital care may be the primary determinants of hospital satisfaction in this group. Efforts aimed at defining these variables are needed to improve patient satisfaction.