A lack of supersensitivity to opioid receptor agonists following chronic spinal opioid receptor antagonist administration in the rat.

1. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were chronically tested with intrathecal (i.t.) receptor selective opioid antagonists to determine if antinociceptive supersensitivity developed to selective i.t. opioid receptor agonists. 2. A subcutaneously implanted osmotic minipump was used to deliver the mu-opioid receptor antagonist CTOP (0.3 nmol) or the delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole (5.5 nmol) for 7 days. 3. Following a 24 hr washout period, rats received a single i.t. dose (ED50) of either DAMPGO (for CTOP-treated animals) or DPDPE (for naltrindole-treated animals) and the antinociceptive effects of the agents were tested on the tail-flick test. 4. Our findings revealed that chronic spinal treatment with selective opioid receptor antagonists did not induce an antinociceptive supersensitivity to selective opioid receptor agonists. 5. Perhaps this lack of supersensitivity is reflective of difficulties inherent to opioid receptor antagonists that do not possess negative intrinsic activity.

Age-related changes in the spinal antinociceptive effects of DAGO, DPDPE and beta-endorphin in the rat.

These studies were designed to investigate how the aging process alters the spinal antinociceptive efficacy of mu (mu), delta (delta) and epsilon (epsilon) opioid receptor agonists administered intrathecally (i.t.) in rats. Various doses of the mu agonist DAGO, the delta agonist DPDPE or the putative epsilon beta-endorphin were injected i.t. in young (5-6-month-old), mature (15-16-month-old) and aged (25-26-month-old) Fischer 344 rats. Antinociception was measured using the rat tail-flick analgesiometric assay. The data demonstrated a decline in spinal opioid-induced antinociception as a function of age. For instance, the i.t. dose of DPDPE or beta-endorphin needed to produce antinociception in the 25-26-month-old rats was higher than that needed to elevate tail-flick latency in the young and mature animals. We also noted that the i.t. doses of the opioid agonists needed to produce 'antinociception' in the aged cohort were within a range of spinal doses that produced motor impairment. Apparently, the aging process alters the ability of opioid receptors to mediate antinociception. Perhaps an age-related decrease in the number and/or affinity of opioid receptor sites in the rat spinal cord accounts for these observations.

Effects of aging on spinal opioid-induced antinociception.

Initial experiments were conducted to determine whether or not the aging process alters the ability of young, mature, or aged male Fischer 344 rats (5- to 6-, 15- to 16-, and 25- to 26-months-old, respectively) to respond to thermal nociceptive stimuli. Using the tail-flick analgesiometric assay, 25- to 26-month-old rats responded significantly faster to the heat source than 15- to 16-month-old animals, but no significant differences were noted between the 5- to 6-month-old and aged rats. Another series of investigations compared the effects of aging on the spinal antinociceptive properties of the mu opioid agonist [D-Ala2,N-methyl-Phe4,Gly5-ol] enkephalin (DAMPGO) and the delta agonist [D-Pen2,D-Pen5] enkephalin (DPDPE). In these studies, young, mature, and aged rats were injected intrathecally (IT) with different doses of DAMPGO or DPDPE, and opioid-induced antinociception was tested on the tail-flick test. All three age groups responded to IT DAMPGO in a dose-dependent manner but, for the most part, higher spinal doses were required to produce significant elevations in tail-flick latency in the aged cohort of rats. The spinal analgesic effects of DPDPE also declined with advanced age. The aging process apparently alters the pain-inhibitory function of mu and delta opioid receptors in the rat spinal cord.

The noradrenergic component contributing to spinal fentanyl-induced antinociception is supraspinally mediated.

1. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fitted with intrathecal (i.t.) and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) catheters. Fentanyl was injected either i.t. or i.c.v., and the antinociceptive efficacy of fentanyl was evaluated using the tail-flick analgesiometric assay. 2. Fentanyl dose-dependently elevated tail-flick latency (TFL) following i.c.v. or i.t. administration. The antinociceptive effects of fentanyl were reversed by naltrexone. 3. Experiments were also designed to evaluate the effects of serotonin and alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists on i.t. or i.c.v. fentanyl-induced elevations in TFL. 4. Phentolamine administered i.t. reversed both the spinal and supraspinal antinociceptive effects of fentanyl, whereas i.t. methysergide did not significantly alter the i.t. or i.c.v. effects of the mu agonist. 5. These data suggest that fentanyl-induced antinociception does not rely on local serotonergic neuronal activation. Due to the highly lipophilic nature of fentanyl, it is possible that the noradrenergic component contributing to spinal fentanyl-induced analgesia is supraspinally-mediated.

A single restraint stress exposure potentiates analgesia induced by intrathecally administered DAGO.

In rats, restraint exposure potentiates the magnitude and duration of analgesia following both the peripheral and intracerebroventricular administration of several opioid agonists as compared to non-stressed controls. It has been suggested that the site of action whereby restraint leads to potentiated opioid analgesia is located supraspinally. However, the possible contribution of spinal analgesic mechanisms also warrants investigation. Thus, the purpose of the present study was two-fold: (1) to determine whether a single exposure to restraint stress would result in the dose-dependent potentiation of analgesia following the intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the mu (mu)-receptor selective opioid agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin (DAGO) and (2) to quantify the degree of analgesia in restrained vs. non-restrained rats using the tail-flick and hot-plate analgesic assays. Using rats implanted with chronic i.t. cannula, dose- and time-course curves were observed following the i.t. administration of DAGO. The results demonstrate that both the duration and magnitude of analgesia was significantly potentiated in restrained rats compared to non-restrained controls. Restraint-treated rats receiving 0.15-0.6 micrograms of DAGO i.t. showed 1.3-1.5-fold potentiation of analgesia in the tail-flick assay and a 2.3-5.6-fold potentiation using the hot-plate assay. Restraint immobilization potentiated the magnitude and duration of DAGO-induced analgesia administered by the i.t. route as measured by the tail-flick and hot-plate assays. These data suggest that spinal analgesic mechanisms significantly contribute to the enhanced analgesic potency of opioids in subjects exposed to restraint stress.

Serotonin contributes to the spinal antinociceptive effects of morphine.

This study was designed to determine if morphine administered intrathecally (IT) interacts with serotonergic or noradrenergic nerve terminals in the spinal cord to produce analgesia on the spinally mediated tail-flick test. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fitted with IT catheters. One week later, animals were spinally pretreated with receptor antagonists selective for opioid, serotonin or alpha-adrenoceptors, and the ability of these agents to alter spinal morphine-induced antinociception was assessed. Morphine dose-dependently elevated tail-flick latency in a naltrexone-reversible manner. The serotonin receptor antagonists spiroxatrine (5-HT1A), pindolol (5-HT1B), ritanserin (5-HT2) and ICS 205-930 (5-HT3) attenuated the spinal analgesic effects of morphine. In contrast, the alpha 1 and alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists prazosin and yohimbine, respectively, did not alter morphine-induced elevations in tail-flick latency. These data substantiate earlier reports that spinal morphine-induced antinociception relies on an opioid receptor-mediated component in addition to a local serotonergic component. The finding that the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists did not alter the antinociceptive effects of IT morphine suggests that spinal norepinephrine does not contribute to the analgesic effects of the opiate.

The local monoaminergic dependency of spinal ketamine.

The effects of s.c. doses of naloxone, methysergide and phentolamine on ketamine-induced spinal analgesia were assessed to determine the involvement of opiate, serotonergic and noradrenergic components mediating ketamine's antinociceptive action. Ketamine administered intrathecally (i.t.) produced a significant elevation in tail-flick latency in rats. The spinal antinociceptive effects of ketamine were dose dependently reversed by methysergide (ID50 = 0.008 mg/kg s.c.), phentolamine (ID50 = 0.88 mg/kg s.c.) and naloxone (ID50 = 3.0 mg/kg s.c.). Unlike morphine, which remains analgesic and dependent on opiate interactions following bilateral lesions of the dorsolateral funiculus (DLF), ketamine analgesia was absent following DLF lesions. Thus, ketamine appears to produce an antinociceptive response which is dependent upon the neuronal activity of the descending pain-inhibitory pathways. The monoaminergic components comprising the descending pathways appear to be more prominent in the action of ketamine than they are in the spinal action of morphine. Furthermore, the spinal opioid receptors involved in ketamine's effect may be different from the mu subtype preferred by morphine.

Analgesic effects of serotonin and receptor-selective serotonin agonists in the rat spinal cord.

1. Serotonin (5-HT) and selective 5-HT receptor agonists were administered intrathecally (i.t.) in rats, and the antinociceptive efficacy of these agents was assessed on the tail-flick and hot plate tests. 2. The 5-HT receptor agonists examined in this study included the 5-HT1A agonist 8-hydroxy-N,N-dipropyl-2-aminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT), the 5-HT1B agonist m-trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP), the 5-HT2 agonist 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI) and the 5-HT3 agonist phenylbiguanide (PBG). 3. None of these agents produced significant elevations in tail-flick latency (TFL) at doses which produced elevations in hot plate latency (HPL). 4. In contrast, the i.t. dose of 5-HT which elevated TFL also produced analgesia on the hot plate test. 5. Serotonin-induced elevations in TFL were reversed by pindolol, ritanserin and ICS 205-930, suggesting that 5-HT interacts with more than one 5-HT site in the spinal cord to produce analgesia on the tail-flick test. 6. The finding that ritanserin reversed 5-HT-induced elevations in HPL suggests that the 5-HT2 site is primarily responsible for mediating the spinal antinociceptive effects of 5-HT on the hot plate test.

The antinociceptive effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in the rat.

The antinociceptive effects of MDMA and morphine were examined in rats using the tail-flick and hot-plate analgesiometric tests. MDMA, in the dose range of 1.5-6.0 mg/kg IP, produced a dose-dependent elevation in hot-plate latency, but did not elevate tail-flick latency. In contrast, morphine (2-8 mg/kg, IP) produced analgesia on both the tail-flick and hot-plate tests in a dose-dependent manner. Neither the opiate antagonist naltrexone nor the adrenoceptor antagonist phentolamine effectively attenuated MDMA-induced analgesia. Conversely, the serotonin antagonist methysergide significantly reversed the analgesic effects of MDMA on the hot-plate test. These findings suggest that the antinociceptive effects of MDMA are serotonergically mediated. Furthermore, the results verify earlier findings describing the test-specific effects of serotonin-induced pain modulation.

Spinal beta-endorphin analgesia involves an interaction with local monoaminergic systems.

beta-Endorphin administered intrathecally (i.t.) in rats produced a dose-dependent elevation in tail-flick latency. Naltrexone administered i.t. as a pretreatment reversed the spinal antinociceptive action of beta-endorphin, suggesting that the opioid interacts directly with spinal opiate receptors. Spinal administration of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist WB-4101 failed to alter the analgesic effects of the opioid, whereas the alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine completely blocked beta-endorphin-induced elevations in tail-flick latency. Thus, there is an apparent specificity for the alpha 2-adrenoceptor to mediate the spinal action of beta-endorphin. The 5-HT1 and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (spiroxatrine and ICS 205-930, respectively) also reversed the analgesic effects of the opioid, while the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ritanserin only partially blocked beta-endorphin-induced elevations in tail-flick latency. The present results suggest that beta-endorphin produces analgesia at the spinal level via an opiate receptor-mediated interaction with spinal monoaminergic nerve terminals.