Diaphragm Pacing in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A European Experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with high spinal cord injury (SCI) are unable to breathe on their own and require mechanical ventilation (MV). The long-term use of MV is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In patients with intact phrenic nerve function, patients can be partially or completely removed from MV by directly stimulating the diaphragm motor points with a diaphragm pacing system (DPS). OBJECTIVES: We describe our multicenter European experience using DPS in SCI patients who required MV. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who were evaluated for the implantation of DPS. Patients evaluated for DPS who met the prospectively defined criteria of being at least 1 year of age, and having cervical injury resulting in a complete or partial dependency on MV were included. Patients who received DPS implants were followed for up to 1 year for device usage and safety. RESULTS: Across 3 centers, 47 patients with high SCI were evaluated for DPS, and 34 were implanted. Twenty-one patients had 12 months of follow-up data with a median DPS use of 15 h/day (interquartile range 4, 24). Eight patients (38.1%) achieved complete MV weaning using DPS 24 h/day. Two DPS-related complications were surgical device revision and a wire eruption. No other major complications were associated with DPS use. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragm pacing represents an attractive alternative stand-alone treatment or adjunctive therapy compared to MV in patients with high SCI. After a period of acclimation, the patients were able to reduce the daily use of MV, and many could be completely removed from MV.

Prolonged non-invasive respiratory supports in a COVID-19 patient with severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

A pandemic caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 was declared in 2020. Severe cases were characterized by the development of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) requiring advanced respiratory support. However, intensive care units (ICU) were saturated, and many patients had to be treated out of ICU. This case describes a 75-year-old man affected by AHRF due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), hospitalized in a high-dependency unit, with PaO2/FiO2 <100 for 28 consecutive days. An experienced team with respiratory physiotherapists was in charge of the noninvasive ventilatory support (NIVS). The patient required permanent NIVS with continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive ventilation, high flow nasal oxygen and body positioning. He was weaned from NIVS after 37 days and started exercise training afterwards. The patient was discharged at home with low-flow oxygen therapy. This case represents an example of a successful treatment of AHRF with the still controversial noninvasive respiratory support in one patient with COVID-19.