The European Medicines Agency Review of Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Recurrent Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease.

Crizanlizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to P-selectin. On October 28, 2020, a conditional marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for crizanlizumab for the prevention of recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in patients with sickle cell disease aged 16 years or older. Crizanlizumab was evaluated in a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized multicenter trial comparing high-dose (5 mg/kg) crizanlizumab, low-dose (2.5 mg/kg) crizanlizumab and placebo in patients with a history of 2-10 VOCs in the previous year. Patients who were receiving concomitant hydroxycarbamide (HC) as well as those not receiving HC were included in the study. The primary endpoint of the trial was the annual rate of sickle cell-related pain crises as adjudicated by a central review committee. High-dose crizanlizumab led to a 45.3% lower median annual rate of sickle cell-related pain crises compared to placebo (P = 0.010), with no statistically significant difference for the low dose. Treatment with high-dose crizanlizumab led to similar incidences of adverse events (AEs), grade 3 AEs, and serious AEs compared to placebo. Most frequently observed AEs that occurred more often in the crizanlizumab arm compared to placebo were infusion related reactions (34.8% versus 21%), arthralgia (18.2% versus 8.1%), diarrhea (10.6% versus 3.2%), and nausea (18.2% versus 11.3%). The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU.

The European Medicines Agency Review of Luspatercept for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Transfusion-dependent Anemia Caused by Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Ring Sideroblasts or Beta-thalassemia.

Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that selectively binds to ligands belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily, resulting in erythroid maturation and differentiation. On June 25, 2020, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for luspatercept for the treatment of adult patients with transfusion-dependent anemia caused by very low-, low-, and intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with ring sideroblasts, or those with transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia (BT). Luspatercept was evaluated in 2 separate phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trials. The primary endpoints of these trials were the percentage of patients achieving transfusion independence over ≥8 weeks or longer for patients with MDS, and the percentage of patients achieving a ≥33% reduction in transfusion burden from baseline to week 13-24 for patients with BT. In the MDS trial, the percentage of responders was 37.91% versus 13.16%, P < 0.0001, for patients receiving luspatercept versus placebo, respectively. In the BT trial, the percentage of responders was 21.4% versus 4.5% (P < 0.0001) for luspatercept versus placebo, respectively. Treatment with luspatercept led to similar incidences of adverse events (AEs), but higher incidences of grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs compared to placebo. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent AEs (≥15%) in the pooled luspatercept group were headache; back pain, bone pain, and arthralgia; diarrhea; fatigue; pyrexia; and cough. The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application, which led to the regulatory approval in the EU.

Lipoprotein (a) in patients with spontaneous venous thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) has been established as a risk factor of coronary heart disease and stroke. Findings concerning the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults are contradictory. The aim of our study was to investigate, whether elevated Lp (a) levels are an independent risk factor of spontaneous symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our study was further designed to detect differences in risk profiles between thrombosis patients with and without symptomatic PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated Lp (a) in 128 patients with spontaneous symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT, group 1), 105 with spontaneous symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without DVT (PE, group 2) and 122 healthy controls. Lp (a) was measured with an immunoturbidimetric assay (Tina-quant(R), Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) on a Hitachi-Modular system. RESULTS: Lp (a) levels (mg/L) were not significantly different among groups, median levels (25th-75th percentiles) were 170 (51-386) in group 1, 140 (<20-427) in group 2 and 126 (54-331) in controls, respectively. As continuous variable, odds ratios for VTE for a 100 mg/L increase of Lp (a) were 1.1 [95% confidence interval 0.98-1.2] for group 1 versus controls and 1.1 [0.95-1.2] for group 2 versus controls. The prevalence of Lp (a) above 300 mg/L was not significantly different among patients and controls (group 1: 30%, group 2: 32% and controls: 25%, p=0.4, p=0.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion we found no association between Lp (a) and VTE regardless whether DVT occurred together with PE or not.

Family history for venous thromboembolism and the risk for recurrence.

PURPOSE: The relevance of a family history for venous thromboembolism with regard to the likelihood for recurrence is unknown. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 826 patients for an average of 36 months after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism and withdrawal of oral anticoagulation. Patients with cancer, lupus anticoagulant, or deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S were excluded. The study endpoint was objective evidence of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: Recurrence for venous thromboembolism was recorded in 23 of 190 patients (12.1%) with a family history (at least one affected first-degree family member) and in 79 of 636 patients (12.4%) without familial thrombosis (relative risk for recurrence 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.6; P=.9). At 5 years, the likelihood for recurrence was 20% among patients with a family history for venous thromboembolism and 18% among those without a family history for venous thromboembolism (P=.9). Risk determinants for venous thromboembolism including factor V Leiden, factor II G20210A, and high factor VIII were not statistically different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A family history for venous thromboembolism does not segregate patients into high- or low-risk categories and is not suitable to identify patients at increased risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Symptomatic pulmonary embolism and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: In patients with a first symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), the risk of recurrence is unknown. We therefore investigated the risk of recurrence among patients with spontaneous symptomatic PE and among those with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) without symptoms of PE. METHODS: After discontinuation of secondary thromboprophylaxis for a first venous thromboembolism (VTE), we prospectively observed 436 patients for an average of 30 months. Patients with secondary VTE, natural inhibitor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant, cancer, long-term antithrombotic therapy, vena cava filters, or pregnancy were excluded. The study outcome was objectively documented recurrent symptomatic VTE. RESULTS: Recurrent VTE was seen among 28 (17.3%) of 162 patients with symptomatic PE and among 26 (9.5%) of 274 patients with DVT without symptoms of PE. Compared with patients with DVT, the relative risk of recurrent VTE among patients with symptomatic PE was 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.7; P =.005). The relative risk was not affected by age, sex, presence of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A, hyperhomocysteinemia, or high factor VIII levels. Compared with patients with DVT without symptoms of PE, patients with symptomatic PE had an adjusted relative risk of PE at recurrence of 4.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.3; P =.03). CONCLUSION: Patients with a first symptomatic PE not only have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than those with DVT without symptoms of PE, but are also at high risk of symptomatic PE at recurrence.

The effect of beta-receptor blockade on factor VIII levels and thrombin generation in patients with venous thromboembolism.

High factor VIII (FVIII) is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The pathomechanism by which high FVIII leads to an increased risk of VTE is unknown. Physical activity and infusion of adrenalin provoke a rise in FVIII, which can be blocked by a nonselective beta-blockade. We tested the hypothesis that in patients with a VTE beta-blockade decreases FVIII and inhibits coagulation activation. 17 male patients with high FVIII (> 170 IU/dL, n = 7) or low FVIII (<150 IU/dL, n = 10) and a history of VTE received 40 mg of propranolol thrice daily for 14 days. FVIII and vasopressin levels were measured before and during propranolol intake and 28 days thereafter. At the same time points, haemostatic system activation was investigated by measuring prothrombin fragment f1.2 (f1.2) and thrombin antithrombin complexes (TAT) in venous blood and in blood emerging from a skin incision (shed blood). The mean FVIII level before propranolol was 192 IU/dL and 115 IU/dL in patients with high and low FVIII, respectively. During and 28 days after propranolol, no significant change in FVIII was seen in both groups. Changes in f1.2 and TAT were not detectable in either venous blood or in shed blood. beta-receptor blockade did not lower FVIII or inhibit haemostatic system activation in patients with VTE and persistently high FVIII. Administration of propranolol cannot be recommended as secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with high FVIII.