Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 268-272, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171722

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the composite outcome of progression to septic shock between 30 mL/kg/ideal body weight (IBW) versus 30 mL/kg/non-IBW fluid resuscitation dosing strategies in obese patients with severe sepsis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated obese patients admitted to an academic tertiary care center for the management of severe sepsis. Patients were included if they had a fluid bolus order placed using the sepsis order set between Oct 2018 and Sept 2019. The primary objective was the composite of progression to septic shock, defined as either persistent hypotension within 3 h after the conclusion of the 30 mL/kg fluid bolus administration or the initiation of vasopressor(s) within 6 h of the bolus administration. RESULTS: Of 72 included patients, 49 (68%) were resuscitated using an IBW-based and 23 (32%) using a non-IBW-based dosing strategy. There were similar rates of progression to septic shock in the IBW and non-IBW groups (18% vs. 26%; p = 0.54). Median ICU and hospital LOS in the IBW group versus non-IBW group were (0 [IQR 0] vs. 0 [IQR 0 to 4] days; p = 0.13) and (6 [IQR 3 to 10] vs. 8 [IQR 5 to 12] days; p = 0.07), respectively. In-hospital mortality rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that in obese septic patients, fluid administration using an IBW-dosing strategy did not affect the progression to septic shock.


Subject(s)
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fluid Therapy/standards , Obesity/complications , Sepsis/therapy , Aged , Female , Fluid Therapy/methods , Fluid Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/physiopathology , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/standards , Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/physiopathology
2.
Clin Transl Sci ; 11(2): 175-181, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29351371

ABSTRACT

Although thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping to guide thiopurine dosing is common in the pediatric cancer population, limited data exist on TPMT testing implementation in diverse, multidisciplinary settings. We established TPMT testing (genotype and enzyme) with clinical decision support, provider/patient education, and pharmacist consultations in a tertiary medical center and collected data over 3 years. During this time, 834 patients underwent 873 TPMT tests (147 (17%) genotype, 726 (83%) enzyme). TPMT tests were most commonly ordered for gastroenterology, rheumatology, dermatology, and hematology/oncology patients (661 of 834 patients (79.2%); 580 outpatient vs. 293 inpatient; P < 0.0001). Thirty-nine patients had both genotype and enzyme tests (n = 2 discordant results). We observed significant differences between TPMT test use and characteristics in a diverse, multispecialty environment vs. a pediatric cancer setting, which led to unique implementation needs. As pharmacogenetic implementations expand, disseminating lessons learned in diverse, real-world environments will be important to support routine adoption.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Methyltransferases/genetics , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Adult , Age Factors , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/standards , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Enzyme Assays/methods , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Genotype , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Male , Methyltransferases/metabolism , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/genetics , Patient Education as Topic , Pharmacists , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Genetic , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Precision Medicine/methods , Tertiary Care Centers
3.
Pharmacogenomics ; 18(5): 421-426, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28346068

ABSTRACT

The University of Florida (UF) Health Personalized Medicine Program launched in 2012 with CYP2C19 genotyping for clopidogrel response at UF Health Shands Hospital. We have since expanded CYP2C19 genotyping to UF Health Jacksonville and established the infrastructure at UF Health to support clinical implementation for five additional gene-drug pairs: TPMT-thiopurines, IFNL3 (IL28B)-PEG IFN-α-based regimens, CYP2D6-opioids, CYP2D6/CYP2C19-antidepressants and CYP2C19-proton pump inhibitors. We are contributing to the evidence based on outcomes with genotype-guided therapy through pragmatic studies of our clinical implementations. In addition, we have developed a broad array of educational programs for providers, trainees and students that incorporate personal genotype evaluation to enhance participant learning.


Subject(s)
Genetic Testing/methods , Health Education/methods , Pharmacogenetics/education , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Precision Medicine/methods , Universities , Florida , Genetic Testing/trends , Health Education/trends , Humans , Pharmacogenetics/trends , Precision Medicine/trends , Universities/trends
4.
Pharmacotherapy ; 34(10): 1102-12, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25220280

ABSTRACT

Pharmacists are uniquely qualified to play essential roles in the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics. However, specific responsibilities and resources needed for these roles have not been defined. We describe roles for pharmacists that emerged in the clinical implementation of genotype-guided clopidogrel therapy in the University of Florida Health Personalized Medicine Program, summarize preliminary program results, and discuss education, training, and resources needed to support such programs. Planning for University of Florida Health Personalized Medicine Program began in summer 2011 under leadership of a pharmacist, with clinical launch in June 2012 of a clopidogrel-CYP2C19 pilot project aimed at tailoring antiplatelet therapies for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stent placement. More than 1000 patients were genotyped in the pilot project in year 1. Essential pharmacist roles and responsibilities that developed and/or emerged required expertise in pharmacy informatics (development of clinical decision support in the electronic medical record), medication safety, medication-use policies and processes, development of group and individual educational strategies, literature analysis, drug information, database management, patient care in targeted areas, logistical issues in genetic testing and follow-up, research and ethical issues, and clinical precepting. In the first 2 years of the program (1 year planning and 1 year postimplementation), a total of 14 different pharmacists were directly and indirectly involved, with effort levels ranging from a few hours per month, to 25-30% effort for the director and associate director, to nearly full-time for residents. Clinical pharmacists are well positioned to implement clinical pharmacogenomics programs, with expertise in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics, informatics, and patient care. Education, training, and practice-based resources are needed to support these roles and to facilitate the development of financially sustainable pharmacist-led clinical pharmacogenomics practice models.


Subject(s)
Pharmacists/trends , Pharmacogenetics/trends , Professional Role , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/trends , Humans , Patient Care/methods , Patient Care/trends , Pharmaceutical Services/trends , Pharmacogenetics/methods
5.
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet ; 166C(1): 56-67, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24616371

ABSTRACT

Current challenges exist to widespread clinical implementation of genomic medicine and pharmacogenetics. The University of Florida (UF) Health Personalized Medicine Program (PMP) is a pharmacist-led, multidisciplinary initiative created in 2011 within the UF Clinical Translational Science Institute. Initial efforts focused on pharmacogenetics, with long-term goals to include expansion to disease-risk prediction and disease stratification. Herein we describe the processes for development of the program, the challenges that were encountered and the clinical acceptance by clinicians of the genomic medicine implementation. The initial clinical implementation of the UF PMP began in June 2012 and targeted clopidogrel use and the CYP2C19 genotype in patients undergoing left heart catheterization and percutaneous-coronary intervention (PCI). After 1 year, 1,097 patients undergoing left heart catheterization were genotyped preemptively, and 291 of those underwent subsequent PCI. Genotype results were reported to the medical record for 100% of genotyped patients. Eighty patients who underwent PCI had an actionable genotype, with drug therapy changes implemented in 56 individuals. Average turnaround time from blood draw to genotype result entry in the medical record was 3.5 business days. Seven different third party payors, including Medicare, reimbursed for the test during the first month of billing, with an 85% reimbursement rate for outpatient claims that were submitted in the first month. These data highlight multiple levels of success in clinical implementation of genomic medicine.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/methods , Drug Therapy/methods , Medical Informatics/methods , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Program Development/methods , Academic Medical Centers/trends , Electronic Health Records , Florida , Genotype , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacogenetics/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...