ABSTRACT
In the early steps of an emerging infectious disease epidemic such as Covid-19, uncertainties about the nature of the disease, its spread and impact can lead to emotional distress. In addition, the studies on confinement during an epidemic have shown a psychological impact of this measure on the feelings of anxiety and depression in the general population. METHOD: We assessed the psychological health of 550 patients followed up in outpatient psychiatry, via a pandemic-related teleconsultation during the first confinement period between March and June 2020. Patients were assessed at the beginning and at the end of the confinement on their personal situation, social relationships, professional activity, anxiety and mood. We also evaluated patients' symptomatology and their quality of life. RESULTS: Patients were well informed about Covid-19 via the media and complied with the confinement and barrier procedures. They appreciated the phone-calls and the teleconsultation follow-up. A small proportion of patients were completely socially isolated mainly at the beginning of the confinement (10%). There was no difference between the beginning and the end of the confinement in terms of depressive and anxiety symptoms or quality of life. The women were more anxious and depressed than men. Only smoking was significantly increased during this period. CONCLUSION: The expected and feared health catastrophe in psychiatry during this first phase of the pandemic in 2020 did not occur. Will the psychiatric wave appear in the "post- pandemic", the future will tell.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become a therapeutic tool in psychiatric diseases. METHODOLOGY: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of TMS in unipolar depression: the percentage of responders (>50% HDRS reduction) and remission (HDRS score < or =8, after four weeks of active TMS treatment in depressed patients free of any antidepressive agent versus placebo-TMS. RESULTS: 27 patients were randomized in two groups: rTMS (N=11) versus sham TMS (N=16). Statistical differences were detected between sham and TMS treated groups on remission (0/16 versus 4/11 p=0.032, 1/16 versus 6/11 0.028 and 1/16 versus 7/11 p=0.011 at day 14, day 21 and day 28, respectively) and on response (2/16 versus 5/11 at day 14 (NS), 2/16 versus 7/11 p=0.0115 at day 21 and 1/16 versus 7/11 (p=0.025) day 28, respectively, using the exact Fisher test). Significant differences were observed between day 1 versus day 8 (p<0.01), day 15, day 21 and day 28 (p<0.001) in TMS group and only versus day 21 (p<0.01) and day 28 (p<0.05) for the sham group. ANOVA comparison between TMS and sham groups was significant at day 14 and day 28 (p<0.05). LIMITATIONS: The few number of patients. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown an efficacy of right rTMS in free medication unipolar depression over a month. Nevertheless, number of patients included is limited and multicentric studies will be necessary to specify the antidepressive action of TMS.
Subject(s)
Cognition/radiation effects , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Prefrontal Cortex/radiation effects , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Double-Blind Method , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Atypical antipsychotics represent a new class of medication for the treatment of schizophrenia and their use is associated with a reduction of neurological side effects. This article reports the result of the systematic clinical and biological supervision of hepatic enzymes on 23 schizophrenic inpatients treated by atypical antipsychotic during 2 weeks at Days 1 (D1), 7 (D7), and 14 (D14) in a naturalistic study during 6 months. The drug administrated was limited to four medications--risperidone, amisulpride, olanzapine, and clozapine--but other psychotropic agents were prescribed. Six cases of biological cytolytic hepatitis were observed. Due to the numerous risk factors and the frequency of "routine" conditions, careful supervision of the hepatic function is needed to prevent this kind of side effect.