Comparison of Outcomes in Below-Knee Amputation Between Vascular, General, and Orthopedic Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: General surgeons (GS), orthopedic surgeons (OS), and vascular surgeons (VS) can perform below-knee amputation (BKA) operations. We compared the outcomes of BKA patients among the three specialties. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent a BKA were identified from the 2016-2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. Statistical data for orthopedic and vascular BKA cases were then compared with GS cases using logistic regression analysis. Outcomes included mortality, length of hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: There were 9619 BKA cases. VS had the highest volume of BKA with 58.9% of the cases, compared to GS at 22.9% and OS at 18.1%. 4.4% of general surgery patients had severe frailty compared to OS (3.3%) and VS (3.4%, P < 0.001). VS has the lowest rates of emergency cases (11.9% versus 16.1 for GS versus 15.8% versus OS) and the most favorable wound classification (38.3%, versus 48.7% for GS and VS). Peripheral vascular disease was notably highest in VS (34.0% versus. 20.6% for GS and 9.9% for OS, P < 0.001). Compared to GS, VS was more likely to have a prolonged length of stay (odds ratio) (OR)(1.409), 95% CI 1.265-1.570) while OS was less likely (OR 0.650, 95% CI 0.561-0.754). OS had a lower risk of complications (OR 0.781, 95% CI 0.674-0.904). Mortality was not significantly different among the three specialties. CONCLUSIONS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project retrospective analysis of BKA cases suggested that mortality was not statistically different when performed by VS, GS, and OS. There were fewer overall complications when OS performed a BKA, but this is more likely a result of operating upon a generally healthier patient population with lower incidence of preoperative comorbid conditions.

Effect of Age Alone on Outcome of Acute Surgical Conditions Among Healthy Patients (Non-smokers, Non-obese, and No Comorbid Conditions).

BACKGROUND: The impact of age alone in relation to postoperative outcomes needs to be further elucidated. This study investigated whether increasing age was associated with increased morbidity and mortality for patients with no comorbidities undergoing acute care surgery (ACS). METHODS: The 2016-2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was used to identify adult patients who underwent ACS performed on an urgent/emergent basis. Patients overweight or with pre-existing medical comorbidities were excluded. Patients were divided into age groups in decades. The association between outcomes and the different age groups, other patient characteristics, and perioperative factors was examined by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: 22,770 patients were identified, of which 73.5% were appendectomies, and 21.6% were open procedures. Increasing age correlated with higher unadjusted complication rates and mortality. Multivariate analyses revealed that compared to patients ≤ 30 years old, mortality was not different for patients 31-60 years old, but it was higher for the age groups > 61 years old. Patients aged 51-60 and from 71 and above were associated with higher risks of complications. Subset analysis on octogenarians revealed a 1.14-fold higher odds of mortality for every year of increasing age. Preoperative risk factors including open procedure, wound class, and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class were also associated with greater risks of mortality in octogenarians. CONCLUSION: Patients older than age 50 were at higher risk for postoperative complications, and mortality significantly increased for each decade past 60 years old in healthy individuals.

Complications After Inpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Effect of Surgeon Experience, Procedure Volume, and Other Surgeon-Based Characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined how factors such as gender, education, type of training (MD or DO), and experience of the treating surgeon affect patient outcomes. We investigated patient complications after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgeon characteristics. METHODS: A Medicare database was used to identify surgeon-specific data. The main outcome measure was the adjusted complication rates (ACR) for individual surgeons as reported by the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard. Surgeon gender, type of training, medical school rank, years since graduation, procedure volume, and teaching status of the primary hospital affiliation were assessed for any association with increased ACR using logistic regression analysis. We explored the associations among procedure volume, years of experience, and ACR using Spearman correlation. RESULTS: 1107 predominantly male (94.6%) surgeons were included. 94.4% were MDs and 34.5% were affiliated with teaching hospitals. Mean length of practice was 24 ± 9 years, and median surgeon procedure volume was 28 (IQR = 23, 37). Overall median ACR was 4.3%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that surgeon gender (P = .71), medical school rank, type of training (P = .68), or hospital affiliation (P = .77) did not have a significant impact on ACR. Increased surgeons' years in practice (r = -.028, P = .35) and increased surgeon procedure volume (r = -.021, P = .49) were negatively associated with increased ACR. CONCLUSION: Surgeon gender, type of training, medical school rank, or hospital affiliation had no impact on complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgeon experience and procedure volume may have clinical implications for patient outcomes. Further studies to elucidate factors associated with surgeon quality and patient outcomes are necessary.