ABSTRACT
The planning fallacy posits that humans tend to underestimate the amount of time needed to complete a project and that greater complexity results in a larger difference in that estimation. If this phenomenon is present in the orthopedic operating room, it could lead to negative impacts on patients, their families, and physicians themselves. Nine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at one institution were asked to give an estimate of their operative and total room times over the course of three months. Over 759 cases, the surgeons underestimated the total room times by 17.3% (p = 0.034) but did not underestimate their operative times (p = 0.590). The surgeons improved estimation of their operative time for all cases from 13.6 to 10.9 minutes of their actual time (p = 0.031) by comparing the absolute difference for the surgeons' first 25% to the last 25% of cases. Procedures performed at the hospital underestimated operative and total room times by 8.9% and 7.4% compared to the ambulatory center, which overestimated operative times by 6.0% and underestimated total room times by 3.8% (p < 0.001). We found that the planning fallacy does exist in certain situations within the orthopedic operating room.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To measure the biomechanical effect of the surgical capsulotomy made during a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique. HYPOTHESIS: The posterior capsule contributes to posterior tibial stability. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory experiment. METHODS: Six knee specimens were tested on a robotic testing system from 0 degrees to 120 degrees of flexion with the posterior cruciate ligament intact and resected and with a posterior capsulotomy identical to that performed during tibial inlay reconstruction (sham surgery). A longitudinal incision with medial and lateral soft tissue stripping sufficient to mount an inlay bone block and pass an Achilles tendon graft into the knee was made in the oblique popliteal ligament, muscle belly of the popliteus, and posterior capsule. The posterior tibial translation was measured under a posterior tibial load of 130 N at multiple flexion angles. RESULTS: Capsulotomy increased the posterior laxity compared with the posterior cruciate ligament-resected knee at every flexion angle. An additional 0.97 +/- 0.48 mm, 0.65 +/- 0.47 mm, 0.56 +/- 0.33 mm, 0.48 +/- 0.38 mm, and 0.94 +/- 0.60 mm of posterior laxity was recorded at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees of flexion, respectively. These values were all statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A posterior capsulotomy alone, without associated posteromedial or posterolateral disruption, produces additional posterior tibial translation in vitro compared with posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee with intact capsule. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Damage to the posterior capsule may contribute to the residual posterior laxity noted clinically after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
