Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Obes Res Clin Pract ; 17(3): 184-191, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37230812

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Αvaialble evidence regarding the effectiveness of intragastric injection of botulinum toxin in reducing anthropometric indices of subjects with obesity is conflicting. We evaluated the existing evidence and perform a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of intragastric botulinum toxin in treating obesity. METHODS: We identified published systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of intragastric injection of botulinum toxin in patients with overweight or obesity and additionally performed a systematic literature search to retrieve randomized controlled trials on this topic. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the existing studies. RESULTS: A total of four systematic reviews were included in our overview of systematic reviews and six randomized controlled trials were included in our meta-analysis. Compared to placebo, intragastric injection of botulinum toxin was ineffective in reducing body weight and body mass index after the application of the Knapp-Hartung adjustment (MD = -2.41 kg, 95%CI = -5.21 to 0.38, I2 =59% and MD = -1.43 kg/m2, 95%CI = -3.04 to 0.18, I2 =62%, respectively). Moreover, treatment with intragastric injection with botulinum toxin was not superior to placebo in decreasing waist and hip circumference. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, intragastric injection with botulinum toxin is an ineffective procedure in reducing body weight and body mass index when the Knapp-Hartung method was applied.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Humans , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Obesity/drug therapy , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Review Literature as Topic
2.
Nutrition ; 82: 111024, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33183899

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Many treatment modalities have been used to manage psoriasis; however, there is, to our knowledge, no pooled estimate for the effectiveness of oral vitamin D supplements in patients with psoriasis. Hence, the aim of the present study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of oral vitamin D supplementation in lessening disease severity of patients with psoriasis. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed on the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central and the gray literature for retrieving randomized controlled trials comparing oral vitamin D supplementation with placebo. The primary outcome was the change of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. We used the random effects model for synthesizing the evidence. RESULTS: Of the total 5018 search results, 4 studies were included in the qualitative and 3 studies in quantitative analysis. Vitamin D supplementation was effective in ameliorating the PASI score after 6 mo of intervention (mean difference [MD] = -0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.72 to -0.11). However, after the Hartung-Knapp adjustment, the results became non-significant (MD = -0.92, 95% CI = -2.21 to 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: A favorable effect of oral vitamin D supplementation in patients with psoriasis could not be verified. More randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to produce robust results.


Subject(s)
Psoriasis , Vitamin D , Dietary Supplements , Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Severity of Illness Index , Vitamin D/therapeutic use
3.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 69(1): 120-125, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31058775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Despite the fact that pediatric pancreatitis is an uncommon disease, its prevalence has increased in recent years. Nevertheless, until 4 years ago, the lack of nutritional guidelines for pediatric pancreatitis was evident, with all recommendations being based on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for adults. The aim of the present study was to review and critically appraise guidelines for the medical nutrition therapy (MNT) of pediatric pancreatitis. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), the International Guidelines Network, BMJ best practice, and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network to identify CPGs on the MNT of pediatric pancreatitis. The validated AGREE II tool was used for guidelines appraisal by a team of 3 independent multidisciplinary reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 4 CPGs were retrieved with pediatric pancreatitis MNT information. Out of the 4 advising bodies in total, the joint society paper published by the ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN received the highest score in almost all domains, whereas the Belgian consensus obtained the lowest score in all domains but stakeholder involvement, and was not recommended by 2 out of 3 reviewers. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric pancreatitis guidelines appear heterogenous in quality, rigour, and transparency. Our study points out existing gaps and biases in the CPGs, and delineates the need for improving the domains identified as being of low-quality.


Subject(s)
Pancreatitis/diet therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Child , Humans , Nutrition Therapy/methods
4.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 43(4): 490-496, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30320409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe burns are associated with a plethora of profound metabolic, immunologic, and physiologic responses, demanding prompt and adequate management. The objective of the present study was to review, compare, and critically appraise medical nutrition therapy guidelines for adult patients with severe burns, and produce salient points for the future update of relevant guidelines. METHODS: A total of 8 clinical practice guidelines developed by the American Burn Association (ABA), the European Burn Association (EBA), the European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN), the Midlands National Health Service, the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM)/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units and Spanish Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, the Indian Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (IAPEN), and the International Society for Burn Injury regarding medical nutrition therapy in burn patients was independently reviewed by a team of 4 multidisciplinary researchers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS: From the appraised guidelines, the SCCM/ASPEN guidelines received the greatest scoring in the majority of AGREE domains compared with ABA, EBA, and IAPEN, which obtained the lowest scores. On the other hand, the ESPEN guidelines provided the majority of information concerning nutrition support and medical nutrition therapy. CONCLUSION: Our study identified gaps in most nutrition guidelines and emphasized methodologic issues that could improve the quality of future guidelines concerning nutrition support among adult severe burn patients.


Subject(s)
Burns/therapy , Consensus , Nutrition Therapy/methods , Nutrition Therapy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Enteral Nutrition/standards , Europe , Guideline Adherence , Humans , India , MEDLINE , Parenteral Nutrition/standards , Societies, Medical , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...