Comparative spatially explicit approach for testing effects of soil chemicals on terrestrial wildlife bioindicator demographics.

Wildlife species are often used as bioindicators to evaluate the extent and severity of environmental contamination and the effectiveness of remediation practices. A common approach for investigating population- or community-level impacts on bioindicators compares demographic parameter estimates (e.g., population size or density) between sites that were subjected to different levels of contamination. However, the traditional analytical method used in such studies is nonspatial capture-recapture, which results in conclusions about potential relationships between demographics and contaminants being inferred indirectly. Here, we extend this comparative approach to the spatially explicit framework, allowing direct estimation of said relationships and comparisons between study areas, by applying spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models to bioindicator (deer mice [Peromyscus spp.]) detection data from two study areas that were subjected to different industrial activities and remediation practices. Bioindicator density differed by 178% between the neighboring study areas, and the area with the highest soil concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls, chromium, and zinc had the highest bioindicator density. Under the traditional nonspatial approach, we might have concluded that soil chemical levels had negligible influences on demographics. However, by modeling density as a spatial function of select chemical concentrations using SCR models, we found strong support for a positive relationship between density and soil chromium concentrations in one study area (ß = 0.82), which was not masked by or associated with habitat-related metrics. To obtain reliable inferences about potential effects of environmental contamination on bioindicator demographics, we contend that a comparative spatially explicit approach using SCR ought to become standard.

Does Age, Residency, or Feeding Guild Coupled with a Drought Index Predict Avian Health during Fall Migration?

Birds are good indicators of environmental change and are often studied for responses to climate. Many studies focus on breeding birds, while fewer look at the migration period, which is a critical time for many birds. Birds are more susceptible to unusual climatic events during their migration due to the metabolic stress of long-distance movements. In the fall of 2020, an unusual cold weather event coupled with drought and wildfire smoke led to a large avian mortality event in New Mexico. Later analysis pointed to the mortality being largely due to starvation. This was the impetus for our research. We used 11 years of fall bird banding data from two locations, along with local drought indices, to determine what predicts avian health during the migration period. We used fat score data from over 15,000 individual birds to assess whether drought indices, age, diet, or residency influenced avian health using multiple logistic regression. We found that the probability of positive fat scores decreased as drought severity increased for younger, insectivorous, migratory birds. Insectivores had a higher probability of receiving a fat score greater than zero relative to local drought conditions, which is important, since many North American insectivores are in steep decline. Migratory birds showed a greater response than year-round residents, and older birds showed a lower but significant response compared to hatch-year birds. Our results suggest that migratory insectivores in the southwestern United States may be less resilient to drought-related climate change.