Effects of prolonged-release melatonin, zolpidem, and their combination on psychomotor functions, memory recall, and driving skills in healthy middle aged and elderly volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Melatonin is an important regulator of the sleep-wake cycle. A prolonged-release formulation of melatonin (PR-M) that essentially mimics the profile of the endogenous production of the hormone is effective in the treatment of insomnia in patients aged 55 years and older. Because hypnotics result in impairments of various cognitive skills, it is important to examine the cognitive effects associated with the use of PR-M. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The effects of therapeutic oral doses of PR-M (2 mg), zolpidem (10 mg) and their combination administered at bedtime on cognitive functions in healthy subjects aged 55 years and older (12 males + 4 females, age 59.4 +/- 3.2 years) were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and four-way crossover study. Psychomotor functions, memory recall, and driving skills were assessed at 1 and 4 h following administration and the next morning. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, PR-M alone did not impaired performances on any cognitive tasks. Zolpidem significantly impaired psychomotor and driving performance 1 h and 4 h post-dosing, and early memory recall; these impairment were exacerbated with PR-M co-administration. No effects on next morning psychomotor or driving performance were observed except that the decline in memory recall after zolpidem was more pronounced in the next day. No pharmacokinetic interactions were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study extends previous researches showing impairment of cognitive functions by zolpidem within 5 h post-administration. Further, PR-M use was not found associated with impairment of psychomotor functions, memory recall, and driving skills, and point to a pharmacodynamic interaction between melatonin and GABA-A modulators.

Short-term treatment with gaboxadol improves sleep maintenance and enhances slow wave sleep in adult patients with primary insomnia.

RATIONALE: Gaboxadol is a selective extrasynaptic GABA(A) agonist, previously in development for the treatment of insomniac patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acute efficacy and safety of gaboxadol in primary insomnia (PI). METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, four-way crossover, polysomnograph study comparing gaboxadol 10 and 20 mg (GBX20) to placebo in 40 adults with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, criteria for PI. Zolpidem 10 mg was used as an active reference. Treatment was administered on two consecutive nights in each treatment session. Next-day residual effects were evaluated 2 and 9 h after lights on. RESULTS: Efficacy analysis included the per-protocol population (n = 38) from night 2. GBX20 reduced wake after sleep onset (p < 0.01). Both doses of gaboxadol, but not zolpidem, reduced the number of night awakenings (p < 0.001). GBX20 and zolpidem increased total sleep time (p < 0.05). Neither dose of gaboxadol nor zolpidem significantly reduced sleep onset latency, although a trend was seen for zolpidem. Gaboxadol enhanced slow wave sleep (SWS) dose-dependently (gaboxadol 10 mg: p < 0.01, GBX20: p < 0.001). Patients reported improved sleep quality following GBX20 (p < 0.05). Both doses of gaboxadol were generally well tolerated with almost exclusively mild to moderately severe adverse events (AEs). More frequent and severe AEs followed GBX20. No serious AEs were reported. No drug treatment was associated with next-day residual effects. CONCLUSION: Acute administration of gaboxadol improves sleep maintenance and enhances SWS in a dose-dependent manner in adult patients with PI. Gaboxadol was not associated with next-day residual effects. Gaboxadol was generally well tolerated, although gaboxadol showed a dose-dependent increase in incidence and severity of AEs.