Treatment of micropollutants in wastewater: Balancing effectiveness, costs and implications.

In this contribution, we analyse scenarios of advanced wastewater treatment for the removal of micropollutants. By this we refer to current mainstream, broad spectrum processes including ozonation and sorption onto activated carbon. We argue that advanced treatment requires properly implemented tertiary (nutrient removal) treatment in order to be effective. We review the critical aspects of the main advanced treatment options, their advantages and disadvantages. We propose a quantification of the costs of implementing advanced treatment, as well as upgrading plants from secondary to tertiary treatment when needed, and we illustrate what drives the costs of advanced treatment for a set of standard configurations. We propose a cost function to represent the total costs (investment, operation and maintenance) of advanced treatment. We quantify the implications of advanced treatment in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. Based on the indicators of total toxic discharge, toxicity at the discharge points and toxicity across the stream network discussed in Pistocchi et al. (2022), we compare costs and effectiveness of different scenarios of advanced treatment. In principle the total toxic load and toxicity at the points of discharge could be reduced by about 75 % if advanced treatment processes were implemented virtually at all wastewater treatment plants, but this would entail costs of about 4 billion euro/year for the European Union as a whole. We consider a "compromise" scenario where advanced treatment is required at plants of 100 thousand population equivalents (PE) or larger, or at plants between 10 and 100 thousand PE if the dilution ratio at the discharge point is 10 or less. Under this scenario, the length of the stream network exposed to high toxicity would not increase significantly compared to the previous scenario, and the other indicators would not deteriorate significantly, while the costs would remain at about 1.5 billion Euro/year. Arguably, costs could be further reduced, without a worsening of water quality, if we replace a local risk assessment to generic criteria of plant capacity and dilution in order to determine if a WWTP requires advanced treatment.

Quantitative system for diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis.

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal infections are one of the most common reason for gynecological consultations. Many of them are the result of overgrowth of resident microorganisms. The clinical symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis are nonspecific and an accurate diagnosis is a problem that often leads to inadequate treatment or delays in treatment. The lack of an exact and practical diagnostic method is a common cause of misdiagnosis. AIM: To create a complex, quantitative method for the diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis which to enables differentiation from vaginal fungal colonization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 2306 vaginal samples were examined. Clinical, microbiological, epidemiological methods and statistical models are used. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The proposed score system is a specific, sensitive and inexpensive method to routinely diagnose vulvovaginal candidiasis. Statistical processing of the obtained data shows the impact of the individual components on which the method is based: the presence of vaginal discharge, pruritus, direct microscopy and assessment of the fungal growth. The data analysis reveals good sensitivity (71%) and high specificity (98%) of the method. This allows accurate interpretation of the result of the clinical and microbiological examination of each patient. CONCLUSION: The system for diagnosing vulvovaginal candidiasis is complex and based on quantitative indicators. The method can be used to differentiate vulvovaginal candidiasis from vaginal fungal colonization (the cut-off value is 5.5 points) and to more accurately interpret a Candida positive result from quantitative real-time PCR in asymptomatic patients or in women with mixed vaginal infection.

[EPIDEMIOLOGICAL, CLINICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN WOMEN WITH AEROBIC VAGINITIS].

Aerobic vaginitis (AV) is an alterarion of the normal lactobacillic flora accompanied by signs of inflammation, presence of mainly aerobic microorganisms from intestinal commensals or other aerobic pathogens. Clinical symptoms may vary by type and intensity and are marked by a high tendency for recurrence and chronification. Inflammation and ulcerations in AV could increase the risk of contracting HIV or other sexually transmitted infections. The aim is to study some epidemiological, clinical and microbiological features of the aerobic vaginitis in patients of the specialized Obstetric and Gynecological Clinic in Plovdiv, Bulgaria. In a retrospective research 4687 vaginal smears have been gathered in Microbiological laboratory at "St. George" Hospital - Plovdiv. We used clinical, microbiological and statistical methods. Information processing is performed by variation, alternative, correlation and graphical analysis using specialized package SPSS v13.0. The overall prevalence rate of AV in the studied population is 11.77%. The levels of prevalence of AV in pregnant and non-pregnant women are respectively 13.08% and 4.34%. The highest frequency of AV is in the age group 21-30 years (32.3%). The results show a marked association between Escherichia coli and the cases of AV (p < 0.001). AV is a common cause of vaginal symptoms in patients of specialized ambulatory outpatient. One in ten women with vaginal complaints suffers from AV Streptococcus agalactiae and Escherichia coli are most often isolated aerobic microorganisms.