ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Deltoid muscle function is paramount to the success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of deltoid volume on shoulder range of motion and patient-reported outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff-intact and rotator cuff-deficient conditions. METHODS: Retrospective review of records identified 107 patients who met inclusion criteria. The rotator cuff integrity was evaluated by two musculoskeletal-trained radiologists. Volumetric deltoid measurements were calculated from preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Satisfactory outcomes were defined as forward elevation of at least 135°, external rotation of at least 35°, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores of at least 70. RESULTS: Mean total deltoid muscle volume was significantly higher in patients with satisfactory forward elevation (57.8 ± 18.1 cm³) versus unsatisfactory forward elevation (48.6 ± 19.5 cm³) (p = 0.013). When separated by rotator cuff integrity, total deltoid volume was significantly higher (p = 0.030) in patients who achieved satisfactory forward elevation in the rotator cuff-deficient group but not the rotator cuff-intact group (p = 0.533). DISCUSSION: Preoperative deltoid volume directly correlated with achieving satisfactory forward elevation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff-deficient conditions and may be one factor in determining the ability to achieve satisfactory outcomes in the rotator cuff-deficient patient.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in interventional radiology procedural fluoroscopy time (FT) for radiology residents versus staff radiologists, using central venous catheter (CVC) placement as an index service. METHODS: To minimize interservice and complexity variables, stand-alone temporary internal jugular CVC procedures were targeted for analysis. Reports and images from 1,067 temporary CVC services from 2 hospitals over 2 years were reviewed as part of a quality improvement initiative. Insertion site, catheter type (eg, smaller triple lumen versus larger hemodialysis), resident identifier, staff identifier, and documented FT were compiled and analyzed. RESULTS: Applying clinical (eg, concomitant venous angioplasty) and anatomic (eg, femoral access) exclusions, 537 cases with complete CVC procedure records were available for analysis. Radiology residents and staff radiologists were primary operators in 128 and 409 procedures, respectively. Distribution of resident procedures (82% right, 66% large lumen) was similar to that of staff (79% right, 63% large lumen). Mean FT of resident services was twice as long as that of staff services (1.24 minutes versus 0.63 minutes, P < .0001). Resident FT was independent of supervising staff radiologist. Increasing years of training for residents did not significantly reduce FT. CONCLUSIONS: When CVCs are placed by radiology residents, FT is double that for identical procedures performed by staff radiologists. Similar discrepancies likely exist for other interventional radiologic procedures. Residency training programs should initiate measures to monitor and manage fluoroscopy during interventional procedures to minimize radiation dose to patients, trainees, and other staff.
