Preclinical and clinical evaluation of four gemcitabine plus carboplatin schedules as front-line treatment for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To explore the activity and tolerability of gemcitabine (GEM) and carboplatin (CBDCA) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) we tested four administration sequences on H460 NSCLC cells, and at the same time performed a randomized phase II trial using analogous schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: GEM was given first in two in vitro sequences, and CBDCA first in the other two; interaction was quantified calculating a combination index. Eighty-eight chemotherapy-naïve, stage IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive either: GEM (1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 and CBDCA (AUC 5 mg.min/ml) on day 1, 4 h before GEM (arm A); same as arm A except CBDCA given 4 h after GEM (arm B); GEM on days 1 and 8 and CBDCA on day 2 (arm C); GEM on days 2 and 9 and CBDCA on day 1 (arm D). Courses were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: In the preclinical study, CBDCA given before GEM produced a synergistic cytotoxic effect. Two complete and 29 partial responses occurred in 86 of 88 treated patients (intention-to-treat analysis 35%; 95% confidence interval 25.5% to 46.8%). One- and 2-year survivals were 44% and 11%, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11%; grade 3/4 neutropenia in 17%; and non-hematological toxicity was insignificant. Median survival was 11 months (range 7-18+), but better in patients receiving CBDCA first (arms A and D) (13 versus 9 months) than in patients receiving GEM first (arms B and C). The response was greater (50% versus 31%) in arm A than in the other arms. CONCLUSIONS: The CBDCA/GEM combination is safe and active against stage IV NSCLC. Our preclinical and clinical findings suggest that administration of CBDCA before GEM gives the better outcome.

Single-agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine for pretreated or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: At least half of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) present at diagnosis with metastatic disease, and most patients in a locally advanced phase will develop metastases despite potentially curative local therapy. Thus, the majority of patients with SCCE will become candidate for palliative chemotherapy. Only a few drugs have demonstrated moderate activity (>15%) against SCCE. The main purpose of this phase II trial was to assess the activity of vinorelbine, a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with a wide spectrum of action, in advanced or relapsed SCCE. METHODS: Seventeen patients were included in the trial. Eleven of them had already received chemotherapy (cisplatin and fluorouracil) and/or radiotherapy at the time of the first diagnosis. All patients were treated with vinorelbine at the dose of 30 mg/m2 every two weeks. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 17 patients enrolled in the trial were assessable for activity: partial responses were observed in 4 of the 16 (25%), and 3 of them were pre-treated patients. A significant improvement of dysphagia was obtained in 4 of 11 symptomatic patients. Toxicity was mild, with only one episode of grade 4 neutropenia and constipation. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, single-agent vinorelbine is active against SCCE. It was also active in patients previously treated with cisplatin and fluorouracil. The good tolerability and the possibility of relieving symptoms such as dysphagia strongly suggest the addition of vinorelbine to combination regimens with cisplatin as front-line chemotherapy for SCCE.

New clinical trials for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

In oncology there is an increasing interest in neuroendocrine tumors, whose incidence is generally considered low, although in a recent analysis of 5,468 cases there was an increase in the proportion of pulmonary and gastric carcinoids and a decrease in the appendiceal carcinoids. However carcinoid tumors are indolent and their diagnosis is often difficult to carry out, so the true incidence may be higher. Surgery remains the treatment of choice and it should always be considered in patients with neuroendocrine tumors although a complete cure is difficult to obtain. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is the medical treatment for highly proliferating neuroendocrine tumors, but it has showed a modest benefit. Somatostatin analogues, octreotide and lanreotide are the standard hormonal treatment for neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, two trials on lanreotide and octreotide have been published, and it is worth noting that in each trial a long-acting formulation has been used: for lanreotide a prolonged-release formulation (PR) which allows an injection of 30 mg every 2 weeks, and for octreotide a long-acting release formulation (LAR) which allows an injection of 10, 20 or 30 mg every 28 days. The results of each trial are very promising. However, there are methodological and clinical aspects which make it difficult to carry out new trials for studying neuroendocrine tumors. The increasing number of biological markers deserve further investigations before their wide use in clinical practice.

Chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer patients: results of a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The combination of radiotherapy and fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with locally unresectable pancreatic carcinoma has led to a significant increase in survival in comparison with radiotherapy alone. Doxifluridine (5-DFUR) is an orally active fluoropyrimidine, and its cytotoxic metabolite (5-FU) may concentrate in areas of high tumor vascularization. This trial was carried out with the aims of improving locoregional control and making lesions resectable in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: 5-DFUR was given at a dose of 500 mg/m2 b.i.d. by way of mouth for 4 days every other week for a total of four courses, with leucovorin 25 mg b.i.d. orally being given 2 hours before each 5-DFUR administration. External beam RT was administered at a dose of 1000 cGy per week for 3 weeks, followed by a 2-week break and then by 1000 cGy per week for a further 2 weeks (a total dose of 5000 cGy). The patients were restaged 4 weeks after the end of treatment and explored for resection in cases of partial response (PR). RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were treated between 1992 and 1997. Ab initio unresectability was shown by laparotomy (16 cases) or computed tomography (16 cases), and was due to vascular invasion in 27 patients, massive regional nodal metastases in nine, and both in four. The median age was 63 years (range 36-71); performance status (PS) (ECOG): 0-1 = 28 and PS 2 = 4. All the patients had measurable disease and were evaluable for response. There were seven PR (22%), 10 SD (31%), and 15 PD (47%). All of the responders underwent surgical exploration, and radical resection was possible in 5. Three of these patients are still disease-free with a follow-up of 18, 27, and 65 months; the other two cases relapsed 11 and 14 months after surgery. The median survival time was 9 months for the entire group, and 1-year survival rate was 31%. The treatment was never stopped because of toxicity. There were no CTC-NCI grade 3 or 4 toxic events; grade 1-2 diarrhea was observed in 10 cases. CONCLUSIONS: This preoperative regimen was feasible and led to a successful surgical resection in 16% of otherwise inoperable cases. The median survival was comparable with the results obtained after 5-FU infusion plus radiotherapy. The resectability rate, and the benefit in terms of survival in the resected patients, make these results worthy of confirmation by larger studies.