Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in the Treatment of Status Asthmaticus.

OBJECTIVES: Venovenous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal may be lifesaving in the setting of status asthmaticus. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Medical ICU. PATIENTS: Twenty-six adult patients with status asthmaticus treated with venovenous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic data and characteristics of current and prior asthma treatments were obtained from the electronic medical record. Mechanical ventilator settings, arterial blood gases, vital signs, and use of vasopressors were collected from the closest time prior to cannulation and 24 hours after initiation of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal settings, including blood flow and sweep gas flow, were collected at 24 hours after initiation of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Outcome measures included rates of survival to hospital discharge, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal support, and complications during extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Following the initiation of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, blood gas values were significantly improved at 24 hours, as were peak airway pressures, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, and use of vasopressors. Survival to hospital discharge was 100%. Twenty patients (76.9%) were successfully extubated while receiving extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal support; none required reintubation. The most common complication was cannula-associated deep venous thrombosis (six patients, 23.1%). Four patients (15.4%) experienced bleeding that required a transfusion of packed RBCs. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series to date, use of venovenous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients with status asthmaticus can provide a lifesaving means of support until the resolution of the exacerbation, with an acceptably low rate of complications. Early extubation in select patients receiving extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal is safe and feasible and avoids the deleterious effects of positive-pressure mechanical ventilation in this patient population.

Effect of Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody Value on Waitlist Outcomes for Lung Transplant Candidates.

BACKGROUND We conducted a retrospective cohort study using United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) data to determine the effect of the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) value on waitlist outcomes for lung transplant candidates. MATERIAL AND METHODS We divided lung transplant candidates into groups based on their cPRA value at the time of waitlist activation (0-25%, 25.1-50%, 50.1-75%, and 75.1-100%) and compared each group's waitlist outcomes to the lowest quartile ("minimally sensitized") group. The primary outcome was lung transplantation and the secondary outcome was waitlist mortality (a composite of death on the waitlist/delisting for clinical deterioration). RESULTS Compared to the minimally sensitized group, candidates with a cPRA value of 25.1-50% did not have a significantly different likelihood of undergoing lung transplant or waitlist mortality, candidates with a cPRA value of 50.1-75% were 25% less likely to undergo lung transplant and 44% more likely to die on the waitlist, and candidates with a cPRA value of 75.1-100% were 52% less likely to undergo lung transplant and 92% more likely to die on the waitlist. CONCLUSIONS CPRA values of greater than 50% are associated with significantly lower rates of transplantation and higher waitlist mortality.

Lung volume reduction surgery in the post-National Emphysema Treatment Trial era.

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) as means to improve the pulmonary function and quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be traced back to the 1950's and early work by Otto Brantigan. Joel Cooper revived this concept with pioneering work in the 1990's. His work, along with others, led to the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) which demonstrated a quality of life and survival benefit for certain subsets of patients with emphysema. While the outcomes of carefully selected patients are excellent, with proven benefits in both quality of life and overall survival, the volume of LVRS being performed remains low. The procedure is highly regulated in the United States and is only performed in Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) approved programs. Programs are required to follow the NETT selection criteria. The program at Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital remains active. Utilizing the NETT criteria, we continue to perform LVRS with no operative mortality and excellent long-term outcomes.