Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan: A Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Trastuzumab deruxtecan is a monoclonal antibody linked to a chemotherapy moiety that was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancers. There are labeled black box warnings for interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis and embryo-fetal toxicity. Additionally, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) was reported to be as high as 78% (∼8% grade 3 or higher) in phase I and II clinical trials. Clinical trial and package insert recommendations for the management of CINV are not available, making real-world management difficult. CASE PRESENTATION: We reviewed the first 10 patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan at our hospital-based community cancer center to determine if CINV management was adequate. We found a rate of 28.9% CINV (all grade 1 and 2) despite treatment as a moderate emetic potential regimen. Interventions by the treatment team to manage trastuzumab deruxtecan as a high-risk emetic regimen resulted in reduced CINV and ongoing treatment for all patients. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This review indicates that management of CINV for patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan should follow recommendations for regimens with a high-risk emetic potential.

Cryptococcal infections in two patients receiving ibrutinib therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Cryptococcal infections are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Reports of these infections in patients on small molecular kinase inhibitors have not been widely reported in clinical trials. We describe one case of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis and one case of cryptococcal pneumonia in two patients who were receiving ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Despite different sites of cryptococcal infection, both patients had similar presentations of acute illness. Patient 1 was worked up for health care-associated pneumonia, as well as acute sinusitis prior to the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. He also had a more complex past medical history than patient 2. Patient 2 developed atrial fibrillation from ibrutinib prior to admission for presumed health care-associated pneumonia. Cryptococcal antigen testing was done sooner in this patient due to patient receiving high-dose steroids for the treatment of underlying hemolytic anemia. We conclude that patients who develop acute illness while receiving ibrutinib should be considered for cryptococcal antigen testing.

Risk of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis and Bleeding in Veterans With Malignancy Who Are Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

The low incidence of venous thromboembolism formation in this study and similar rates of bleeding in other clinical trials indicate that direct oral anticoagulant agents are safe alternatives in patients with cancer.

Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing: An update on current literature.

PURPOSE: The advantages and disadvantages of once-daily versus conventional dosing of aminoglycoside antibiotics are reviewed. SUMMARY: Although administration of multiple daily doses remains the standard method of aminoglycoside dosing, once-daily dosing may provide enhanced clinical efficacy and reduced toxicity in selected patient populations; demonstrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages include enhanced postantibiotic effect and an increased likelihood of a high ratio of serum peak concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration. Published evidence identified in a MEDLINE search covering the period 1985-2014 indicates that once-daily high-dose aminoglycoside therapy generally provides clinical effectiveness equivalent or superior to that of multiple-daily dosing. The risk of nephrotoxicity appears to be comparable with once- and multiple-daily aminoglycoside dosing. Several nomograms have been developed to facilitate once-daily dosing; the Hartford nomogram (using a dose of 7 mg/kg) is the most extensively tested and generally considered the most reliable. However, although those nomograms are convenient to use and may reduce expenses, a daily dosing regimen determined by individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring is likely to be more effective for achieving specific serum concentrations and may be a preferable approach for some patients. Patients who are pregnant or have liver failure, severe renal insufficiency, serious illness, or nutritional deficiency are not appropriate candidates for once-daily dosing. CONCLUSION: Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing is an effective, well-established method to achieve therapeutic efficacy while limiting the risk of toxicity and simplifying the processes of dosing and monitoring.