Spinal-induced hypotension in elderly patients with hip fracture. A comparison of glucose-free bupivacaine with glucose-free bupivacaine and fentanyl.

Intraoperative hypotension is a common and potentially deleterious event in elderly patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for repair of hip fractures. The synergism between intrathecal opioids and local anaesthetics may allow a reduction in the dose of local anaesthetic and cause less sympathetic block and hypotension, while still maintaining adequate anaesthesia. We studied 40 elderly patients having either an insertion of a dynamic hip screw or a hemiarthroplasty and compared 9.0 mg glucose-free bupivacaine with added fentanyl 20 microg (group BF) with 11.0 m glucose-free bupivacaine alone (group B). Hypotension was defined as a fall in systolic blood pressure to less than 75% baseline or less than 90 mmHg. The incidence and frequency of hypotension in group BF were less than in group B. Similarly, falls in systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures were all less in group BF than in group B. However, there were four failed blocks in group BF and one in group B.

Randomized evaluation of the single-use SoftSeal and the re-useable LMA Classic laryngeal mask.

A number of laryngeal masks are available, including both re-usable and single-use masks. Single-use laryngeal masks may decrease the risk of transmitting prion infections. We performed a single-blind randomized trial in 200 spontaneously breathing female patients under general anaesthesia with nitrous oxide, to compare a new single-use laryngeal mask, the SoftSeal (Portex Ltd, U.K.), with a re-usable laryngeal mask, the LMA Classic (Laryngeal Mask Company Ltd., Cyprus). The primary outcome was successful insertion at the first attempt. Size 4 single-use (n = 99) or re-usable (n = 100) laryngeal masks, inserted by experienced anaesthetists, were equivalent for successful placement at the first attempt (90% versus 91% respectively). The single-use mask was less easy to insert (47% difficult versus 9%, P < 0.001). Clinical and anatomical tests of position and function were similar. The cuff pressure of the re-usable mask increased significantly compared with the single-use mask (median +10 cm versus -2 cm H2O, P < 0.001). Forty per cent of patients allocated the single-use mask and 20% of those allocated the re-usable mask experienced sore throat at 24 hours postoperatively (P < 0.05). An estimation of cost per patient use was greater for the re-usable mask. We conclude that the SoftSeal single-use laryngeal mask and the LMA Classic re-usable laryngeal mask airway are of similar clinical utility in terms of successful insertion and airway maintenance. The re-usable laryngeal mask was easier to insert and associated with less postoperative sore throat, but costs were higher.