Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness ; 55(9): 978-87, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24710395

ABSTRACT

AIM: There is a longstanding debate over the long-term effect of intensive endurance training on cardiac function. Usually, echocardiography has been used as a global evaluation of left ventricular (LV) or right ventricular (RV) function and dimensions. Recently, speckle tracking strain (ST) has provided an analysis of regional RV and LV function. Thus, the intention of the study was to carefully evaluate cardiac function in a group of former world class swimmers applying longitudinal strain (LS) and circumferential strain (CS) analysis. METHODS: Twelve athletes (45±1.5 years) of a former training group involved in high intensity endurance training were examined 24.9±4.3 years after the end of their active swimming career. An echocardiography was performed and LV function was analyzed based on CS and LS. Also, LS was evaluated for the RV. All measurements were performed for epicardium and endocardium independently. RESULTS: Mean LV endocardial LS was -20.0±6.3 and epicardial LS -20.2±6.2. LV endocardial CS was -21.3±8.0 and epicardial CS -11.9±4.2. RV endocardial LS had a mean value of -26.4±6.1 and epicardial LS of -28.2±5.6. CONCLUSION: Twenty-five years after the cessation of endurance training, there was no evidence of a deterioration of RV or LV function as values for RV and LV strain measurements were within normal ranges.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Swimming/physiology , Ventricular Function/physiology , Echocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors
2.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 61(1): 51-7, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10695647

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few data are available to guide treatment selection in major depression. With increasing pressure to maximize the efficiency and minimize the costs of treatment, it is important to have information that could guide treatment selection or point to treatment strategies that have a high probability of success. METHOD: We used a successive cohort approach to compare 2 highly similar groups of women with recurrent unipolar disorder (DSM-III-R or DSM-IV): one in which the combination of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and pharmacotherapy was initiated at the outset of treatment and a second in which IPT alone was provided first and only those who did not remit with IPT alone were offered the combination treatment. RESULTS: In the group in which the combination was initiated at the outset of treatment (N = 180), the remission rate was 66%, comparable to the remission rate observed in most outpatient treatment studies of major depression. In contrast, among the women in the second cohort who were first treated with IPT alone and only those who did not remit were given combination therapy (N = 159), the remission rate was 79%, significantly greater than that observed in the group that received combination treatment from the outset (chi2 = 6.55, p = .02). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the strategy of offering IPT to women with recurrent unipolar disorder and, in the absence of remission, adding antidepressant pharmacotherapy can be a highly effective treatment, one that may be particularly attractive to women in the childbearing years. Although slower in its onset of action, this sequential strategy is likely to enable the clear majority of such women to achieve a full remission of depressive symptoms.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Imipramine/therapeutic use , Psychotherapy/methods , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/administration & dosage , Clinical Protocols , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Imipramine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Recurrence , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Bipolar Disord ; 2(2): 120-30, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11252651

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Combination treatment, rather than monotherapy, is prevalent in the treatment of subjects with bipolar disorder, probably due to the complex and phasic nature of the illness. In general, prescription patterns may be influenced by the demographic characteristics of patients as well. We evaluated prescription patterns and the influence of demographic variables on these patterns in a voluntary registry of subjects with bipolar disorder. METHODS: A subset of data from a larger voluntary registry was extracted for demographic variables and psychotropic medication use that had been reported in the month prior to registration by ambulatory, non-hospitalized subjects with bipolar I disorder in 1995/96 (n = 457). RESULTS: Among the thymoleptic agents, lithium was prescribed in over 50% of subjects, valproate in approximately 40%, and carbamazepine in 11% of subjects. Eighteen percent of subjects had no prescription for thymoleptic agents. Nearly one-third of all subjects were receiving antipsychotic agents, of whom two-thirds were receiving the traditional neuroleptic agents. More than half of all subjects were receiving concomitant antidepressants, of whom nearly 50% received the SSRI antidepressants and nearly 25% received buproprion. Approximately 40% of subjects received benzodiazepines. Only 18% of subjects received monotherapy, and nearly 50% received three or more psychotropic agents. In general, no associations were noted between demographic parameters including age, gender, marital or educational status, and psychotropic prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the anecdotal reports, these data confirm that combination treatment is far more common than monotherapy. Demography appears to have a minimal impact on cross-sectional prescription patterns in subjects with bipolar disorder. Given that combination treatments are the rule rather than the exception, we should strive to achieve rational, yet pragmatic, treatment guidelines and algorithms to minimize the risks while maximizing the benefits of these combination treatments for patients with bipolar disorder.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Pennsylvania , Registries , Retrospective Studies
4.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 21(2): 258-67, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10432474

ABSTRACT

We examined whether fluoxetine treatment has persistent effects on electroencephalographic sleep after drug discontinuation in patients with recurrent major depression. Age-matched groups of 23 women were treated with interpersonal psychotherapy alone (IPT) or fluoxetine plus interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT + FLU). Sleep studies were conducted when patients were depressed, and again at remission, at least four weeks after fluoxetine discontinuation. The groups did not differ in depression ratings pre- to post-treatment. Significant group*time interaction effects were noted for REM sleep (p = .04) and slow wave sleep (p = .02). REM percentage and phasic REM activity increased in the IPT + FLU group but decreased in the IPT group. The effects of fluoxetine treatment on electroencephalographic sleep can be observed for at least four weeks after drug discontinuation and appear to represent both drug discontinuation and neuroadaptation effects.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/physiopathology , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Psychotherapy , Sleep/drug effects , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Female , Humans , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Recurrence , Sleep Stages/drug effects
5.
Am J Psychiatry ; 154(10): 1412-6, 1997 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9326824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Primary insomnia and insomnia related to mental disorders are the two most common DSM-IV insomnia diagnoses, but distinguishing between them is difficult in clinical practice. This analysis was performed to identify clinical factors used by sleep specialists to distinguish primary insomnia from insomnia related to mental disorders. METHOD: Clinicians evaluated 216 patients referred for insomnia at five clinical sites, rated a list of clinical factors judged to contribute to each patient's presentation, and assigned diagnoses. Analysis of variance was performed, with contributing factors as the dependent variable and diagnostic group and clinic location as independent variables. RESULTS: Sleep specialists rated a psychiatric disorder as a stronger factor for insomnia related to mental disorders and rated negative conditioning and sleep hygiene as stronger factors for primary insomnia. However, a psychiatric disorder was rated as a contributing factor for 77% of patients who received a first diagnosis of primary insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: While neither sleep hygiene nor negative conditioning is a diagnostic criterion in DSM-IV, these results support the face validity of these clinical factors distinguishing between primary insomnia and insomnia related to mental disorders. The use of a psychiatric disorder as an inclusion criterion for insomnia related to mental disorders and an exclusion criterion for primary insomnia reinforces a categorical distinction between the two diagnoses, but the contribution of psychiatric symptoms in primary insomnia appears to be a clinically relevant one. These findings suggest the need for studies on the validity of negative conditioning and sleep hygiene in the etiology of primary insomnia, as well as on the significance of psychiatric disorders, especially depression, in primary insomnia.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Comorbidity , Diagnosis, Differential , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Sleep/physiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/psychology
6.
Sleep ; 20(7): 542-52, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9322270

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine whether sleep specialists and nonspecialists recommend different treatments for different insomnia diagnoses according to two different diagnostic classifications. Two hundred sixteen patients with chronic insomnia at five sites were each interviewed by two clinicians: one sleep specialist and one nonsleep specialist. All interviewers indicated diagnoses using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV); sleep specialists also indicated diagnoses according to the International Classification for Sleep Disorders (ICSD). Interviewers then indicated how strongly they would recommend each item in a standard list of treatment and diagnostic interventions for each patient. We examined differences in treatment recommendations among the six most common DSM-IV diagnoses assigned by sleep specialists at different sites (n = 192), among the six most common ICSD diagnoses assigned by sleep specialists at different sites (n = 153), and among the six most common DSM-IV diagnoses assigned by nonspecialists at different sites (n = 186). In each analysis, specific treatment and polysomnography recommendations differed significantly for different diagnoses, using either DSM-IV or ICSD criteria. Conversely, different diagnoses were associated with different rank orderings of specific treatment and diagnostic recommendations. Sleep specialist and nonspecialist interviewers each distinguished treatment recommendations among different diagnoses, but in general, nonspecialists more strongly recommended medications and relaxation treatments. Significant site-related differences in treatment recommendations also emerged. Differences in treatment recommendations support the distinction between different DSM-IV and ICSD diagnoses, although they do not provide formal validation. Site-related differences suggest a lack of consensus in how these disorders are conceptualized and treated.


Subject(s)
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
7.
J Psychiatr Res ; 29(5): 407-16, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8748065

ABSTRACT

Theoretical models of depression have hypothesized phase or amplitude alterations in circadian measures including the sleep-wake rhythm. Whether such abnormalities occur only during the depressed state, or whether they persist into recovery, is less clear. We investigated the circadian pattern of unintended sleep episodes during 36 h of constant wakeful bedrest in two groups: 26 drug-free patients whose depression remitted following psychotherapy treatment, and a contrast group of 17 healthy young adults. The contrast group was not matched for age or gender. Both remitted depressed and contrast groups showed statistically significant linear and quadratic trends in the number of unintended sleep episodes, indicating monotonic and circadian influences across the study interval. We found no significant group differences in the pattern of sleep episodes. The number and timing of sleep episodes did not correlate significantly with core body temperature amplitude or timing or with baseline sleep duration or efficiency. The results do not support the hypothesis of a phase or amplitude change in sleep propensity as a trait abnormality in depression. However, the inclusion of a moderately depressed out-patient cohort, which showed only minor sleep changes and normal temperature profiles even while depressed, may have biased against finding significant differences.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Depressive Disorder/physiopathology , Sleep Stages/physiology , Adult , Arousal/physiology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Psychotherapy , Treatment Outcome , Wakefulness/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...