Comparison of traditional advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) course instruction vs. a scenario-based, performance oriented team instruction (SPOTI) method for Korean paramedic students.

Current Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course instruction involves a 2-day course with traditional lectures and limited team interaction. We wish to explore the advantages of a scenario-based performance-oriented team instruction (SPOTI) method to implement core ACLS skills for non-English-speaking international paramedic students. The objective of this study was to determine if scenario-based, performance-oriented team instruction (SPOTI) improves educational outcomes for the ACLS instruction of Korean paramedic students. Thirty Korean paramedic students were randomly selected into two groups. One group of 15 students was taught the traditional ACLS course. The other 15 students were instructed using a SPOTI method. Each group was tested using ACLS megacode examinations endorsed by the American Heart Association. All 30 students passed the ACLS megacode examination. In the traditional ACLS study group an average of 85% of the core skills were met. In the SPOTI study group an average of 93% of the core skills were met. In particular, the SPOTI study group excelled at physical examination skills such as airway opening, assessment of breathing, signs of circulation, and compression rates. In addition, the SPOTI group performed with higher marks on rhythm recognition compared to the traditional group. The traditional group performed with higher marks at providing proper drug dosages compared to the SPOTI students. However, the students enrolled in the SPOTI method resulted in higher megacode core compliance scores compared to students trained in traditional ACLS course instruction. These differences did not achieve statistical significance due to the small sample size.

Basic life support cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

CPR represents the primary intervention used during cardiac arrest for maintaining perfusion and extending the potential resuscitation period. Effective CPR, however, requires careful attention to detail by the resuscitation team, including (1) effective control of the airway using manual maneuvers or airway adjuncts, (2) delivery of effective ventilation that assures adequate oxygenation, while reducing the chance for gastric inflation, and (3) chest compressions delivered at the appropriate depth and rate using a duty cycle of 50% compression and 50% release. During the resuscitation effort team leaders should closely monitor the performance of CPR, rotate rescuers frequently to avoid fatigue, and provide continuous feedback based upon direct (transmitted pulse, chest rise) and indirect (end-tidal CO2) measures of effectiveness. A careful and measured approach to CPR performance, combined with a strong chain of survival, provides victims of cardiac arrest the best chance for survival.