[What is known about the diagnosis and treatment of herpes labialis?] / Wat is er bekend over de diagnostiek en behandeling van herpes labialis?

Herpes labialis is one of the most common skin infections. In most people it is asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, but very severe cases do occur. Herpes remains latent and can recur. Herpes labialis is a clinical diagnosis. If in doubt, additional testing can be carried out, usually polymerase chain reaction. There are no treatments that can eliminate the virus. In case of more severe symptoms and frequent recurrences, there may be an indication for treatment. In case of mild complaints, topical zinc sulphate/zinc oxide and analgesics (systemic or topical lidocaine) will suffice. More severe complaints and frequent recurrences can be treated with antiviral creams (Aciclovir) or with systemic antiviral medication (Valaciclovir). In frequent recurrences, prophylactic Valaciclovir can also be given for a period of many months. Treatment should be started as soon as possible and will slightly shorten the duration of the disease.

[Myositis: more than a muscle disease]. / Myositis is meer dan een spierziekte.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), commonly referred to as "myositis", is a rare but treatable auto-immune disease that is often misdiagnosed or diagnosed after significant delay. Using three clinical case reports as introductory examples, an overview is given - and pitfalls are discussed - of the diagnosis and treatment of myositis. Disease features are often extra-muscular in nature, may vary considerably between patients, and are frequently non-specific. Myositis-related morbidity is high and myositis can be fatal, mainly due to cancer and interstitial lung disease. As such, we stress the importance of early recognition of this severe disease and timely referral of a patient with a (suspected) IIM to a multidisciplinary team for optimal diagnosis and disease management.

Ticking the right boxes: classification of patients suspected of Lyme borreliosis at an academic referral center in the Netherlands.

To provide better care for patients suspected of having Lyme borreliosis (LB) we founded the Amsterdam Multidisciplinary Lyme borreliosis Center (AMLC). The AMLC reflects a collaborative effort of the departments of internal medicine/infectious diseases, rheumatology, neurology, dermatology, medical microbiology and psychiatry. In a retrospective case series, characteristics of 200 adult patients referred to the AMLC were recorded, and patients were classified as having LB, post-treatment LB syndrome (PTLBS), persistent Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) infection despite antibiotic treatment or no LB. In addition, LB, PTLBS and persistent B. burgdorferi s.l. infection cases were classified as 'definite,' 'probable' or 'questionable.' Of the 200 patients, 120 (60%) did not have LB and 31 (16%) had a form of localized or disseminated LB, of which 12 were classified as definite, six as probable and 13 as questionable. In addition, 34 patients (17%) were diagnosed with PTLBS, of which 22 (11%) were probable and 12 (6%) questionable. A total of 15 patients (8%) were diagnosed with persistent B. burgdorferi s.l. infection, of which none was classified as definite, three as probable and 12 as questionable. In conclusion, in line with previous studies, the number of definite and probable (persisting) LB cases was low. The overall high number of questionable cases illustrates the fact that it can sometimes be challenging to either rule out or demonstrate an association with a B. burgdorferi s.l. infection, even in an academic setting. Finally, we were able to establish alternative diagnoses in a large proportion of patients.