Mutational analysis of the DEAD-box RNA helicase eIF4AII characterizes its interaction with transformation suppressor Pdcd4 and eIF4GI.

Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4A unwinds secondary and tertiary structures in the 5'-untranslated region of mRNA, permitting translation initiation. Programmed cell death 4 (Pdcd4) is a novel transformation suppressor and eIF4A-binding partner that inhibits eIF4A helicase activity and translation. To elucidate the regions of eIF4A that are functionally significant in binding to Pdcd4, we generated point mutations of eIF4A. Two-hybrid analysis revealed that five eIF4A mutants completely lost binding to Pdcd4 while four eIF4A mutants retained wild-type levels of binding. The residues that, when mutated, inactivated Pdcd4 binding specified ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis, or RNA binding. With the exception of the Q-motif mutant eIF4AP56L, the eIF4A mutants inactivated for Pdcd4 binding were inactivated for binding to eIF4G (GM, GC, or both) and for enhancing translation. Several eIF4A mutants showing wild-type level binding to Pdcd4 were also inactivated for binding to eIF4G and for enhancing translation. Thus, significant dissociation of eIF4A's Pdcd4- and eIF4G-binding regions appears to occur. Because three of the four eIF4A mutants that retained Pdcd4 binding also suppressed translation activity in a dominant-negative manner, the structure that defines the Pdcd4-binding domain of eIF4A may be necessary but is insufficient for translation. A structural homology model of eIF4A shows regions important for binding to Pdcd4 and/or eIF4G lying on the perimeters of the hinge area of eIF4A. A competition experiment revealed that Pdcd4 competes with C-terminal eIF4G for binding to eIF4A. In summary, the Pdcd4-binding domains on eIF4A impact both binding to eIF4G and translation initiation in cells.

Characterization of programmed cell death 4 in multiple human cancers reveals a novel enhancer of drug sensitivity.

Programmed cell death 4 (Pdcd4), originally identified as an inhibitor of murine cellular transformation, inhibits protein synthesis by directly interacting with eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) of the translation initiation complex. The relevance of Pdcd4 to a broad range of human cancers derived from multiple tissue sites is unknown. Protein expression patterns from the National Cancer Institute drug-screening panel of 60 human cancer cells (NCI60) were analyzed by Western blot methods and revealed frequent reduction of Pdcd4 protein levels in renal-, lung-, and glia-derived tumors. Greater than mean Pdcd4 protein levels correlated with the antitumor activity of geldanamycin and tamoxifen. Stable expression of antisense PDCD4 significantly reduced the sensitivity of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to geldanamycin and to tamoxifen. Sensitivity to geldanamycin significantly increased in UO-31 renal cancer cells expressing sense PDCD4 cDNA. Increased geldanamycin sensitivity was accompanied by enhanced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. One primary mode of inactivation of Pdcd4 in human cancers appears to involve down-regulated expression, and this down-regulation causes a decreased sensitivity to geldanamycin cytotoxicity. Thus, up-regulating Pdcd4 expression may be promising for geldanamycin-based combination therapy.

Pdcd4 suppresses tumor phenotype in JB6 cells by inhibiting AP-1 transactivation.

Transformation suppressor Pdcd4 is downregulated in transformed (Tx) mouse epidermal JB6 RT101 cells relative to transformation-resistant (P-) and susceptible (P+) variants. Whether Pdcd4 downregulation is necessary not only to induce transformation but also to maintain tumor phenotypes has not been determined previously. In the present study, overexpression of Pdcd4 cDNA in stably transfected RT101 cells resulted in 40% fewer anchorage-independent colonies that were smaller in size than the vector control colonies, indicating that elevated Pdcd4 expression is sufficient to suppress tumor phenotype. Transient transfection of Pdcd4 expression plasmid and 4 x AP-1 reporter gene showed that activation of AP-1-dependent transcription was inhibited by Pdcd4 expression in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, Pdcd4 did not inhibit serum response element-dependent transcription, indicating specificity. In a Gal4 fusion assay, Pdcd4 specifically inhibited activation of c-Jun and c-Fos activation domains, but did not inhibit activation of JunB, JunD, Fra-1, or Fra-2. Gel mobility shift assay demonstrated that c-Jun is the major component detected in the AP-1 complex in RT101 cells. Previous studies suggested that AP-1 activity is required for maintaining the transformed phenotype in RT101 cells. Thus, Pdcd4 suppresses tumor phenotype by inhibiting AP-1-dependent transcription, possibly through inhibiting c-Jun and c-Fos activation.

Nitric oxide does not mediate but inhibits transformation and tumor phenotype.

UNLABELLED: Although inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and nitric oxide (NO) are implicated in tumor pathology, their role in the early stages of carcinogenesis is not well defined. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) induces iNOS and NO production in transformation-sensitive JB6 P+, but not in transformation-resistant JB6 P-, mouse epidermal cells. We tested the hypothesis that iNOS, by generating NO and reactive nitrogen species, mediates tumor promoter-induced transformation. Specific [N-[3-(aminomethyl)benzyl]acetamidine (1400W)] and non-specific (N(omega)-methyl-L-arginine) iNOS inhibitors significantly reduced TNFalpha-induced NO production in P+ cells but both iNOS inhibitors enhanced TNFalpha-induced anchorage-independent transformation, thus ruling out a mediator role and suggesting an inhibitor role for NO. Independent support for an inhibitor role came from the observation that the NO donor [(Z)-1-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl)amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA/NO)] inhibited TNFalpha- and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced transformation. DETA/NO treatment also suppressed tumor phenotype in tumorigenic JB6 RT101 (Tx) cells. Higher concentrations of DETA/NO induced apoptosis. The transformation inhibitory effect of lower DETA/NO concentrations may be attributable in part to inhibition by NO of NF-kappaB-dependent but not of AP-1-dependent transcription. IN CONCLUSION: (a) induction of iNOS and NO production does not mediate but actually prevents tumor promotion; (b) iNOS inhibitors enhance the transformation response, and therefore appear not to be appropriate as chemoprevention agents; and (c) NO has both chemopreventive and tumoricidal effects, suggesting promise in cancer chemoprevention and therapy.