The Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation Group of the Saudi Heart Association Recommendations Regarding Establishing a Cardiac Rehabilitation Service.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a cornerstone in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation has obtained the highest class of recommendation and the level of evidence for the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, after myocardial revascularization, with chronic coronary syndromes, and in patients with heart failure (HF). Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation should be implemented as soon as possible, be multi-phasic, and adjusted to the individual needs of the patient. CR is still suboptimally used, and many cardiac centers do not have such services (2). The provision of CR services should be based on standards and key performance indicators, and guidelines containing a minimum standard of cardiac rehabilitation utilization should be published to improve the quality of the CR program. This document presents an expert opinion that summarizes the current medical knowledge concerning the goals, target population, organization, clinical indications, and implementation methods of the CR program in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Role of left atrial speckle tracking echocardiography in predicting persistent atrial fibrillation electrical cardioversion success and sinus rhythm maintenance at 6 months.

PURPOSE: We assessed the value of left atrium speckle tracking imaging (STI) indices, and clinical and other echocardiographic parameters in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients to predict the efficacy of electrical cardioversion (EC) and sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance at 6 months. MATERIAL/METHODS: Eighty persistent AF patients planned to receive EC, underwent echocardiography including STI. After 24h, patients with successful EC were examined to predict SR maintenance. After 6 months patients with no AF recurrence in electrocardiogram (ECG) underwent 7-day ECG to exclude silent AF. Every AF>1 min was a recurrence. RESULTS: SR restored in 61 patients, 19 unsuccessful. Prior use of statins (68.8% vs. 42.1%, p=0.03) was the only factor, determined later by univariate analysis to be a significant EC success predictor (OR=1.09, CL ± 95% 1.001-1.019, p<0.03). Both groups received similar antiarrhythmics and had similar echocardiographic parameters. After 6 months, SR was maintained in 19 patients (31.1%, Group I); AF recurrences were registered in 42 patients (68.8%, Group II). In Group I, only the mitral valve deceleration time (MVDT) 224.18 ± 88.13 vs. 181.6 ± 60.6 in Group II, p=0.04) and the dispersion of time to peak longitudinal strain (dTPLS) (86.0 ± 68.3 vs. 151.8 ± 89.6, p=0.03) differed significantly. The univariate analysis revealed dTPLS as a significant predictor of SR maintenance. CONCLUSION: High EC efficacy and frequent AF recurrences were observed. The dispersion of time to the maximal longitudinal strain (LS) of left atrial segments facilitated prediction of SR maintenance. The value of 7-day ECG monitoring for detection of arrhythmia after 6 months was limited.

Speckle tracking echocardiography derived 2-dimensional myocardial strain predicts left ventricular function and mass regression in aortic stenosis patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Regression of left ventricular (LV) mass in severe aortic stenosis (AS) following aortic valve replacement (AVR) reduces the potential risk of sudden death and congestive heart failure associated with LV hypertrophy. We investigated whether abnormalities of resting LV deformation in severe AS can predict the lack of regression of LV mass following AVR. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) was performed in a total of 100 subjects including 60 consecutive patients with severe AS having normal LV ejection fraction (EF > 50 %) and 40 controls. STE was performed preoperatively and at 4 months following AVR, including longitudinal strain assessed from the apical 4-chamber and 2-chamber views and the circumferential and rotational mechanics measured from the apical short axis view. In comparison with controls, the patients with AS showed a significantly lower LV longitudinal (p < 0.001) and circumferential strain (p < 0.05) and higher apical rotation (p < 0.001). Following AVR, a significant improvement was seen in both strains (p < 0.001 for each respectively), however, apical rotation remained unchanged (p = 0.14). On multivariate analysis, baseline LV mass (odds ratio 1.02; p = 0.011), left atrial volume (odds ratio 0.81; p = 0.048) and circumferential strain (odds ratio 0.84; p = 0.02) independently predicted LV mass regression (>10 %) following AVR. In conclusion, STE can quantify the burden of myocardial dysfunction in patients with severe AS despite the presence of normal LV ejection fraction. Furthermore, resting abnormalities in circumferential strain at LV apex is related with a hemodynamic milieu associated with the lack of LV mass regression during short-term follow up after AVR.

Risk factors of asymptomatic restenosis in patients with first anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The issue of predicting coronary artery restenosis, especially silent, in patients following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been extensively studied, however, risk factors have not been fully defined. AIM: To asses the frequency of silent restenosis and its predictors in patients with anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary PCI and implantation of bare metal stents (BMS). METHODS: We recruited a cohort of 114 patients with first anterior STEMI treated with primary PCI within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms, and with the left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion (TIMI 0) and successful flow restoration (TIMI 3). A 12-lead ECG was performed before and 60 minutes after PCI. Troponin I and CK-MB were measured on admission and after six, 12 and 24 hours. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at discharge. Resting TTE and coronary angiography were performed after a six month follow-up in asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: The frequency of silent restenosis in our study group was 23.9%. The best multivariate models in logistic regression of restenosis prediction were: lower end-systolic volume of the left ventricle assessed two days after infarction longer lesion and smaller reference diameter of the stented vessel. CONCLUSIONS: Silent restenosis in patients with first anterior STEMI treated by primary PCI with the use of BMS is still frequent. The best ways to identify patients with silent restenosis at six month follow-up, apart from the lower end systolic volume in the echocardiographic study, are longer narrowing in the infarct-related artery and lower reference diameter of the treated vessel.