A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain.

To achieve more appropriate triage to the coronary care unit of patients presenting with acute chest pain, we used clinical data on 1379 patients at two hospitals to construct a simple computer protocol to predict the presence of myocardial infarction. When we tested this protocol prospectively in 4770 patients at two university hospitals and four community hospitals, the computer-derived protocol had a significantly higher specificity (74 vs. 71 percent) in predicting the absence of infarction than physicians deciding whether to admit patients to the coronary care unit, and it had a similar sensitivity in detecting the presence of infarction (88.0 vs. 87.8 percent). Decisions based solely on the computer protocol would have reduced the admission of patients without infarction to the coronary care unit by 11.5 percent without adversely affecting the admission of patients in whom emergent complications developed that required intensive care. Although this protocol should not be used to override careful clinical judgment in individual cases, the computer protocol for the most part yields accurate estimates of the probability of myocardial infarction. Decisions about admission to the coronary care unit based on the protocol would have been as effective as those actually made by the unaided physicians who cared for the patients, and less costly. Whether physicians who are aided by the protocol perform better than unaided physicians cannot be determined without further study.

Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room.

In a prospective multicenter investigation of emergency room patients with acute chest pain, physicians admitted 96% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and discharged 4%. Of 35 patients who were sent home with AMI, only 11 (31%) returned to the same hospital because of persistent symptoms. Compared with a control group of 105 randomly selected patients with AMI who were admitted from the emergency room, patients in whom AMI was missed were significantly younger, had less typical symptoms and were less likely to to have had prior AMI or angina or to have electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia or infarction not known to be old. Despite the less typical presentations of patients in whom AMI was missed, after controlling for age and sex, the short-term mortality rate was significantly higher among patients in whom AMI was missed but in whom it was detected through our follow-up procedures than in admitted AMI patients. As determined by independent reviewers, 49% of the missed AMIs could have been diagnosed through improved electrocardiographic reading skills or by admission of patients with recognized ischemic pain at rest or ischemic electrocardiographic changes not known to be old.