Serious Immune-related Adverse Events Are Associated With Greater Efficacy of Nivolumab Therapy Against Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate possible association between adverse events of nivolumab therapy and the effectiveness of treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Focusing on serious adverse events (i.e., those of grade ≥3), we evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a set of patients from the TULUNG database of NSCLC treated with nivolumab in eight oncology centers. We evaluated OS data based upon this set. To reduce possible bias, we further evaluated a subgroup of patients treated at the University Hospital in Pilsen, where the occurrence of adverse events, PFS, and ORR were independently examined by two experienced physicians. Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis. RESULTS: We observed significantly greater OS, PFS, and ORR in the group of patients experiencing adverse events upon nivolumab treatment versus in those patients without such events. Although the univariable model analyzing the data set of all patients demonstrated higher OS in patients with serious adverse events, only a nonsignificant trend was observed in the Cox multivariable model. In a subgroup of patients with PFS and ORR evaluation, we did observe significant, favorable effects for patients having had serious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Patients experiencing severe adverse events show a tendency toward better OS, PFS, and ORR compared to patients without or having only mild adverse events with nivolumab treatment.

Can Previous Chemotherapy Affect the Outcome of Nivolumab Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer?

AIM: This study compared the results of nivolumab treatment in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinomas based upon previous chemotherapeutic regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data source for this retrospective study was the Czech VILP registry of patients with nivolumab-treated adenocarcinomas in second and higher lines of treatment. In relation to objective response rate, progression-free interval, and overall survival, three comparisons of patient were made: A: Those treated in first line with cisplatin and pemetrexed versus carboplatin with paclitaxel or vinorelbine; B: treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed versus carboplatin with paclitaxel/vinorelbine and bevacizumab; and C: treatment in previous lines with pemetrexed (first-line cisplatin and pemetrexed plus those treated in second line with pemetrexed) versus treatment with taxane (first-line carboplatin and paclitaxel only plus those treated with second-line docetaxel). RESULTS: We observed no differences in objective response rate or progression-free survival between patients treated with the stated chemotherapeutic regimens. We observed a trend towards better overall survival for patients treated with carboplatin plus taxanes or vinorelbine with/without bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: From our overall survival data, a chemotherapeutic regimen of carboplatin plus taxanes or vinorelbine with/without bevacizumab might be a better partner for immunotherapy than a cisplatin and pemetrexed-based one.

Long-term Survival with Ipilimumab: Experience from a National Expanded Access Program for Patients with Melanoma.

AIM: Evaluation of efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with advanced, refractory melanoma enrolled into a national ipilimumab Expanded Access Program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with advanced/metastatic refractory melanoma were eligible for study inclusion. Ipilimumab was administered up to a total of four doses. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-six patients were analyzed. Full ipilimumab induction was administered to 66.8% of patients. Median overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 7.5 months. Median OS for patients after four doses of ipilimumab was significantly longer than for patients with fewer doses (12.3 months vs. 2.0 months respectively; p<0.001). Median OS for patients with objective tumor response was 42.3 months. Normal baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and the number of affected organs correlated with improved OS. CONCLUSION: The number of affected organs and combination of baseline LDH and CRP levels could potentially serve as predictors for both treatment response and OS.