The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation planning and procedure on acute and chronic renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Severe aortic valve stenosis inhibits renal perfusion, thereby potentially worsening renal function, in particular in elderly patients most often assigned to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Pre-TAVI diagnostics and the procedure itself may adversely impact renal function, however renal perfusion and function may also improve post-procedure. This study aimed to clarify the impact of TAVI planning and procedure on kidney function METHODS: In this retrospective study, kidney function of patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI at a tertiary university hospital between 2016 and 2019 was analyzed. The present study investigated kidney function at baseline, after computed tomography (CT) was performed for evaluation of TAVI, after TAVI, at discharge and at follow-up. RESULTS: Among 366 patients, the prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 14.5% after TAVI. Independent predictors of AKI were arterial hypertension, baseline creatinine, AKI post CT and coronary intervention during pre-procedural diagnostics. At discharge and follow-up, 2.1% and 3.4%, respectively had sustained relevant impairment of kidney function (defined as creatinine/baseline creatinine > 1.5 or renal replacement therapy). Patients with known chronic kidney disease showed no higher rates of short- and long-term impairment, but higher rates of improvement of renal function after TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: In most cases TAVI does not worsen renal function. A sustained impairment after TAVI was found in only a few cases. This was independent of reduced baseline kidney function. Transfemoral TAVI can thus be planned and performed even in patients with higher stages of chronic kidney disease.

Levosimendan in acute heart failure with severely reduced kidney function, a propensity score matched registry study.

Background: Patients with heart failure frequently present with kidney dysfunction. Kidney function is relevant, as prognosis declines with reduced kidney function and potentially beneficial drugs like levosimendan are contraindicated for missing safety data. Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective registry study was conducted including all patients receiving levosimendan on a medical intensive care unit between January 2010 and December 2019. Exclusion criteria were a follow-up less than 24 h or missing glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before administration of levosimendan. The first course of treatment was evaluated. Patients were stratified by eGFR before drug administration and the primary endpoint was a composite of supraventricular-, ventricular tachycardia and death within 7 days after administration of levosimendan. An internal control group was created by propensity score matching. Results: A total of 794 patients receiving levosimendan were screened and 368 unique patients were included. Patients were predominantly male (73.6%) and median age was 63 years. Patients were divided by eGFR into three groups: >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 110), 60-30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 130), and <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 128). ICU survival was significantly lower in patients with lower eGFR (69.1, 57.7, and 50.8%, respectively, p = 0.016) and patients with lower eGFR were significantly older and had significantly more comorbidities. The primary combined endpoint was reached in 61.8, 63.1, and 69.5% of subjects, respectively (p = 0.396). A multivariate logistic regression model suggested only age (p < 0.020), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p < 0.001) or renal replacement therapy (p = 0.028) during day 1-7 independently predict the primary endpoint while kidney function did not (p = 0.835). A propensity score matching of patients with eGFR < 30 and >30 ml/min/1.73 m2 based on these predictors of outcome confirmed the primary endpoint (p = 0.886). Conclusion: The combined endpoint of supraventricular-, ventricular tachycardia and death within 7 days was reached at a similar rate in patients independently of kidney function. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to clarify if levosimendan can be used safely in severely reduced kidney function.

Advantages of score-based delirium detection compared to a clinical delirium assessment-a retrospective, monocentric cohort study.

PURPOSE: Delirium is an underdiagnosed complication on intensive care units (ICU). We hypothesized that a score-based delirium detection using the Nudesc score identifies more patients compared to a traditional diagnosis of delirium by ICU physicians. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients treated on a general medical ICU with 30 beds in a university hospital in 2019 were analyzed. Primary outcome was a documented physician diagnosis of delirium, or a delirium score ≥2 using the Nudesc. RESULTS: In 205/943 included patients (21.7%), delirium was diagnosed by ICU physicians compared to 438/943 (46.4%; ratio 2.1) by Nudesc≥2. Both assessments were independent predictors of ICU stay (p<0.01). The physician diagnosis however was no independent predictor of mortality (OR 0.98 (0.57-1.72); p = 0.989), in contrast to the score-based diagnosis (OR 2.31 (1.30-4.10); p = 0.004). Subgroup analysis showed that physicians underdiagnosed delirium in case of hypoactive delirium and delirium in patients with female gender and in patients with an age below 60 years. CONCLUSION: Delirium in patients with hypoactive delirium, female patients and those below 60 years was underdiagnosed by physicians. The score-based delirium diagnosis detected delirium more frequently and correlated with ICU mortality and stay.

Delirium in Critically Ill Patients with and without COVID-19-A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Delirium complicating the course of Intensive care unit (ICU) therapy is a known driver of morbidity and mortality. It has been speculated that infection with the neurotrophic SARS-CoV-2 might promote delirium. METHODS: Retrospective registry analysis including all patients treated at least 48 h on a medical intensive care unit. The primary endpoint was development of delirium as diagnosed by Nursing Delirium screening scale ≥2. Results were confirmed by propensity score matching. RESULTS: 542 patients were included. The primary endpoint was reached in 352/542 (64.9%) patients, without significant differences between COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients (51.4% and 65.9%, respectively, p = 0.07) and correlated with prolonged ICU stay in both groups. In a subgroup of patients with ICU stay >10 days delirium was significantly lower in COVID-19 patients (p ≤ 0.01). After adjustment for confounders, COVID-19 correlated independently with less ICU delirium (p ≤ 0.01). In the propensity score matched cohort, patients with COVID-19 had significantly lower delirium incidence compared to the matched control patients (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: Delirium is frequent in critically ill patients with and without COVID-19 treated at an intensive care unit. Data suggests that COVID-19 itself is not a driver of delirium per se.

Incidence and predictors of delirium on the intensive care unit in patients with acute kidney injury, insight from a retrospective registry.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and delirium are common complications on the intensive care unit (ICU). Few is known about the association of AKI and delirium, as well as about incidence and predictors of delirium in patients with AKI. In this retrospective study, all patients with AKI, as defined by the KDIGO (kidney disease improving global outcome) guideline, treated for more than 24 h on the ICU in an university hospital in 2019 were included and analyzed. Delirium was defined by a NuDesc (Nursing Delirium screening scale) ≥ 2, which is evaluated three times a day in every patient on our ICU as part of daily routine. A total of 383/919 (41.7%) patients developed an AKI during the ICU stay. Delirium was detected in 230/383 (60.1%) patients with AKI. Independent predictors of delirium were: age, psychiatric disease, alcohol abuse, mechanical ventilation, severe shock, and AKI stage II/III (all p < 0.05). The primary cause of illness had no influence on the onset of delirium. Among patients with AKI, the duration of the ICU stay correlated with higher stages of AKI and the presence of delirium (stage I/no delirium: median 1.9 (interquartile range (25th-75th) 1.3-2.9) days; stage II/III/no delirium: 2.6 (1.6-5.5) days; stage I/delirium: 4.1 (2.5-14.3) days; stage II/III/delirium: 6.8 (3.5-11.9) days; all p < 0.01). Delirium, defined as NuDesc ≥ 2 is frequent in patients with AKI on an ICU and independently predicted by higher stages of AKI.

Time course of red cell volume and plasma volume over six months in compensated chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), volume overload is usually described as an expansion of plasma volume (PV). Additional red cell volume (RCV) expansion also occurs in a relevant fraction of compensated CHF patients. So far, little is known about the stability of these vascular volumes and possible volume excess in compensated CHF patients over time. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study aims at quantification of blood volume and its components, RCV and PV (raw values and adjusted for sex and anthropometric characteristics, expressed as per cent of the expected normal value), using an abbreviated carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing method (aCORM) in 14 patients (two women) with systolic CHF at baseline and at a follow-up visit after approximately 6 months. While a vast heterogeneity was observed concerning RCV (82% to 134% of normalized alues) and PV (72% to 131% of normalized values), the vascular volumes showed a mean change of 1.2% and -1.3% after a mean follow-up of 183 days. CONCLUSIONS: The vascular volumes including individual volume excess appear to be stable in compensated CHF patients. The reason for this individual volume response concerning both RCV and PV in CHF remains unclear and deserves further clarification.

Outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in Covid-19 or influenza: A single-center registry study.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is used to sustain blood oxygenation and decarboxylation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It is under debate if V-V ECMO is as appropriate for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) ARDS as it is for influenza. In this retrospective study, we analyzed all patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 or influenza A/B infection, ARDS and V-V ECMO, treated at our medical intensive care unit (ICU) between October 2010 and June 2020. Baseline and procedural characteristics as well as survival 30 days after ECMO cannulation were analyzed. A total of 62 V-V ECMO patients were included (15 with Covid-19 and 47 with influenza). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics at cannulation. Thirty days after ECMO cannulation, 13.3% of all patients with Covid-19 were discharged alive from our ICU compared to 44.7% with influenza (P = .03). Patients with Covid-19 had fewer ECMO-free days (0 (0-9.7) days vs. 13.2 (0-22.1) days; P = .05). Cumulative incidences of 30-day-survival showed no significant differences (48.6% in Covid-19 patients, 63.7% in influenza patients; P = .23). ICU treatment duration was significantly longer in ARDS patients with V-V ECMO for Covid-19 compared to influenza. Thirty-day mortality was higher in Covid-19, but not significant.

Influence of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on bleeding events after successful resuscitation and percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIM: Cardiac arrest is the most serious complication in acute coronary syndromes. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) are used in selected acute coronary syndrome patients. If the use of GPI leads to an increase in bleeding events and influences survival in patients after cardiac arrest is unknown. METHODS: We report retrospective data of a single center registry of patients after successful intra- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between 2002 and 2013. Inclusion criteria were survival for at least 6 h and successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the first 24 h. Patients treated with other fibrinolytic agents or being supported by an extracorporeal life support system were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: 310 patients were included in our study. 204 received GPI (GPI+), 106 did not (GPI-). Patients in the GPI+ group were significantly younger (62.8 vs. 68.0 years, p < 0.001) and had larger myocardial infarction sizes (maximum creatine kinase 3407 vs. 1450 U/l, p < 0.001). CPR duration, SOFA score and first lactate did not differ between the groups. Any bleeding occurred significantly more often in the GPI+ group (83.3% vs. 67.0%, p = 0.001). Decline of hemoglobin within the first 24 h was higher in the GPI+ group (-1.59 ± 1.71 mg/dl vs. -0.88 ± 1.95 mg/dl, p = 0.004), number of transfused packed red blood cells in the first 4 days, however, were similar (1.18 ± 0.40 vs. 0.90 ± 0.41 packs, p = 0.378). Survival at ICU discharge was significantly higher in the GPI+ group (77.5% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.008). The use of GPI was an independent predictor of hospital survival (OR 3.07, CI 1.31-7.20, p = 0.010). The positive effect for GPI persisted after nearest neighbor propensity score matching including 144 patients (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.48-7.21, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: After cardiac arrest, bleeding incidence was significantly higher in patients treated with GPI. Incidence of bleedings requiring transfusion, however, was similar. In this retrospective analysis, the use of GPI was an independent predictor of hospital survival. We suggest that GPI may not be withheld from cardiac arrest survivors due to potential risk of bleeding.

Development and validation of a prognostic model for survival in patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the PREDICT VA-ECMO score.

AIMS: Several scoring systems have been introduced for prognostication after initiating venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) therapy. However, static scores offer limited guidance once VA-ECMO is implanted, although continued allocation of healthcare resources is critical. Patients requiring continued VA-ECMO support are extremely unstable, with minimal heart function and multi-organ failure in most cases. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a dynamic prognostic model for patients treated with VA-ECMO. METHODS AND RESULTS: A derivation cohort included 205 all-comers undergoing VA-ECMO implantation at a tertiary referral hospital (51% received VA-ECMO during resuscitation and 43% had severe shock). Two prediction models based on point-of-care biomarkers were developed using penalised logistic regression in an elastic net approach. A validation cohort was recruited from an independent tertiary referral hospital. Comparators for the prediction of hospital survival were the SAVE score (area under the receiver operation characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.686), the SAPS score (AUC 0.679), the APACHE score (AUC 0.662) and the SOFA score (AUC 0.732) in 6-hour survivors. The 6-hour PREDICT VA-ECMO score (based on lactate, pH and standard bicarbonate concentration) outperformed the comparator scores with an AUC of 0.823. The 12-hour PREDICT VA-ECMO integrated lactate, pH and standard bicarbonate concentration at 1 hour, 6 hours and 12 hours after ECMO insertion allowed even better prognostication (AUC 0.839). Performance of the scores in the external validation cohort was good (AUCs 0.718 for the 6-hour score and 0.735 for the 12-hour score, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients requiring VA-ECMO therapy, a dynamic score using three point-of-care biomarkers predicts hospital mortality with high reliability. Furthermore, the PREDICT scores are the first scores for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients.

Isoflurane or propofol sedation in patients with targeted temperature management after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A single center study.

PROPOSE: Targeted temperature management improves outcomes in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Short lasting sedatives might enable rapid awakening after targeted temperature management and therefore early prognostication and extubation. Aim of the present study was to compare sedation with volatile isoflurane to intravenous propofol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation undergoing targeted temperature management treated between 01/2014 and 02/2017 at a single tertiary referral hospital were screened. Exclusion criteria included extracorporeal support or a survival below 48 h. RESULTS: Data on 214 patients (median age 66.1 years, 62.6% shockable rhythm, survival 69.6%) are reported, 178 patients on propofol and sufentanil and 36 patients on isoflurane and sufentanil. Median time to first spontaneous breathing (9.3 h vs. 9.5 h, p = .373), median duration on mechanical ventilation in extubated patients (99.4 h vs. 105.7 h, p = .692) and median ICU stay (11.1d vs. 9.8d, p = .320) were similar in patients on propofol or isoflurane, respectively. Findings were confirmed by propensity score matching. Opioid dose was significantly lower in the isoflurane group (p < .001) while norepinephrine dose was significantly higher (p = .004). CONCLUSION: Isoflurane sedation is feasible on during targeted temperature management. Time to spontaneous breathing, mechanical ventilation duration or ICU stay was not reduced by isoflurane.