Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 12(3): 287-290, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32273064

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of technology in the classroom has continued to grow, and with the advancement of classroom management systems and online exam software, there are opportunities to administer exams electronically. This study assessed the impact of electronic-based assessments on examination scores in a required therapeutics course. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-centered, observational study including second professional year pharmacy students enrolled in a required, one semester therapeutics course. Four assessments were administered each semester. Lecture content and exam format, a mixture of multiple-choice questions and free response written cases, did not differ significantly between years. Assessments administered during the first two years were printed on paper, while assessments administered during the third and fourth year of the study were all electronic, submitted through a classroom management system. Following institutional review board approval, the change in mean overall examination scores between paper and electronic-based assessments were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 948 students enrolled in this study, there was no difference in overall mean scores between paper and electronic-based assessments (74.8% vs. 73.8%). In addition, there was no difference in mean examination scores between overall individual paper and electronic Exam 1 through 4 or overall multiple-choice or free response scores between paper and electronic-based assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Scores did not differ between paper and electronic-based assessments. From this study, test method does not appear to impact exam results.


Subject(s)
Educational Measurement/standards , Students, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Work Performance/standards , Curriculum/standards , Curriculum/trends , Educational Measurement/methods , Educational Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Problem-Based Learning/standards , Retrospective Studies , Students, Pharmacy/psychology , Work Performance/statistics & numerical data
2.
J Pharm Technol ; 36(2): 68-71, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34752543

ABSTRACT

Background: Medication changes are common after hospitalizations, and medication reconciliations are one tool to help identify potential medication discrepancies. Objective: To determine the impact of a pharmacy-driven medication reconciliation service on number of medication discrepancies identified. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort, chart-review study conducted at an internal medicine outpatient clinic. Patients at least 18 years of age were eligible for inclusion if they presented for a hospital follow-up appointment within 14 days of discharge between September 1, 2015, and May 31, 2016, from a system hospital. The 2 cohorts were patients with a pharmacist-completed medication reconciliation note written in the electronic health record on the date of their hospital follow-up appointment and those without. The primary outcome was number of medication discrepancies identified during medication reconciliation. Secondary outcomes included types of discrepancies, 30-day hospital readmission, and 30-day emergency department visits. This study was approved by the facility institutional review board. Results: Seventy-nine patients were included, and 38 patients had a pharmacist-completed medication reconciliation (48%). A total of 64 medication discrepancies were identified in 26 patients; of these, 49 discrepancies were resolved during the appointment (77%). There was an average of 2.46 medication discrepancies (±2.34) per patient. The most common discrepancy was missing medications. Thirty-day readmission rate was 5.3% in the intervention group and 19.5% in the control group (P = .054). Conclusions: A pharmacist-completed medication reconciliation identified many medication discrepancies that were then resolved. From this study, pharmacist-led medication reconciliations following hospital discharge appear valuable.

3.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 11(11): 1159-1166, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31783963

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an individualized residency preparation program and faculty mentorship on student preparedness for pursuing residency training and their ability to successfully match with a postgraduate year one (PGY1) residency position. METHODS: This prospective cohort enrolled fourth professional year pharmacy students from August 2016 to March 2017. Students participated in a faculty-designed residency preparation program, were assigned faculty mentors, and were provided with several residency preparation resources. The primary outcome was change in the median overall perceived level of preparedness, as measured by pre- and post-residency preparation program surveys. A key secondary end point was the correlation between obtaining a PGY1 residency position and the number of residency preparation sessions attended. RESULTS: Fifty-two students participated in the residency preparation program. The median overall perceived level of preparedness increased following the preparation program. Of the 52 students participating, 37 attended over half of the program sessions. Twenty-one of the 37 (56.8%) students participating in more than half of the sessions matched with a PGY1 program compared to three out of 15 (20%) students participating in fewer than half the sessions. Additionally, students reported value in mock interviews, faculty mentorship, and institution-specific residency preparation guidance delivered via a workbook. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in an individualized residency preparation program with faculty mentorship and institution-specific guidance improves the perceived level of preparedness for students pursuing residency training. High attendance at sessions, along with other factors, may contribute to a higher rate of success.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency/methods , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Students, Pharmacy/psychology , Cohort Studies , Curriculum , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency/trends , Male , Mentors , Perception , Pharmacy Residencies/trends , Prospective Studies , Students, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 4(3): 333-40, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12215242

ABSTRACT

Cigarette smoking, like many addictive behaviors, has been shown to have a genetic component. The dopamine transporter (DAT) gene (SLC6A3) encodes a protein that regulates synaptic levels of dopamine in the brain and is a candidate gene for addictive behaviors. We have collected smoking information from a national probability sample of 3383 adult volunteers contacted via a random-digit dialing telephone interview. A subset of individuals provided DNA from cheek swabs returned via the mail for subsequent genetic analysis of self-reported smoking behavior. DNA samples were genotyped at a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism in the 3'-untranslated region of the DAT gene. If we classify smokers as non- (<100 cigarettes), former and current, we fail to replicate both Lerman et al. (Health Psychology 18:14-20, 1999) and Sabol et al. (Health Psychology 18:7-13, 1999) and support the absence of effects found by Jorm et al. (American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics) 96:331-334, 2000). When we distinguish between never-smokers (no cigarettes ever) and non-smokers (1-99 in lifetime), we find a reliable trend essentially in the opposite direction from Lerman et al. (1999), with the 10-copy allele being more frequent in never-smokers. Biobehavioral research on cigarette smoking should distinguish between never- and non-smokers. We have also developed an improved set of polymerase chain reaction conditions to increase the frequency of successful amplification of DAT'sw VNTR, which is a long, G+C-rich repeat.


Subject(s)
Membrane Glycoproteins , Minisatellite Repeats/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins , Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics , Smoking , Tobacco Use Disorder/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , DNA Primers/genetics , Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins , Female , Gene Frequency , Genotype , Humans , Male , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Regression Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...