ABSTRACT
Primary prevention aims to avert the onset of cardiovascular disease (CVD) by targeting its natural causes and risk factors; secondary prevention includes strategies and therapies that address preclinical or clinical evidence of CVD progression. The value of aspirin for primary CVD prevention is controversial because of increased bleeding, which may offset the overall modest benefits in patients with no overt CVD. In contrast, the benefits of aspirin for secondary prevention have been repeatedly and convincingly demonstrated to outweigh the risk of bleeding. Diabetes mellitus is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular events, and has been associated with an increased risk of both first and recurrent atherothrombotic events. Therefore, prevention of CVD, the major cause of mortality in patients with diabetes, is one of the most important therapeutic goals. Although the benefit of low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention of CVD is well established, its role for primary prevention remains inconclusive and controversial in diabetes patients. The benefit of aspirin for patients with CVD clearly exceeds the risk of bleeding, and even though a modest benefit has also been demonstrated in primary prevention, the trade-off for aspirin initiation against the increased risk of intracranial and gastrointestinal bleeding is more uncertain. Thus, aspirin for primary CVD prevention should be highly individualized, based on a benefit-risk ratio assessment for the given patient. In conclusion, the mere presence of diabetes is apparently not enough for aspirin to confer a benefit that clearly outweighs the risk of bleeding, and further evidence to the contrary is now needed.
