Second-line chemotherapy with 96-hour infusional paclitaxel in refractory non-small cell lung cancer: report of a phase II trial.

Advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has progressed on initial cisplatin-based chemotherapy has a poor prognosis. Although paclitaxel is an active agent in the first-line therapy of NSCLC, 24-hr infusion of paclitaxel in patients with NSCLC failing first-line cisplatin-based regimens has shown minimal activity. Prolonged infusions of paclitaxel have shown activity in breast cancer patients who have failed short infusions of paclitaxel. In this study, 13 patients with refractory NSCLC who progressed on or after initial chemotherapy were treated with 96-hr paclitaxel (140 mg/m2 over 96 hr every 3 weeks) infusions as outpatients using a CADD infusion pump via a central catheter. Nine patients received only one or two cycles of treatment because of disease progression and had a median survival of 3 months (range, 1-5 months). Four patients had stabilization of disease for two to six cycles of treatment and had a median survival of 8 months (range, 8-12+ months). Grade 3-4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity occurred in < 10% of cycles, and no treatment-related hospitalizations occurred. Quality of life (QOL) assessments using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire were performed at baseline and with each treatment cycle. In conclusion, although no objective responses were seen, disease stabilization occurred in 31% of patients. Overall toxicity was tolerable with no major negative impact on QOL in those patients receiving two or more cycles of treatment.

Phase I trial of a 96 h paclitaxel infusion with filgrastim support in refractory solid tumor patients.

A phase I study of a 96 h paclitaxel infusion with filgrastim support was performed to determine the toxicity, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics in patients with refractory solid tumors. In this phase I trial, the initial paclitaxel dose was 140 mg/m2/96 h followed by filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day s.c.) beginning 24 h after the paclitaxel and continued until granulocyte recovery. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients with refractory solid tumors were eligible; however, only one previous chemotherapy regimen was allowed. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated by 20 mg/m2/96 h in subsequent cohorts until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by quantitating paclitaxel concentrations at baseline, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after the start of the paclitaxel infusion. Twenty-one patients were entered into this trial of which 19 were evaluable. A total of 52 treatment cycles were administered. DLT was seen in two of four patients at 200 mg/m2/96 h, and consisted of diarrhea, mucositis and granulocytopenic infection. The MTD of the 96 h paclitaxel infusion was 180 mg/m2 with filgrastim support. Mucosal and granulocyte toxicity were correlated with steady-state paclitaxel concentrations (Css) greater than 0.100 micromol/l. In the presence of liver function test 1.5 times or lower than normal, metastatic liver disease did not alter paclitaxel Css. Objective responses were observed in non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer and melanoma. The recommended phase II dose of paclitaxel infused over 96 h with filgrastim support is 180 mg/m2. Paclitaxel Css correlate with mucosal and granulocyte toxicity. In the presence of normal enzymatic function, metastatic liver disease does not affect paclitaxel clearance.

Induction therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel and dose-escalating conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary report of a phase I trial.

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is optimally managed with chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation, although the most appropriate strategy is not yet defined. In this phase I trial, we use two 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (225 mg/m2 over 3 hours) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 6) followed by concurrent weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2/wk x 6) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 2/wk x 6) and thoracic irradiation. Patients undergo three-dimensional treatment planning (conformal radiotherapy) to define the cancer target volume precisely. The phase I question being addressed in this study is the maximum tolerated radiation dose given concurrently with low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin. The initial radiation dose is 60 Gy, with dose escalations to 66 Gy, 70 Gy, and 74 Gy being planned. Ten patients have been entered thus far (eight men and two women). Their median age is 67 years (range, 59 to 78 years), and none of the patients has had greater than 5% pretreatment weight loss. Seven of 10 are evaluable for response to induction carboplatin and paclitaxel, with a response rate of 57% (three partial responses and one minor response). Three patients had stable disease and none of the patients had evidence of progressive disease during induction chemotherapy. Three patients have completed all treatment at 60 Gy and one has completed all treatment at 66 Gy. Three of the four patients have had partial responses (75%), with the remaining patient having stable disease. Toxicity in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy portion of the trial thus far has consisted of grade 3 neutropenia in one patient and grade 4 lymphocytopenia in all four patients. No grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity has been seen. The trial data are not yet mature enough to report on survival. Accrual and treatment is continuing at the 66 Gy radiation dose level.

A clinical and pharmacokinetic study of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and peripheral blood stem cells in patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer.

We have developed a regimen incorporating multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin and fixed-dose paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and peripheral blood stem cell support given every 21 days for up to four cycles. Our phase I study of this regimen has treated 26 patients with good performance status and histologically documented unresectable or metastatic carcinoma, sarcoma, or melanoma, 21 of whom received all planned courses every 21 days. Paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 was infused over 24 hours, followed by a 1-hour carboplatin infusion, with doses escalated between area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) targets of 8 and 20. Considering the carboplatin doses administered (two to three times those generally achieved with growth factor support), toxicity has been relatively modest. The median duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was not significantly different between the AUCs of 8 and 18, which proved to be the maximum tolerated carboplatin dose. Twelve courses were associated with hospitalization for neutropenic fever or catheter-related thrombophlebitis. One treatment-related death occurred, and severe toxicity caused withdrawal of two patients treated at the AUC of 20. Peripheral neuropathy was the most common serious nonhematologic complication. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed significantly lower measured versus predicted AUC values. Among 25 evaluable patients, preliminary results show one complete response (ovarian cancer) and 11 partial responses, including four in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Additional issues to be addressed include the effect of a shorter (or longer) paclitaxel infusion on the carboplatin AUC (and the incidence of toxicity) and whether the discrepancy between actual and predicted AUCs (greater in our study than reported elsewhere) is due to the variability of creatinine clearance-determined glomerular filtration rate or to altered carboplatin pharmacokinetics when a short high-dose infusion follows paclitaxel. Additional patients are being accrued at the AUC of 18.

A phase I trial of alpha-interferon in combination with pentostatin in hematologic malignancies.

Pentostatin, a novel inhibitor of adenosine deaminase, has shown activity in various lymphoid malignancies of both the T and B cell lineage. This agent has unique side effects and in general myelosuppression has been mild. Interferon has both antiviral and antineoplastic properties. This agent has shown activity in hairy cell leukemia, chronic granulocytic leukemia, low grade lymphoma, and myeloma. Side effects from interferon are in general dissimilar to those that have been seen with pentostatin and in particular myelosuppression has not been a major toxicity with low doses of interferon. This current trial explored the combination of pentostatin and interferon in hematologic malignancies. Fifteen patients were enrolled in this phase I trial at a fixed dose of pentostatin of 4 mg/m2 biweekly and interferon at doses of 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 million units/m2 of interferon. At the first three dose levels of interferon nausea and vomiting were the predominant toxicity and appeared to worsen with time on study. Fatigue also was seen at the lowest level of interferon and was severe enough to cause two individuals to discontinue the study medications. At higher dose levels of interferon, myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, and fatigue were the predominant toxicities. One patient with hairy cell leukemia had a complete response and a second patient with T cell cutaneous lymphoma had a partial response which lasted for 6 to 7 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose of interferon with pentostatin in this patient population was four million units/m2.