Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 26(6 Suppl): 14-8, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21550764

ABSTRACT

The ASR (articular surface replacement) XL (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty offers the advantage of stability and increased motion. However, an alarming number of early failures prompted the evaluation of patients treated with this system. A prospective study of patients who underwent arthroplasty with the ASR XL system was performed. Patients with 2-year follow-up or any revision were included. Failure rates, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and radiographs were evaluated. Ninety-five patients (105 hips) were included. There were 16 revisions. Thirteen (12%) were aseptic acetabular failures. Eight were revised for aseptic loosening; 4, for metallosis; 1, for malposition; 2, for infection; and 1, for periprosthetic fracture. Mean time to revision was 1.6 years (0.18-3.4 years). The ASR XL with a revision rate of 12% is the second reported 1 piece metal-on-metal system with a significant failure rate at early follow-up. This particular class of implants has inherent design flaws that lead to early failure.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation , Hip Joint/surgery , Hip Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Prosthesis Failure , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Bone Malalignment/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Incidence , Male , Metals , Middle Aged , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Radiography , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...