ABSTRACT
A series of modified, hafnium tert-butoxide ([Hf(OBu(t))4]) compounds (1-26) were crystallographically characterized, and representative species were then used to produce HfO2nanoparticles. This systematically varied family of [Hf(OR)4] compounds was developed from the reaction of [Hf(OBu(t))4] with a series of (i) Lewis basic solvents, tetrahydrofuran, pyridine, or 1-methylimidazole; (ii) simple phenols, HOC6H4(R)-2 or HOC6H3(R)2-2,6 where R = CH3, CH(CH3)2, or C(CH3)3; and (iii) complex polydentate alcohols, tetrahydrofuran methanol (H-OTHF), pyridinecarbinol (H-OPy), and tris(hydroxymethylethane) (THME-H3). The solvent-modified products were crystallographically characterized as [Hf(OBu(t))4(solv)n] (1-3). The phenoxide (OAr)-exchanged [Hf(OBu(t))4] products isolated from toluene were characterized as dimeric [Hf(OAr)n(OBu(t))4-n]2 (4 and 5) or [Hf(µ-OH)(OAr)3(HOBu(t))]2 (6 and 7) for the less sterically demanding OAr ligands and [Hf(OAr)n(OBu(t))4-n(HOBu(t))] (8 and 9) monomers for the larger OAr ligands. When Lewis basic solvents were employed, solvated monomers of varied OAr substitutions were observed as [Hf(OAr)n(OBu(t))4-n(solv)x], where solv = THF (10, 11, and 13-15) and py (16 and 19-21). The nuclearities of the remaining complex polydentate alcohol derivatives ranged from monomers (24, OPy) to dimers (22, OTHF; 23, OPy) to tetramers (25 and 26, THME). On the basis of their nuclearities, select members of this family of [Hf(OR)4] compounds (monomer, [Hf(OBu(t))4], 8; dimer, 19a, 22; tetramer, 25) were used to determine the validity of using [Hf(OR)4] precursors for the production of hafnia (HfO2) nanoparticles under solvothermal (oleylamine/oleic acid) conditions. After a 650 °C thermal treatment, the resulting powder X-ray diffraction pattern for each powder was found to be consistent with HfO2 (PDF 00-040-1173), and after a 1000 °C treatment, larger particles of HfO2 (PDF 00-043-1017) were reported. Transmission electron microscopy images confirmed that nanomaterials had formed. Because identical processing conditions had been employed for each HfO2 nanomaterial, the morphological variations observed in this study may be attributed to the individual precursors ("precursor structure affect").
ABSTRACT
The coordination behavior of a set of (ethylenedioxy)diethanamine-based tetraphenol ligands with a series of Group 4 metal alkoxides ([M(OR)(4)]) was determined. The ligands were synthesized from a modified Mannich reaction and fully characterized as N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(3,5-tert-butyl-benzyl-2-hydroxy)-2,2'-(ethylenedioxy)diethanamine, termed H(4)-OEA-DBP(4) (1), and N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(3,5-chloro-benzyl-2-hydroxy)-2,2'-(ethylenedioxy)diethanamine, termed H(4)-OEA-DCP(4) (2). The reaction of 1 with a set of [M(OR)(4)] [M = Ti, Zr, or Hf; OR = iso-propoxide (OPr(i)), neo-pentoxide (ONep), or tert-butoxide (OBu(t))] precursors led to the isolation of [(OPr(i))(2)Ti](2)(µ-OEA-DBP(4)) (3), [(ONep)(2)Ti](2)(µ-OEA-DBP(4)) (4), and [(OBu(t))(2)M](2)(µ-OEA-DBP(4)) where M = Ti (5), Zr (6), or Hf (7). In addition, the [(ONep)(2)Ti](2)(µ-OEA-DCP(4)) (4a) derivative was isolated from the reaction of 2 and [Ti(ONep)(4)], demonstrating the similarity of coordination behavior between the two OEA-R(4) ligands. For 3-7, the metal center adopts a slightly distorted octahedral geometry by binding the two O atoms of the phenoxide moiety, as well as one N and one O atom from the OEA moieties, while retaining two of the original OR ligands. Solution NMR demonstrates inequivalent protons for the majority of the bound OEA ligands, which argues for retention of structure in solution. The synthesis and characterization of these compounds are presented in detail.
ABSTRACT
A series of tin(II) amide alkoxides ([(OR)Sn(NMe(2))](n)) and tin(II) alkoxides ([Sn(OR)(2)](n)) were investigated as precursors for the production of tin oxide (SnO(x)) nanowires. The precursors were synthesized from the metathesis of tin dimethylamide ([Sn(NMe(2))(2)](2)) and a series of aryl alcohols {H-OAr = H-OC(6)H(4)(R)-2: R = CH(3) (H-oMP), CH(CH(3))(2) (H-oPP), C(CH(3))(3) (H-oBP)] or [H-OC(6)H(3)(R)(2)-2,6: R = CH(3) (H-DMP), CH(CH(3))(2) (H-DIP), C(CH(3))(3) (H-DBP)]}. The 1:1 products were all identified as the dinuclear species [(OAr)Sn(µ-NMe(2))](2) where OAr = oMP (1), oPP (2), oBP (3), DMP (4), DIP (5), DBP (6). The 1:2 products were identified as either a polymer ([Sn(µ-OAr)(2)](∞) (where OAr = oMP (7), oPP (8)), dinuclear [(OAr)Sn(µ-OAr)](2) (where OAr = oBP (9), DMP (10) or DIP/HNMe(2) (11)), or mononuclear [Sn(DBP)(2)] (12) complexes. These novel families of compounds (heteroleptic 1-6, and homoleptic 7-12) were evaluated for the production of SnO(x) nanowires using solution precipitation (SPPT; oleylamine/octadecene solvent system) or electrospinning (ES; THF solvent) processing conditions. The SPPT route that employed the heteroleptic precursors yielded mixed phases of Sn(o):romarchite [1 (100:0); 2 (80:20); 3 (68:32); 4 (86:14); 5 (66:35); 6 (88:12)], with a variety of spherical sized particles [1 (350-900 nm); 2 (150-1200 nm); 3 (250-950 nm); 4 (20-180 nm); 5 (80-400 nm); 6 (40-200 nm)]. For the homoleptic precursors, similar phased [7 (80:20); 8 (23:77); 9 (15:85); 10 (34:66); 11 (77:23); 12 (77:23)] spherical nanodots were isolated [7 (50-300 nm); 8: (irregular); 10 (200-800 nm); 11 (50-150 nm); 12 (50-450 nm)], except for 9 which formed polycrystalline rods [Sn(o):romarchite (15:85)] with aspect ratios >100. From ES routes, the heteroleptic species were found to form 'tadpole-shaped' materials whereas the homoleptic species formed electrosprayed nanodots. The one exception noted was for 7, where, without use of a polymer matrix, nanowires of Sn(o), decorated with micron sized 'balls' were observed. Due to the small amount of material generated, PXRD patterns were inconclusive to the identity of the generated material; however, cyclic voltammetry on select samples was used to tentatively identify the final Sn(o) (from 7) with the other sample identified as SnO(x) (from 1).
ABSTRACT
A family of cesium aryloxides [Cs(OAr)](n) were synthesized and structurally characterized from the reaction of 1:1 or 1:excess stoichiometry of Cs(0) and the appropriate alkyl-substituted phenol: 2-alkylphenol [alkyl = methyl (H-oMP), isopropyl (H-oPP), and tert-butyl (H-oBP)] and 2,6-dialkylphenol [alkyl = methyl (H-DMP), isopropyl (H-DIP), tert-butyl (H-DBP), and phenyl (H-DPhP)]. The products were structurally identified as [Cs(oMP)(H-oMP)(2)](n) (1), [Cs(5)(oPP)(5)](n) (2), [Cs(4)(oBP)(4)(H-oBP)(6)](n) (3x, shown), [Cs(3)(DMP)(3)](n) (4), [Cs(2)(DIP)(2)](n) (5), [Cs(DIP)(H-DIP)](n) (5x), and [Cs(DPhP)](n) (7). Compounds 1-7 were found to adopt complex polymeric structures employing π interactions from the neighboring pendant phenoxide ligands. The solution behavior of these compounds was studied using solution (133)Cs NMR spectroscopy, and for each compound, a single (133)Cs NMR resonance was observed, with chemical shift values found to be strongly solvent-dependent. This implies that monomeric cesium salt species involving solvent interactions exist in solution.
