Learning from women: Improving experiences of respectful maternity care during unplanned caesarean birth for women with diverse ethnicity and racial backgrounds.

PROBLEM: Women from diverse ethnicity and racial backgrounds have few opportunities to share birth experiences to inform improvements in care. BACKGROUND: Respectful maternity care is recognised as a global women's health priority. Integrating that framework into diverse care systems and models may help bridge care gaps for women who had unexpected birth experiences, including unplanned caesarean birth. AIM: To describe the experiences of women who had unplanned caesarean births and use knowledge gained to inform best practice recommendations that embody respectful maternity care. METHODS: Qualitative data were analysed from focus groups involving a convenience sample of 11 English speaking women, from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds, with prior unplanned caesarean experience. Respectful maternity care was used as the lens for interpreting women's narratives using Thorne's interpretive description. The study site was an outpatient prenatal clinic within an urban academic, tertiary-care medical centre in the United States. FINDINGS: Two predominant, contrasting themes emerged: "not feeling well cared for" and "feeling well supported". Positive experiences included sources of support and strength from the midwifery practice, group prenatal care, and a doula program. Eight domains of respectful maternity care were applied to findings, highlighting current positive institutional practices and proposing areas for future quality improvement. CONCLUSION: Key practices promoting respectful maternity care include adequate communication and information sharing between pregnancy care providers and women, and a more robust informed consent process. Further emphasis on respectful maternity care is needed to support women to make shared decisions that best fit their circumstances and preferences.

Promoting Shared Decision Making About Birth After Cesarean in Haitian Women.

This was a pilot to develop culturally appropriate group counseling sessions for shared decision making about modes of birth after cesarean for Haitian Creole speakers. The curriculum was created by incorporating information identified by women and their providers in focus groups through the lens of Health Belief Model. Ten women attended a session. There was a 50% increase in women planning to labor after cesarean; nine stated the session gave them confidence to decide about their mode of birth; all were "very satisfied" with the session and would recommend it to others. The session was accepted as a method to improve women's decision making, feasible, effective, and could be integrated to improve shared decision making discussions for other non-English speaking women.

Pap Smear and Mammogram Screening Rates in a Refugee and General OB/GYN Clinic: A Retrospective Review.

Although multiple studies have shown that resettled refugee women are less likely to receive preventative cancer screenings like pap smears and mammograms, a small number have demonstrated the opposite. This retrospective chart review, conducted between January 2017 and October 2018, compares pap smear and mammogram rates of patients seen in a refugee-specific OB/GYN clinic with patients from the general OB/GYN clinic at the same institution. Data from 298 patients (149 refugee and 149 general clinic patients matched by age and date-of-visit) were analyzed. Pap smear screening rates were 90.60% in the refugee group and 73.83% in the general group [p < 0.009, aOR 3.46 (1.36-8.81)], while mammogram screening rates were 36.84% and 38.60%, respectively (p = 0.46). The provision of holistic services meeting refugee women's unique needs can effectively increase pap smear screening rates.

Listening to Haitian Women and their Health Care Providers: Insight into Shared Decision-making After Cesarean Section.

INTRODUCTION: Haitian women in Massachusetts have high rates of cesarean section and low rates of vaginal birth after cesarean, despite evidence suggesting that many are eligible to attempt vaginal birth after a previous cesarean. This qualitative study explored the cultural impact of previous surgical birth for Haitian women to inform the development of a patient-centered decision support program. METHODS: Key stakeholders included Haitian women with previous cesarean and their obstetric care providers. Haitian women participated in focus groups; care providers participated in focus groups and in-depth interviewing. RESULTS: Four prominent themes emerged surrounding childbirth decision-making: the importance of Haitian culture and beliefs; need for more information on birthing options; influence of family/friends; and pain as a considerable factor. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that group counseling tailored to meet cultural values and needs of Haitian women may support all stakeholders as they work towards sharing decisions about birth after cesarean.

The Perspectives of Women and Their Health-Care Providers Regarding Using an ECA to Support Mode of Birth Decisions.

This study used focus groups to assess the feasibility and acceptability of adapting an Embodied Conversational Agent (ECA) to support decision-making about mode of birth after previous cesarean. Twelve women with previous cesareans, and eight prenatal providers at an academic, tertiary-care medical center, viewed a prototype ECA and were asked to share feedback on the potential role in helping women prepare for decision-making. Both groups felt that although it was somewhat "robot-like," the ECA could provide easy access to information for patients and could augment the visit with providers. Future work is needed to improve ECA visual appeal and clarify the role and timing for utilization of decision aids using ECA technology to enhance the shared decision-making process.

A Shared Decision-Making Toolkit for Mode of Birth After Cesarean.

This study evaluated a shared decision-making (SDM) Toolkit (decision aid, counseling guide, and provider scripts) designed to prepare and engage racially diverse women in shared decision-making discussions about the mode of birth after cesarean. The pilot study, involving 27 pregnant women and 63 prenatal providers, assessed women's knowledge, preferences, and satisfaction with decision making, as well as provider perspectives on the Toolkit's acceptability. Most women experienced knowledge improvement, felt more in control and that providers listened to their concerns and supported them. Providers reported that the Toolkit helped women understand their options and supported their counseling. The SDM Toolkit could be used to help women and providers improve their SDM regarding mode of birth after cesarean.

Neonatal Omphalitis After Lotus Birth.

Lotus birth, or umbilical nonseverance, is the practice wherein the umbilical cord is not separated from the placenta after birth, but allowed instead to dry and fall off on its own. Lotus birth may result in neonatal omphalitis. This article describes the history and rationale for lotus birth as well as the etiology, incidence, clinical presentation, and management of neonatal omphalitis. Recommendations for educating families how to perform lotus birth safely are presented. Additionally, signs and symptoms that warrant newborn assessment and treatment are reviewed.

Rides for Refugees: A Transportation Assistance Pilot for Women's Health.

Transportation barriers can limit access to healthcare for refugee and asylum seeking women. This study assesses the efficacy of a healthcare-directed rideshare application for overcoming these barriers at an urban health clinic. A pilot study was conducted at Boston Medical Center's Refugee Women's Health Clinic from June 2018 to February 2019. Women with gynecologic visits reporting transportation difficulties were offered rides. The primary outcome was no-show rates. Secondary outcomes included cost, and patient/provider experiences. Of 102 eligible visits, 31 reported transportation insecurity and received rides. Those women had a 6% no-show rate, compared to 30% in women denying transportation barriers, and 50% amongst unreachable women (p < 0.0001). The intervention cost $2033 and generated $30,337 in charges. Minimal adverse experiences were reported. Healthcare-directed rideshare applications are an effective and cost-efficient strategy for refugee and asylum seeking women to access essential health services.