[Need of periodontal treatment evaluated with CPITN and its relation to the quality of the cervical margin of restorations]. / Necessidade de tratamento periodontal avaliada pelo CPITN e sua relação com a qualidade de acabamento cervical das restaurações.

Irregularities of the cervical margin of restorations facilitate the retention of bacterial plaque, hindering plaque control through the habitual procedures of oral hygiene and favoring the development of periodontal disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the periodontal condition and treatment needs (applying CPITN) in relation to the cervical margin of dental restorations. Three hundred and sixty-seven teeth with class II and V cavities restored with amalgam, class III cavities restored with composite resin, cast metal restorations and unitary prostheses were examined. With a WHO periodontal probe, the position of the cervical margins of restorations was verified (supragingival, subgingival or at the gingival margin level); the presence of defects (lack or excess of restoring material) and the presence of score 2 of CPITN were also assessed. After the analysis of the data, it was possible to conclude that: 1) supragingival margins offered the best marginal adaptation and the lowest frequency of score 2; 2) both the lack and the excess of restoring material favor the development of score 2, despite the utilized material and 3) in subgingival margins, incorrect marginal adaptation was the most frequent event, mainly due to excess of restoring material, and in these cases there was higher frequency of score 2 of CPITN.

Absorbable versus nonabsorbable membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs: a histometric investigation.

The purpose of this study was to histometrically evaluate an absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) and a nonabsorbable polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (PTFE), associated with or without bone grafts, regarding "re-osseointegration" after treating ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs. All mandibular premolars were removed from five 2-year-old mongrel dogs. After 3 months of healing, 3 titanium implants were placed on each side of the mandible. Experimental peri-implantitis was induced with ligatures after abutment connection. Ligatures and abutments were removed after 1 month and the bone defects were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments; debridement alone (DB), debridement plus PTFE membrane associated with mineralized bone graft (Bio-Oss) (GBR+BG-I), debridement plus collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) associated with mineralized bone graft (GBR+BG-II), debridement plus PTFE membrane (GBR-I), debridement plus collagen membrane (GBR-II), or debridement plus mineralized-bone graft (BG). The dogs were sacrificed after 5 months. Data analysis did not reveal significant differences among the treatments regarding the percentage of bone-to-implant contact ("re-osseointegration") within the limits of the threads of the implant (P = .997). Thus, in the treatment of peri-implantitis, debridement alone as well as grafting alone had the same effect as did either membrane.

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of ligature-induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis in dogs.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the attachment loss around teeth and implants by clinical and microbiological analysis. The mandibular premolars were extracted in 5 mongrel dogs and, 3 months later, two titanium implants were installed on each side of the mandible and, after another 3 months, abutment connection was performed. Plaque control in the implants and maxillary premolars was maintained for two weeks prior to the start of the main experiment. On day 0 and 30 days after ligature placement, microbiological samples were obtained and relative attachment level was measured for the teeth and implants. The presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction technique on day 0 and 30 days after ligature placement. None of the above bacteria were detected on day 0. Thirty days after ligature placement, P. gingivalis was present in 95% and 85% and B. forsythus was present in 80% and 85% of the implants and teeth sites, respectively. Statistical analysis (one-way RM-ANOVA) showed a significant difference (P<0.01) between pre- and post-induction measurements around teeth and implants. However, there was no significant difference (P=0.41) in the rate of attachment loss, between periodontitis and peri-implantitis. It can be concluded that: (1) P. gingivalis and B. forsythus were strongly associated with induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis, and (2) induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis presented a similar rate of attachment loss.

Clinical study of guided bone regeneration and/or bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs.

This study evaluated, by clinical analysis, the hard tissue response following treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in 5 dogs. The mandibular premolars were removed from both sides of the jaw. After 3 months of healing, two titanium implants were placed on each side of the mandible. Following abutment connection, 3 months later, experimental peri-implantitis was induced by the placement of cotton ligatures in a submarginal position. Ligatures and abutments were removed after one month and the bony defects were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: debridement (DE), debridement plus guided bone regeneration (GBR), debridement plus mineralized bone graft (BG) and debridement plus guided bone regeneration associated with mineralized bone graft (GBR + BG). The peri-implant bone defects were clinically measured before and 5 months post-treatment. Results showed a higher percentage of vertical bone fill for GBR + BG (27.77 +/- 14.07) followed by GBR (21.78 +/- 16.19), BG (21.26 +/- 6.87), DE (14.03 +/- 5.6). However, there were no statistically significant differences between any of the treatments proposed (one way repeated measures analysis of variance, P = 0.265).

Absorbable versus nonabsorbable membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs. Part I. A clinical investigation.

The purpose of this study was to clinically evaluate an absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) and a nonabsorbable polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (PTFE), associated or not with bone grafts, for the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs. The bilateral mandibular premolars were removed from 5 2-year-old mongrel dogs. After 3 months of healing, 3 titanium implants were placed on each side of the mandible. Experimental peri-implantitis was induced after abutment connection. Ligatures and abutments were removed after 1 month and the bone defects were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: DB: debridement alone; GBR+BG-I: debridement plus PTFE membrane associated with mineralized bone graft (Bio-Oss); GBR+BG-II: debridement plus collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) associated with mineralized bone graft; GBR-I: debridement plus PTFE membrane; GBR-II: debridement plus collagen membrane; BG: debridement plus mineralized bone graft. The peri-implant bone defects were measured before and 5 months after treatment. Results showed the greatest percentage of vertical bone fill for GBR+BG-II (27.77+/-14.07) followed by GBR-II (21.78+/-16.19), BG (21.26+/-6.87), GBR+BG-I (19.57+/-13.36), GBR-I (18.86+/-10.63) and DB (14.03+/-5.6). However, the values were not statistically significant (ANOVA, contrast F test, P=0.612). Within the limits of the present investigation, it can be concluded that no difference was detected among treatments.

Treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects by regenerative procedures. Part II: A histometric study in dogs.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, by histometric analysis, re-osseointegration following treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis in dogs. Five dogs were used in this study. Their mandibular premolars (P2, P3 and P4) were first removed. After 3 additional months of healing, two titanium implants were placed on each side of the mandible. After 3 months, the abutment connection was performed and experimental peri-implantitis was induced by placing cotton ligatures in a submarginal position. Ligatures and abutments were removed after one month and the peri-implant bone defects were randomly assigned to one of the treatments: debridement, debridement plus guided-bone regeneration, debridement plus mineralized-bone graft, and debridement plus guided-bone regeneration associated with mineralized-bone graft. Five months post-treatment, the degree of bone contact with the implant surface and the bone area within the threads were measured in 12 threads, the 6 most coronal at each side of each implant. One-way analysis of variance did not reveal statistically significant differences between the treatment modalities (p > 0.05). Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that there is a limited possibility of re-osseointegration around implant surfaces previously exposed by ligature-induced peri-implantitis.

Histometric evaluation of bone regeneration around immediate implants partially in contact with bone: a pilot study in dogs.

Bone regeneration was evaluated around immediate implants partially in contact with bone, with or without the concurrent application of a combination of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1). Mandibular premolars were removed, and the implant osteotomies were prepared; a uniform circumferential gap was prepared 1.25 mm beyond the width of the implant bed in the coronal half. Twelve implants (8.5 x 3.75 mm) were inserted in six dogs. Before insertion, an implant received a single application of 5 micrograms/mL of PDGF and IGF-1 delivered in 0.10 mL of 4% methylcellulose gel or 0.10 mL of 4% methylcellulose gel only as a control. To label regenerated bone, a 2% calcein green solution was administered by intramuscular injection at 0, 7, 15, 30, and 45 days after implant insertion Three and 8 weeks after implant insertion undecalcified sections were obtained, and the degree of bone to implant contact, the bone area, and the intensity of bone labeling were measured into the limits of the eight most coronal threads of the implant (four threads on each side of each implant). The results showed a greater extension of bone-to-implant contact, a larger percentage of bone area, and greater intensity of bone labeling for test versus control implants (P < .01). Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that the combination of PDGF/IGF-1 might be an alternative for enhancing bone healing around implants partially in contact with bone.

Evaluation of guided bone regeneration and/or bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects: a morphometric study in dogs.

The goal of this study was to evaluate, morphometrically, hard-tissue healing following the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs and guided bone regeneration and/or bone grafts. Five dogs were used, and the mandibular premolars were removed. Three months later, two titanium implants were installed on each side of the mandible, and after another 3 months, abutment connection was performed. Following abutment connection, experimental periimplantitis was induced by placing cotton ligatures in a submarginal position. Ligatures and abutments were removed after 1 month and the bony defects were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: debridement (DE), debridement plus guided bone regeneration (GBR), debridement plus mineralized bone graft (BG), and debridement plus guided bone regeneration associated with mineralized bone graft (GBR/BG). The dogs were euthanatized after 5 months. Morphometric analysis did not reveal significant differences among the treatments neither with respect to the percentage of bone to implant contact (p = 0.996) nor to the bone area (p = 0.946) within the limits of the threads of the implant. Within the limits of this investigation, there is insufficient evidence to indicate that any of the treatments presented an improved response in dealing with bony defects resulting from peri-implantitis.

Platelet-derived growth factor/insulin-like growth factor-1 combination and bone regeneration around implants placed into extraction sockets: a histometric study in dogs.

This study evaluated, by histometric analysis, the wound healing process of bone around implants placed into extraction sockets with or without the concurrent application of a combination of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1). Mandibular premolars were removed, and 32 implants were inserted in eight dogs. Before insertion, two implants received a single application of 5 micrograms/mL of PDGF and IGF-1 delivered in 0.10 mL of 4% methylcellulose gel or 0.10 mL of 4% methylcellulose gel only as a control. To label regenerated bone, a 2% calcein green solution was administered by intramuscular injection at 0, 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75 days after implant insertion. Three, 8, and 12 weeks after implant insertion, undecalcified sections were obtained, and the degree of bone contact with the implant surface, the bone area, and the intensity of bone labeling were measured into the limits of the threads of the implant. Greater extension of bone/implant contact (paired t test, P < .05) was observed in test (22.4% +/- 13.7%) than in control (17.2% +/- 13.6%) implants at 3 weeks. One-way ANOVA revealed a higher intensity of bone labeling (P < .05) at 3 weeks than at 12 weeks (127.8 +/- 42.59 and 56.7 +/- 26.34, gray scale values) for test implants. Within the limits of the present study, it was concluded that the combination of PDGF/IGF-I actively took part in the initial phase of bone repair.

Treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects by regenerative procedures: a clinical study in dogs.

We carried out a clinical evaluation of the hard tissue fill following treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis in dogs. Four dogs were used and their mandibular premolars (P2, P3 and P4) were removed. After 3 months of healing, two titanium implants were placed on each side of the mandible. After 3 months, the abutment connection was performed, and experimental peri-implantitis was induced by placement of cotton ligatures in a submarginal position. The ligatures and abutments were removed after one month, and the peri-implant bone defects were assigned randomly to one of the treatments: debridement (control), debridement plus guided bone regeneration (GBR), debridement plus mineralized bone graft (BG), and debridement plus guided bone regeneration associated with a mineralized bone graft (GBR + BG). Clinical measurements of the peri-implant bone defects before and 5 months after treatment revealed no statistically significant differences between the defects treated by GBR, BG and GBR + BG. These 3 treatment methods provided more hard tissue fill than debridement alone (p < 0.05). Thus, it can be concluded that GBR, BG or a combination of the two techniques can enhance the hard tissue fill in defects caused by peri-implantitis in dogs.