The enteroendocrine axis and its effect on gastrointestinal function, nutrition, and inflammation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction limits enteral nutrition (EN) delivery in critical illness and contributes to systemic inflammation. The enteroendocrine (EE) axis plays an integral role in this interface between nutrition, inflammation, and GI function in critical illness. In this review, we present an overview of the EE system with a focus on its role in GI inflammation and function. RECENT FINDINGS: Enteroendocrine cells have been primarily described in their role in macronutrient digestion and absorption. Recent research has expanded on the diverse functions of EE cells including their ability to sense microbial peptides and metabolites and regulate immune function and inflammation. Therefore, EE cells may be both affected by and contribute to many pathophysiologic states and interventions of critical illness such as dysbiosis , inflammation, and alternative EN strategies. In this review, we present an overview of EE cells including their growing role in nonnutrient functions and integrate this understanding into relevant aspects of critical illness with a focus on EN. SUMMARY: The EE system is key in maintaining GI homeostasis in critical illness, and how it is impacted and contributes to outcomes in the setting of dysbiosis , inflammation and different feeding strategies in critical illness should be considered.

Gut adaptation after gastric bypass in humans reveals metabolically significant shift in fuel metabolism.

OBJECTIVE: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) is among the most effective therapies for obesity and type 2 diabetes, and intestinal adaptation is a proposed mechanism for these effects. It was hypothesized that intestinal adaptation precedes and relates to metabolic improvement in humans after RYGB. METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal, first-in-human study of gene expression (GE) in the "Roux limb" (RL) collected surgically/endoscopically from 19 patients with and without diabetes. GE was determined by microarray across six postoperative months, including at an early postoperative (1 month ± 15 days) time point. RESULTS: RL GE demonstrated tissue remodeling and metabolic reprogramming, including increased glucose and amino acid use. RL GE signatures were established early, before maximal clinical response, and persisted. Distinct GE fingerprints predicted concurrent and future improvements in HbA1c and in weight. Human RL exhibited GE changes characterized by anabolic growth and shift in metabolic substrate use. Paradoxically, anabolic growth in RL appeared to contribute to the catabolic state elicited by RYGB. CONCLUSIONS: These data support a role for a direct effect of intestinal energy metabolism to contribute to the beneficial clinical effects of RYGB, suggesting that related pathways might be potential targets of therapeutic interest for patients with obesity with or without type 2 diabetes.