Meniscus Tear Requiring Intraoperative Repair Does Not Influence Midterm Patient-Reported Outcomes in Operatively Treated Tibial Plateau Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate whether intraoperatively repaired lateral meniscus injuries impact midterm patient-reported outcomes in those undergoing operative fixation of tibial plateau fracture. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients (n = 207) who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 with a minimum of 10-month follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the PROMIS-Preference health utility score. RESULTS: Overall, 207 patients were included with average follow-up of 2.9 years. Seventy-three patients (35%) underwent intraoperative lateral meniscus repair. Gender, age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, days to surgery, ligamentous knee injury, open fracture, vascular injury, polytraumatic injuries, Schatzker classification, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification were not associated with meniscal repair ( P > 0.05). Rates of reoperation (42% vs. 31%, P = 0.11), infection (8% vs. 10%, P = 0.60), return to work (78% vs. 75%, P = 0.73), and subsequent total knee arthroplasty (8% vs. 5%, P = 0.39) were also similar between those who had a meniscal repair and those without a meniscal injury, respectively. There was no difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (46.3 vs. 45.8, P = 0.707), PROMIS-Preference (0.51 vs. 0.50, P = 0.729), and all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score domain scores at the final follow-up between those who had a meniscal repair and those without a meniscal injury, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an operatively treated tibial plateau fracture, the presence of a concomitant intraoperatively identified and repaired lateral meniscal tear results in similar midterm PROMs and complication rates when compared with patients without meniscal injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Analysis of acute extremity compartment syndrome using a genealogic population database.

INTRODUCTION: Acute extremity compartment syndrome ("CS") is an under-researched, highly morbid condition affecting trauma populations. The purpose of this study was to analyze incidence rates and risk factors for extremity compartment syndrome using a high-quality population database. Additionally, we evaluated heritable risk for CS using available genealogic data. We hypothesized that diagnosis of extremity compartment syndrome would demonstrate heritability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with fractures of the tibia, femur, and upper extremity were retrospectively identified by ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes from 1996 to 2020 in a statewide hospital database. Exposed and unexposed cohorts were created based on a diagnosis of CS. Available demographic data were analyzed to determine risk factors for compartment syndrome using logistic regression. Mortality risk at the final follow-up was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Patients with a diagnosis of CS were matched with those without a diagnosis for heritability analysis. RESULTS: Of 158,624 fractures, 931 patients were diagnosed with CS. Incidence of CS was 0.59% (tibia 0.83%, femur 0.31%, upper extremity 0.27%). Male sex (78.1% vs. 46.4%; p < 0.001; RR = 3.24), younger age at fracture (38.8 vs. 48.0 years; p < 0.001; RR = 0.74), Medicaid enrollment (13.2% vs. 9.3%; p < 0.001; RR = 1.58), and smoking (41.1% vs. 31.1%; p < 0.001; RR 1.67) were significant risk factors for CS. CS was associated with mortality (RR 1.61, p < 0.001) at mean follow-up 8.9 years in the CS cohort. No significant heritable risk was found for diagnosis of CS. CONCLUSIONS: Without isolating high-risk fractures, rates of CS are lower than previously reported in the literature. Male sex, younger age, smoking, and Medicaid enrollment were independent risk factors for CS. CS increased mortality risk at long-term follow-up. No heritable risk was found for CS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Worse Quality of Life Associated With Hyperextension Varus Tibial Plateau Fracture Pattern.

OBJECTIVES: Compare patient-reported outcome measures between hyperextension varus tibial plateau (HEVTP) fracture patterns to non-HEVTP fracture patterns. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Single academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All patients who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 were collected. Exclusion criteria included inaccurate Current Procedural Terminology code, ipsilateral compartment syndrome, bilateral fractures, incomplete medical records, or follow-up <10 months. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: In patients who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture, compare Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, PROMIS Preference, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) between patients with a HEVTP pattern with those without. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seven patients were included, of which 17 (8%) had HEVTP fractures. Compared with non-HEVTP fracture patterns, patients with HEVTP injuries were younger (42.6 vs. 51.0, P = 0.025), more commonly male (71% vs. 44%, P = 0.033), and had higher body mass index (32.8 vs. 28.0, P = 0.05). HEVTP fractures had significantly more ligamentous knee (29% vs. 6%, P = 0.007) and vascular (12% vs. 1%, P = 0.035) injuries. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function scores were similar between groups; however, PROMIS-Preference (0.37 vs. 0.51, P = 0.017) was significantly lower in HEVTP fractures. KOOS pain, activities of daily living, and quality-of-life scores were statistically lower in HEVTP fractures, but only KOOS quality-of-life was clinically relevant (41.7 vs. 59.3, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The HEVTP fracture pattern, whether unicondylar or bicondylar, was associated with a higher rate of ligamentous and vascular injuries compared with non-HEVTP fracture patterns. They were also associated with worse health-related quality of life at midterm follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Familial Analysis of Nonunion in a Genealogic Population Database Demonstrates No Evidence of Heritable Risk.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is evidence of heritable risk for nonunion using a large, state-wide population database. DESIGN: Database. SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. POPULATION: All Utah residents from 1996 to 2021 who sustained a long bone fracture and their family members were included. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was nonunion and the prevalence of nonunion among the patients' first-, second-, and third-degree relatives. The secondary objective was to identify demographic, injury, and socioeconomic risk factors associated with nonunion. RESULTS: In total, 150,263 fractures and 6577 nonunions (4.4%) were identified. This was highly refined to a 1:3 matched cohort of 4667 nonunions of 13,981 fractures for familial clustering analysis. Cox proportional hazards did not demonstrate excessive risk of nonunion among first- ( P = 0.863), second- ( P = 0.509), and third-degree relatives ( P = 0.252). Further analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated that male sex (relative risk [RR] = 1.15; P < 0.001), Medicaid enrollment (RR = 2.64; P < 0.001), open fracture (RR = 2.53; P < 0.001), age group 41-60 years (RR = 1.43; P < 0.001), and a history of obesity (RR = 1.20; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate no evidence of heritable risk for nonunion. Independent risk factors for nonunion were male sex, Medicaid enrollment, open fracture, middle age, and a history of obesity. Although it is important to identify modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors, these results continue to support that the risk of nonunion is multifactorial, relating to injury characteristics, operative techniques, and patient-specific risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Medial and lateral dual plating of native distal femur fractures: a systematic literature review.

Introduction: Lateral locked plating (LLP) development has improved outcomes for distal femur fractures. However, there is still a modest rate of nonunion in fractures treated with LLP alone, with higher nonunion risk in high-energy fractures, intra-articular involvement, poor bone quality, severe comminution, or bone loss. Several recent studies have demonstrated both the safety and the biomechanical advantage of dual medial and lateral plating (DP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of DP for native distal femoral fractures by performing a systematic review of the literature. Methods: Studies reporting clinical outcomes for DP of native distal femur fractures were identified and systematically reviewed. Publications without full-text manuscripts, those solely involving periprosthetic fractures, or fractures other than distal femur fractures were excluded. Fracture type, mean follow-up, open versus closed fracture, number of bone grafting procedures, nonunion, reoperation rates, and complication data were collected. Methodologic study quality was assessed using the Coleman methodology score. Results: The initial electronic review and reverse inclusion protocol identified 1484 publications. After removal of duplicates and abstract review to exclude studies that did not discuss clinical treatment of femur fractures with dual plating, 101 potential manuscripts were identified and manually reviewed. After final review, 12 studies were included in this study. There were 199 fractures with average follow-up time of 13.72 months. Unplanned reoperations and nonunion occurred in 19 (8.5%) and 9 (4.5%) cases, respectively. The most frequently reported complications were superficial infection (n = 6, 3%) and deep infection (n = 5, 2.5%) postoperatively. Other complications included delayed union (n = 6, 3%) not requiring additional surgical treatment and knee stiffness in four patients (2%) necessitating manipulation under anesthesia or lysis of adhesions. The average Coleman score was 50.5 (range 13.5-72), suggesting that included studies were of moderate-to-poor quality. Conclusions: Clinical research interest in DP of distal femoral fractures has markedly increased in the past few decades. The current data suggest that DP of native distal femoral fractures is associated with favorable nonunion and reoperation rates compared with previously published rates associated with LLP alone. In the current review, DP of distal femoral fractures was associated with acceptable rates of complications and generally good functional outcomes. More high-quality, directly comparable research is necessary to validate the conclusions of this review.

Reformatting of Computed Tomography Scans Parallel to the S1 End Plate Increases Visualization of Trans Sacral Pathway in the First Sacral Segment, Especially With Dysmorphism.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reformatted computed tomography (CT) scans would increase surgeons' confidence in placing a trans sacral (TS) screw in the first sacral segment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: There were 50 patients with uninjured pelvises who were reviewed by 9 orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons and 5 orthopaedic residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The overall percentage of surgeons who believe it was safe to place a TS screw in the first sacral segment with standard (axial cuts perpendicular to the scanner gantry) versus reformatted (parallel to the S1 end plate) CT scans. RESULTS: Overall, 58% of patients were believed to have a safe corridor in traditional cut axial CT scans, whereas 68% were believed to have a safe corridor on reformatted CT scans ( P < 0.001). When grouped by dysplasia, those without sacral dysplasia (n = 28) had a safe corridor 93% of the time on traditional scans and 93% of the time with reformatted CT scans ( P = 0.87). However, of those who had dysplasia (n = 22), only 12% were believed to have a safe corridor on original scans compared with 35% on reformatted scans ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT scan reformatting parallel to the S1 superior end plate increases the likelihood of identifying a safe corridor for a TS screw, especially in patients with evidence of sacral dysplasia. The authors would recommend the routine use of reformatting CT scans in this manner to provide a better understanding of the upper sacral segment osseous fixation pathways.