The road to virtual control groups and the importance of proper body-weight selection.

Virtual control groups (VCGs) created from historical control data (HCD) can reduce the number of concurrent control group animals needed in regulatory toxicity studies by up to 25%. This study investigates the performance of VCGs on statistical outcomes of body weight development between treatment and control groups in legacy studies. The objective is to reproduce the statistical outcomes of 28-day sub-chronic studies (legacy studies) after replacing the concurrent control group with virtual ones. In rodent toxicity studies initial body weight is used as surrogate for the age of animals. For the assessment of VCG-sampling methods three different approaches are explored: (i) sampling VCGs from the entire HCD ignoring initial body weight information of the legacy study, (ii) sampling from HCD matching the legacy study's initial body weights, and (iii) sampling from HCD with assigned statistical weights derived from legacy study initial body weight information. It is shown that the ability to reproduce statistical outcomes by virtual controls is mainly determined by the congruence between the legacy study and the HCD weight distribution: regardless of the chosen approach, the ability to reproduce statistical outcomes was well for VCGs when the legacy study's initial-body-weight distribution was similar to the HCD's. When the initial body weight range of the legacy study was at the extreme ends of the HCD's distribution, the weighted-sampling approach was superior. This article highlights the importance of proper HCD-matching by the legacy study's initial body weight and discusses required conditions to accurately reproduce body weight development.

Animal control data from past studies performed in a standardized manner can be used to create virtual control groups (VCGs) to use in new studies instead of control animals. This approach can reduce the number of study animals by up to 25%. This study assesses the performance of VCGs selected by body weight in rat studies. The objective was to reproduce the original study results as closely as possible after replacing the original control group values with VCGs from a pool of historical control values. Several methods for selecting control animal data to create VCGs were compared. Among these, assigning statistical weights to the sampling pool yielded the best performance. Ideally the body weight distributions on day 1 of the study should be similar between the VCG and the original study animals. This article shows that proper selection VCGs can yield reliable study data with fewer animals.

Points to consider regarding the use and implementation of virtual controls in nonclinical general toxicology studies.

The replacement of a proportion of concurrent controls by virtual controls in nonclinical safety studies has gained traction over the last few years. This is supported by foundational work, encouraged by regulators, and aligned with societal expectations regarding the use of animals in research. This paper provides an overview of the points to consider for any institution on the verge of implementing this concept, with emphasis given on database creation, risks, and discipline-specific perspectives.

Replacing concurrent controls with virtual control groups in rat toxicity studies.

Virtual control groups (VCGs) in nonclinical toxicity represent the concept of using appropriate historical control data for replacing concurrent control group animals. Historical control data collected from standardized studies can serve as base for constructing VCGs and legacy study reports can be used as a benchmark to evaluate the VCG performance. Replacing concurrent controls of legacy studies with VCGs should ideally reproduce the results of these studies. Based on three four-week rat oral toxicity legacy studies with varying degrees of toxicity findings we developed a concept to evaluate VCG performance on different levels: the ability of VCGs to (i) reproduce statistically significant deviations from the concurrent control, (ii) reproduce test substance-related effects, and (iii) reproduce the conclusion of the toxicity study in terms of threshold dose, target organs, toxicological biomarkers (clinical pathology) and reversibility. Although VCGs have shown a low to moderate ability to reproduce statistical results, the general study conclusions remained unchanged. Our results provide a first indication that carefully selected historical control data can be used to replace concurrent control without impairing the general study conclusion. Additionally, the developed procedures and workflows lay the foundation for the future validation of virtual controls for a use in regulatory toxicology.

Toward implementing virtual control groups in nonclinical safety studies.

Historical data from control groups in animal toxicity studies is currently mainly used for comparative purposes to assess validity and robustness of study results. Due to the highly controlled environment in which the studies are performed and the homogeneity of the animal collectives it has been proposed to use the historical data for building so-called virtual control groups, which could replace partly or entirely the concurrent control. This would constitute a substantial contribution to the reduction of animal use in safety studies. Before the concept can be implemented, the prerequisites regarding data collection, curation and statistical evaluation together with a validation strategy need to be identified to avoid any impairment of the study outcome and subsequent consequences for human risk assessment. To further assess and develop the concept of virtual control groups the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t4) sponsored a workshop with stakeholders from the pharmaceutical and chemical industry, academia, FDA, pharmaceutical, contract research organizations (CROs), and non-governmental organizations in Washington, which took place in March 2023. This report summarizes the current efforts of a European initiative to share, collect and curate animal control data in a centralized database and the first approaches to identify optimal matching criteria between virtual controls and the treatment arms of a study as well as first reflections about strategies for a qualification procedure and potential pitfalls of the concept.

Animal safety studies are usually performed with three groups of animals where increasing amounts of the test chemical are given to the animals and one control group where the animals do not receive the test chemical. The design of such studies, the characteristics of the animals, and the measured parameters are often very similar from study to study. Therefore, it has been suggested that measurement data from the control groups could be reused from study to study to lower the total number of animals per study. This could reduce animal use by up to 25% for such standardized studies. A workshop was held to discuss the pros and cons of such a concept and what would have to be done to implement it without threatening the reliability of the study outcome or the resulting human risk assessment.

Can Historical Control Group Data Be Used to Replace Concurrent Controls in Animal Studies?

The availability of large amounts of high-quality control data from tightly controlled regulated animal safety data has created the idea to re-use these data beyond its classical applications of quality control, identification of treatment-related effects and assessing effect-size relevance for building virtual control groups (VCGs). While the ethical and cost-saving aspects of such a concept are immediately evident, the potential challenges need to be carefully considered to avoid any effect which could lower the sensitivity of an animal study to detect adverse events, safety thresholds, target organs, or biomarkers. In our brief communication, we summarize the current discussion regarding VCGs and propose a path forward how the replacement of concurrent control with VCGs resulting from historical data could be systematically assessed and to come to conclusions regarding the scientific value of the concept.

Hepatotoxicity of AKR1C3 Inhibitor BAY1128688: Findings from an Early Terminated Phase IIa Trial for the Treatment of Endometriosis.

INTRODUCTION: BAY1128688 is a selective inhibitor of aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3 (AKR1C3), an enzyme implicated in the pathology of endometriosis and other disorders. In vivo animal studies suggested a potential therapeutic application of BAY1128688 in treating endometriosis. Early clinical studies in healthy volunteers supported the start of phase IIa. OBJECTIVE: This manuscript reports the results of a clinical trial (AKRENDO1) assessing the effects of BAY1128688 in adult premenopausal women with endometriosis-related pain symptoms over a 12-week treatment period. METHODS: Participants in this placebo-controlled, multicenter phase IIa clinical trial (NCT03373422) were randomized into one of five BAY1128688 treatment groups: 3 mg once daily (OD), 10 mg OD, 30 mg OD, 30 mg twice daily (BID), 60 mg BID; or a placebo group. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BAY1128688 were investigated. RESULTS: Dose-/exposure-dependent hepatotoxicity was observed following BAY1128688 treatment, characterized by elevations in serum alanine transferase (ALT) occurring at around 12 weeks of treatment and prompting premature trial termination. The reduced number of valid trial completers precludes conclusions regarding treatment efficacy. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BAY1128688 among participants with endometriosis were comparable with those previously found in healthy volunteers and were not predictive of the subsequent ALT elevations observed. CONCLUSIONS: The hepatotoxicity of BAY1128688 observed in AKRENDO1 was not predicted by animal studies nor by studies in healthy volunteers. However, in vitro interactions of BAY1128688 with bile salt transporters indicated a potential risk factor for hepatotoxicity at higher doses. This highlights the importance of in vitro mechanistic and transporter interaction studies in the assessment of hepatoxicity risk and suggests further mechanistic understanding is required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03373422 (date registered: November 23, 2017).

Perspectives of data science in preclinical safety assessment.

The data landscape in preclinical safety assessment is fundamentally changing because of not only emerging new data types, such as human systems biology, or real-world data (RWD) from clinical trials, but also technological advancements in data-processing software and analytical tools based on deep learning approaches. The recent developments of data science are illustrated with use cases for the three factors: predictive safety (new in silico tools), insight generation (new data for outstanding questions); and reverse translation (extrapolating from clinical experience to resolve preclinical questions). Further advances in this field can be expected if companies focus on overcoming identified challenges related to a lack of platforms and data silos and assuring appropriate training of data scientists within the preclinical safety teams.

The evolving role of investigative toxicology in the pharmaceutical industry.

For decades, preclinical toxicology was essentially a descriptive discipline in which treatment-related effects were carefully reported and used as a basis to calculate safety margins for drug candidates. In recent years, however, technological advances have increasingly enabled researchers to gain insights into toxicity mechanisms, supporting greater understanding of species relevance and translatability to humans, prediction of safety events, mitigation of side effects and development of safety biomarkers. Consequently, investigative (or mechanistic) toxicology has been gaining momentum and is now a key capability in the pharmaceutical industry. Here, we provide an overview of the current status of the field using case studies and discuss the potential impact of ongoing technological developments, based on a survey of investigative toxicologists from 14 European-based medium-sized to large pharmaceutical companies.

A rodent thyroid-liver chip to capture thyroid toxicity on organ function level.

Endocrine disruption by environmental chemicals continues to be a concern for human safety. The rat, a widely used model organism in toxicology, is very sensitive to chemical-induced thyroid perturbation, e.g., histopathological alterations in thyroid tissue. Species differences in the susceptibility to thyroid perturbation lead to uncertainty in human safety risk assessments. Hazard identification and characterization of chemically induced thyroid perturbation would therefore benefit from in vitro models addressing different mechanisms of action in a single functional assay, ideally across species. We here introduce a rat thyroid-liver chip that enables simultaneous identification of direct and indirect (liver-mediated) thyroid perturbation on organ-level functions in vitro. A second manuscript describes our work toward a human thyroid-liver chip (Kühnlenz et al., 2022). The presented microfluidic model consisting of primary rat thyroid follicles and liver 3D spheroids maintains a tissue-specific phenotype for up to 21 days. More precisely, the thyroid model exhibits a follicular architecture expressing basolateral and apical markers and secretes T4. Likewise, liver spheroids retain hepatocellular characteristics, e.g., a stable release of albumin and urea, the presence of bile canalicular networks, and the formation of T4-glucuronide. Experiments with reference chemicals demonstrated proficiency to detect direct and indirect mechanisms of thyroid perturbation through decreased thyroid hormone secretion and increased gT4 formation, respectively. Prospectively this rat thyroid-liver chip model, together with its human counterpart, may support a species-specific quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation to improve a data-driven and evidence-based human safety risk assessment with significant contributions to the 3R principles.

A microfluidic thyroid-liver platform to assess chemical safety in humans.

Thyroid hormones (THs) are crucial regulators of human metabolism and early development. During the safety assessment of plant protection products, the human relevance of chemically induced TH perturbations observed in test animals remains uncertain. European regulatory authorities request follow-up in vitro studies to elucidate human-relevant interferences on thyroid gland function or TH catabolism through hepatic enzyme induction. However, human in vitro assays based on single molecular initiating events poorly reflect the complex TH biology and related liver-thyroid axis. To address this complexity, we present human three-dimensional thyroid and liver organoids with key functions of TH metabolism. The thyroid model resembles in vivo-like follicular architecture and a TSH-dependent triiodothyronine synthesis over 21 days, which is inhibited by methimazole. The HepaRG-based liver model, secreting the critical TH-binding proteins albumin and thyroxine-binding globulin, emulates an active TH catabolism via the formation of glucuronidated and sulfated thyroxine (gT4/sT4). Activation of the nuclear receptors PXR and AHR was demonstrated via the induction of specific CYP isoenzymes by rifampicin, pregnenolone-16α-carbonitrile, and ß-naphthoflavone. However, this nuclear receptor activation, assumed to regulate UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and sulfotransferases, appeared to have no effect on gT4 and sT4 formation in this human-derived hepatic cell line model. Finally, established single-tissue models were successfully co-cultured in a perfused two-organ chip for 21 days. In conclusion, this model presents a first step towards a complex multimodular human platform that will help to identify both direct and indirect thyroid disruptors that are relevant from a human safety perspective.

eTRANSAFE: Building a sustainable framework to share reproducible drug safety knowledge with the public domain.

Integrative drug safety research in translational health informatics has rapidly evolved and included data that are drawn in from many resources, combining diverse data that are either reused from (curated) repositories, or newly generated at source. Each resource is mandated by different sets of metadata rules that are imposed on the incoming data. Combination of the data cannot be readily achieved without interference of data stewardship and the top-down policy guidelines that supervise and inform the process for data combination to aid meaningful interpretation and analysis of such data. The eTRANSAFE Consortium's effort to drive integrative drug safety research at a large scale hereby present the lessons learnt and the proposal of solution at the guidelines in practice at this Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) project. Recommendations in these guidelines were compiled from feedback received from key stakeholders in regulatory agencies, EFPIA companies, and academic partners. The research reproducibility guidelines presented in this study lay the foundation for a comprehensive data sharing and knowledge management plans accounting for research data management in the drug safety space - FAIR data sharing guidelines, and the model verification guidelines as generic deliverables that best practices that can be reused by other scientific community members at large. FAIR data sharing is a dynamic landscape that rapidly evolves with fast-paced technology advancements. The research reproducibility in drug safety guidelines introduced in this study provides a reusable framework that can be adopted by other research communities that aim to integrate public and private data in biomedical research space.

The eTRANSAFE Project on Translational Safety Assessment through Integrative Knowledge Management: Achievements and Perspectives.

eTRANSAFE is a research project funded within the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), which aims at developing integrated databases and computational tools (the eTRANSAFE ToxHub) that support the translational safety assessment of new drugs by using legacy data provided by the pharmaceutical companies that participate in the project. The project objectives include the development of databases containing preclinical and clinical data, computational systems for translational analysis including tools for data query, analysis and visualization, as well as computational models to explain and predict drug safety events.

Guidelines for FAIR sharing of preclinical safety and off-target pharmacology data.

Pre-competitive data sharing can offer the pharmaceutical industry significant benefits in terms of reducing the time and costs involved in getting a new drug to market through more informed testing strategies and knowledge gained by pooling data. If sufficient data is shared and can be co-analyzed, then it can also offer the potential for reduced animal usage and improvements in the in silico prediction of toxicological effects. Data sharing benefits can be further enhanced by applying the FAIR Guiding Principles, reducing time spent curating, transforming and aggregating datasets and allowing more time for data mining and analysis. We hope to facilitate data sharing by other organizations and initiatives by describing lessons learned as part of the Enhancing TRANslational SAFEty Assessment through Integrative Knowledge Management (eTRANSAFE) project, an Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) partnership which aims to integrate publicly available data sources with proprietary preclinical and clinical data donated by pharmaceutical organizations. Methods to foster trust and overcome non-technical barriers to data sharing such as legal and IPR (intellectual property rights) are described, including the security requirements that pharmaceutical organizations generally expect to be met. We share the consensus achieved among pharmaceutical partners on decision criteria to be included in internal clearance pro­cedures used to decide if data can be shared. We also report on the consensus achieved on specific data fields to be excluded from sharing for sensitive preclinical safety and pharmacology data that could otherwise not be shared.

New ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshop.

The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) convened a 'Blue Sky Workshop' on new ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity. The aim of the Workshop was to formulate strategic ideas to improve and increase the applicability, implementation and acceptance of modern non-animal methods to determine systemic toxicity. The Workshop concluded that good progress is being made to assess repeated dose toxicity without animals taking advantage of existing knowledge in toxicology, thresholds of toxicological concern, adverse outcome pathways and read-across workflows. These approaches can be supported by New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) utilising modern molecular technologies and computational methods. Recommendations from the Workshop were based around the needs for better chemical safety assessment: how to strengthen the evidence base for decision making; to develop, standardise and harmonise NAMs for human toxicity; and the improvement in the applicability and acceptance of novel techniques. "Disruptive thinking" is required to reconsider chemical legislation, validation of NAMs and the opportunities to move away from reliance on animal tests. Case study practices and data sharing, ensuring reproducibility of NAMs, were viewed as crucial to the improvement of non-animal test approaches for systemic toxicity.

Introducing the concept of virtual control groups into preclinical toxicology testing.

Sharing legacy data from in vivo toxicity studies offers the opportunity to analyze the variability of control groups stratified for strain, age, duration of study, vehicle and other experimental conditions. Historical animal control group data may lead to a repository, which could be used to construct virtual control groups (VCGs) for toxicity studies. VCGs are an established concept in clinical trials, but the idea of replacing living beings with virtual data sets has so far not been introduced into the design of regulatory animal studies. The use of VCGs has the potential of a 25% reduction in animal use by replacing the control group animals with existing randomized data sets. Prerequisites for such an approach are the availability of large and well-structured control data sets as well as thorough statistical evaluations. the foundation of data sharing has been laid within the Innovative Medicines Initiatives projects eTOX and eTRANSAFE. For a proof of principle participating companies have started to collect control group data for subacute (4-week) GLP studies with Wistar rats (the strain preferentially used in Europe) and are characterizing these data for its variability. In a second step, the control group data will be shared among the companies and cross-company variability will be investigated. In a third step, a set of studies will be analyzed to assess whether the use of VCG data would have influenced the outcome of the study compared to the real control group.

Biology-inspired microphysiological systems to advance patient benefit and animal welfare in drug development

The first microfluidic microphysiological systems (MPS) entered the academic scene more than 15 years ago and were considered an enabling technology to human (patho)biology in vitro and, therefore, provide alternative approaches to laboratory animals in pharmaceutical drug development and academic research. Nowadays, the field generates more than a thousand scientific publications per year. Despite the MPS hype in academia and by platform providers, which says this technology is about to reshape the entire in vitro culture landscape in basic and applied research, MPS approaches have neither been widely adopted by the pharmaceutical industry yet nor reached regulated drug authorization processes at all. Here, 46 leading experts from all stakeholders - academia, MPS supplier industry, pharmaceutical and consumer products industries, and leading regulatory agencies - worldwide have analyzed existing challenges and hurdles along the MPS-based assay life cycle in a second workshop of this kind in June 2019. They identified that the level of qualification of MPS-based assays for a given context of use and a communication gap between stakeholders are the major challenges for industrial adoption by end-users. Finally, a regulatory acceptance dilemma exists against that background. This t4 report elaborates on these findings in detail and summarizes solutions how to overcome the roadblocks. It provides recommendations and a roadmap towards regulatory accepted MPS-based models and assays for patients' benefit and further laboratory animal reduction in drug development. Finally, experts highlighted the potential of MPS-based human disease models to feedback into laboratory animal replacement in basic life science research.

Erratum to Template for the description of cell-based toxicological test methods to allow evaluation and regulatory use of the data.

In this manuscript, which appeared in ALTEX (2019), 36(4), 682- 699, doi:10.14573/altex.1909271 , the affiliation of Hennicke Kamp should be Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Further, the reference to an article by Bal-Price et al. (2015) should have the following doi:10.1007/s00204-015-1464-2 .

Template for the description of cell-based toxicological test methods to allow evaluation and regulatory use of the data.

Only few cell-based test methods are described by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines or other regulatory references (e.g., the European Pharmacopoeia). The majority of toxicity tests still falls into the category of non-guideline methods. Data from these tests may nevertheless be used to support regulatory decisions or to guide strategies to assess compounds (e.g., drugs, agrochemicals) during research and development if they fulfill basic requirements concerning their relevance, reproducibility and predictivity. Only a method description of sufficient clarity and detail allows interpretation and use of the data. To guide regulators faced with increasing amounts of data from non-guideline studies, the OECD formulated Guidance Document 211 (GD211) on method documentation for the purpose of safety assessment. As GD211 is targeted mainly at regulators, it leaves scientists less familiar with regulation uncertain as to what level of detail is required and how individual questions should be answered. Moreover, little attention was given to the description of the test system (i.e., cell culture) and the steps leading to it being established in the guidance. To address these issues, an annotated toxicity test method template (ToxTemp) was developed (i) to fulfill all requirements of GD211, (ii) to guide the user concerning the types of answers and detail of information required, (iii) to include acceptance criteria for test elements, and (iv) to define the cells sufficiently and transparently. The fully annotated ToxTemp is provided here, together with reference to a database containing exemplary descriptions of more than 20 cell-based tests.