Comparison of dose-volume histograms and dose-wall histograms of the rectum of patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy.

The correlation between dose values from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and dose values from dose-wall histograms (DWHs) of the rectum tissue of patient with uterine cervix cancer was determined. The minimum dose in 2 cm3 in the high-dose region of the DVH is a good estimate of the dose in the rectum wall.

A method to improve the dose distribution of interstitial breast implants using geometrically optimized stepping source techniques and dose normalization.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The standard linear source breast implant of our institution was compared with alternative linear source implant geometries and a stepping source implant, to evaluate the possibility of minimizing the treated volume. Normalization to a higher isodose than the conventional 85% of the mean central dose (MCD) was investigated for the stepping source implant to reduce the thickness of the treated volume and to increase dose uniformity. The purpose of this study was to develop an implant geometry yielding a high conformity and a more uniform dose distribution over the target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dose distributions of four implant geometries were compared for a planning target volume (PTV) of 48 cm(3). Implants #1 (standard) and #2 had linear sources arranged in a triangular pattern of equal lengths and lengths adapted to the shape of the PTV. Implants #3 and #4 were squared pattern arranged implants with linear sources and a stepping source with geometric optimized dwell times. The active lengths were adapted to the shape of the PTV. Using implant #4 for PTVs of different volumes, the reference dose (RD) was normalized to 85 and 91% of the MCD. RESULTS: Comparing implants #2, #3, and #4 with #1, the treated volume (V(100)) encompassed by the reference isodose was reduced by 22, 35, and 37%, respectively. The volumes receiving a dose of at least 125% (V(125)) of the reference dose was reduced by 16, 30, and 30%, respectively. The conformation number increased being 0.30, 0.39, 0.47, and 0.48 for implants #1, #2, #3, and #4, respectively. The average reduction of V(125) when the dose was normalized to 91% compared with 85% of the MCD was 18%. CONCLUSIONS: A conformal treatment to a PTV could be best achieved with a geometrically optimized stepping source plan with needles arranged in a squared pattern. Reduction of high dose volumes within the implant was obtained by normalizing the RD to 91% instead of 85% of the MCD.

Inter-observer variation in delineation of bladder and rectum contours for brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In 3D treatment planning of low dose rate brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma the dose in bladder and rectum can be estimated from dose-volume histograms (DVHs). In this study, the influence of inter-observer variation in delineation of bladder and rectum on DVHs and dose at specific bladder and rectum points was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three observers delineated bladder and rectum on axial CT images of ten patients. The highest minimum dose in bladder and rectum was determined for, respectively, 2 cm(3) (D(2)) and 5 cm(3) (D(5)), as well as the dose at specific points placed on the bladder and rectum wall. RESULTS: The inter-observer variation in D(2) was 10% (1 average relative SD) in bladder and 11% (1 SD) in rectum. In D(5) the variation was 8% (1 SD) in bladder and 11% in rectum. The variation in the bladder point was 13% (1 SD) and in the rectum point 11% (1 SD). Differences in delineation among the observers were caused by unclear organ boundaries on the CT images. CONCLUSIONS: Taking the inter-observer variation caused by delineation differences into account, dose in bladder and rectum can be determined within an accuracy of about 10% (1 SD).

An analysis of the effect of ovoid shields in a selectron-LDR cervical applicator on dose distributions in rectum and bladder.

PURPOSE: A disadvantage of ovoid shields in a Fletcher-type applicator is that these shields cause artifacts on postimplant CT images. CT images, however, make it possible to calculate the dose distribution in the rectum and the bladder. To be able to estimate the possible advantage of having CT information over the use of ovoid shields without having CT information, we investigated the influence of shielding segments in a Fletcher-type Selectron-LDR applicator on the dose distribution in rectum and bladder. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Contours of rectum and bladder were delineated on transaxial CT slices of 15 unshielded applications. Of the volumes contained within these structures dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated. In a similar way, DVHs of simulated shielded applications were calculated. The reduction, due to shielding, of the dose to the 2 cm3 (D2) and 5 cm3 (D5) volume of the cumulative DVHs of rectum and bladder, were determined. An isodose pattern in the sagittal plane through the center of each applicator was plotted to compare the location of the shielded area with the location of maximum dose in rectum and bladder in the unshielded situation. In two cases local dose reductions to the rectal wall were determined by calculating the dose in points at 10-mm intervals on the rectal contours. RESULTS: For the rectum, the reduction of D2 ranged from 0 to 11.1%, with an average of 5.0%; the reduction of D5 ranged from 2.3 to 12.1%, with an average of 6.4%. The reduction of D2 and D5 for the bladder ranged from 0 to 11.9% and from 0 to 11.6%, with average values of 2.2 and 2.6%, respectively. In 8 out of 15 cases the rectal maximum dose was located inferior to the shielded area. In all cases except one the bladder maximum dose was located superior to the shielded area. Local dose reductions on the rectal wall can be as high as 30% or more in an optimally shielded area. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions of D2 and D5 to rectum and bladder due to shielding are rather small, because the shielded area does usually not coincide with the high dose region and even if it does, the shielded area is too small to result in large reductions of these values. Because local dose reductions vary largely, one should proceed with caution when calculating the dose in just one rectal or bladder reference point. Because large overall dose reductions cannot be achieved with shielding, it is safe to use an unshielded applicator when post implant CT images are used to realize optimized dose distributions.

Replacement corrections of a Farmer-type ionization chamber for the calibration of Cs-137 and Ir-192 sources in a solid phantom.

Calibrating Cs-137 and Ir-192 brachytherapy sources in a solid phantom has the advantage over calibration in air that the positioning of the sources is very accurate and straightforward. In order to determine the air kerma rate at the point of measurement it is, however, necessary to take the replacement of the phantom material by the ionization chamber into account. The replacement correction factor pr of a Farmer-type ionization chamber has been determined for a few types of 137Cs and 192Ir sources at a source to chamber distance of 5 cm. For spherical 137Cs sources the replacement correction was determined by means of measurements with chambers with decreasing diameter and length. Additional measurements were performed for some other source configurations in order to determine pr for 137Cs micro-seed trains. For an 192Ir-HDR source pr was determined for a source chamber configuration equal to that for spherical 137Cs sources by comparing measurements in-phantom with measurements free in-air. Finally, measurements were performed with source configurations that yielded pr values for 192Ir seed trains and 192Ir wires. The resulting replacement correction factors are all within +/- 2% of unity. It can be concluded that, although the dose nonuniformity over the chamber volume caused by each source is rather substantial, the replacement correction that has to be applied is rather small.